NatP4 wrote:this turned into a bash EG thread based on nothing happening lol
wizards fan PTSD
18 years of Wizards fandom and 10+ years of watching some of the poorest managerial decisions does that to ya'.
Moderators: LyricalRico, nate33, montestewart

NatP4 wrote:this turned into a bash EG thread based on nothing happening lol
wizards fan PTSD

mhd wrote:Its obvious that we want to unload Nicholson in attaching our 1st rounder. Collision, Shabaazz, are not Lou Williams to garner a 1st.
miller31time wrote:NatP4 wrote:this turned into a bash EG thread based on nothing happening lol
wizards fan PTSD
18 years of Wizards fandom and 10+ years of watching some of the poorest managerial decisions does that to ya'.
truwizfan4evr wrote:They Clippers have called about almost every available small forward type, but no one is in a rush to take Jamal Crawford, Austin Rivers, and a distant first-round pick. That won’t get them Wilson Chandler, and the Wiz threw their phones on the floor when the Clippers inquired about Otto Porter, per league sources.
truwizfan4evr wrote:truwizfan4evr wrote:They Clippers have called about almost every available small forward type, but no one is in a rush to take Jamal Crawford, Austin Rivers, and a distant first-round pick. That won’t get them Wilson Chandler, and the Wiz threw their phones on the floor when the Clippers inquired about Otto Porter, per league sources.
I agree. A second rounder should be enough.
WallToWall wrote:http://basketball.realgm.com/wiretap/245016/Wizards-Interested-In-Trading-For-Shabazz-Muhammad
Shabazz Muhammad... lets get back to the discussion.
I dont think its Shabazz for a 1st rnd pick. Thats not good value for us. There's got to be more to the package.
Or, maybe is Shabazz for a 2nd rnd pick.
P'Oed wrote:I'd rather have Wilson Chandler than Shabazz. All dependent on cost of course.
Obviously time will only tell on any move that's made, but I'm glad (for now) that we stuck to our guns on the Lou trade. Even the best result out of the trade just wasn't worth the cost to me.
pcbothwel wrote:P'Oed wrote:I'd rather have Wilson Chandler than Shabazz. All dependent on cost of course.
Obviously time will only tell on any move that's made, but I'm glad (for now) that we stuck to our guns on the Lou trade. Even the best result out of the trade just wasn't worth the cost to me.
Chandler has been about as good as Shabazz this year, which is to say.. not very good. RPM has him 40th (Behind Luol Deng) and he gets 12M each of the two years after this one... No thanks