ImageImageImageImageImage

Big Balls traded to Boston for (almost) NOTHING

Moderators: nate33, montestewart, LyricalRico

User avatar
Chocolate City Jordanaire
RealGM
Posts: 55,607
And1: 10,870
Joined: Aug 05, 2001
       

Re: Big Balls traded to Boston for Fab Melo 

Post#221 » by Chocolate City Jordanaire » Fri Feb 22, 2013 1:55 am

nate33 wrote:Way to go Wizards! Take a decent bench player having his best year, bench him and drive down his value, then, while dealing from a position of weakness, trade him for a DLeague scrub big man.


#FireGrunfeld



+1

I would have liked a second round pick. The only way this isn't a negative is if they have a very good call up from the D-League.
User avatar
Chocolate City Jordanaire
RealGM
Posts: 55,607
And1: 10,870
Joined: Aug 05, 2001
       

Re: Big Balls traded to Boston for (almost) NOTHING 

Post#222 » by Chocolate City Jordanaire » Fri Feb 22, 2013 2:00 am

rockymac52 wrote:Also, (trying desperately to find some positive here), at least Collins is an elite defender. He's absolutely worthless on offense, but is legitimately one of the best defenders in the league.

Synergy says he's the 10th most efficient defender in the entire NBA this season, and the 2nd best with at least 100 plays "against" him. Still a small sample size, but hey, I'll grasping for straws here.

With that said, the last thing we needed was another big man. I'm sorry.



Ted doesn't want any bad guys on the team. Jordan threw his jersey, so he's a bad guy. Ted doesn't like that. Buh bye, Jordan. That and Crawford really no longer fit the team's plans.

I think they did Jordan Crawford a solid by letting him go play for Doc Rivers. Crawford did what he was told here, but Beal is the future. Crawford should have been traded the instant they drafted Beal IMO. At least Jordan has a good chance to have a good career from here out, just like Andray Blatche.
User avatar
Chocolate City Jordanaire
RealGM
Posts: 55,607
And1: 10,870
Joined: Aug 05, 2001
       

Re: Big Balls traded to Boston for (almost) NOTHING 

Post#223 » by Chocolate City Jordanaire » Fri Feb 22, 2013 2:04 am

nuposse04 wrote:So what is Almond up to these days....


As bad as he looked on offense the team went 6-0 and he finished with some ridiculously high positive points per 100 possessions with Almond on the floor.

There are better prospects in the D-League who are also younger, but I believe Almond will break out if given a chance.
User avatar
Chocolate City Jordanaire
RealGM
Posts: 55,607
And1: 10,870
Joined: Aug 05, 2001
       

Re: Big Balls traded to Boston for (almost) NOTHING 

Post#224 » by Chocolate City Jordanaire » Fri Feb 22, 2013 2:07 am

willbcocks wrote:Crawford sucks and hurts the team when he's on the floor. He's a distraction in the lockerroom. We saved 2 million dollars. At the end of the day, who cares? If you think big picture, nothing's changed...


...we're still screwed.



+1

We are until Ted Leonsis trades Ernie Grunfeld.
User avatar
rockymac52
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,824
And1: 73
Joined: Dec 14, 2006

Re: Big Balls traded to Boston for (almost) NOTHING 

Post#225 » by rockymac52 » Fri Feb 22, 2013 2:08 am

Worst 2 deadline deals, IMO, came from possibly the worst 2 GMs (both of which have miraculously and inexplicably held their positions for over a decade) - Ernie Grunfeld and Geoff Petrie.

Are you telling me we couldn't have beat the Rockets' package that got them Thomas Robinson?

All they had to do was give up Patrick Patterson, Cole Aldrich, and Toney Douglas. Aldrich and Douglas were essentially just expiring contracts in the deal, as was Francisco Garcia on the other side. So all we had to do was come up with a better offer than Patrick Patterson and we could have had Thomas Robinson.

If you start our offer with Jordan Crawford, you're arguably there already. And if not, then you're damn close. Throw in one of Vesely, Singleton, or Booker and you probably have a deal. Easy as that.

Now, sure, maybe we legitimately didn't want TRob. Or maybe the Kings legitimately didn't want Crawford. Both are more than plausible. But come on...

I refuse to believe the Wizards couldn't get as much as a 2nd round draft pick from ANY team in return for Crawford.
User avatar
Chocolate City Jordanaire
RealGM
Posts: 55,607
And1: 10,870
Joined: Aug 05, 2001
       

Re: Big Balls traded to Boston for (almost) NOTHING 

Post#226 » by Chocolate City Jordanaire » Fri Feb 22, 2013 2:11 am

The Wizards have sold a 2nd rounder that could have been DeJuan Blair, when Blair was good coming out of college. They drafted Mack and cut him (when other guys like Charles Jenkins, drafted after Mack, are still with their teams). They also wasted a high second round pick on Satoransky, when nobody would have picked the guy before the Wizards' later pick.

Washington didn't even want a round 2 pick, IMO, just to show they're stuck on stupid IMO.
queridiculo
RealGM
Posts: 17,956
And1: 9,345
Joined: Mar 29, 2005
Location: So long Wizturdz.
   

Re: Big Balls traded to Boston for (almost) NOTHING 

Post#227 » by queridiculo » Fri Feb 22, 2013 2:11 am

How the **** did this trade thread make it to page 15???
User avatar
dangermouse
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,628
And1: 814
Joined: Dec 08, 2009

Re: Big Balls traded to Boston for (almost) NOTHING 

Post#228 » by dangermouse » Fri Feb 22, 2013 2:13 am

Ah, I didnt realise Barbosa was injured. That changes things and makes this trade seem rather stupid. We literally have gifted the Celtics Crawford.

Still, some gift....

Count me in as someone who would like to see the great Almond return.
Image
long suffrin' boulez fan wrote:
NatP4 wrote:but why would the pacers want Mahinmi's contract


Well, in fairness, we took Mike Pence off their hands. Taking back Mahinmi is the least they can do.
User avatar
Chocolate City Jordanaire
RealGM
Posts: 55,607
And1: 10,870
Joined: Aug 05, 2001
       

Re: Big Balls traded to Boston for (almost) NOTHING 

Post#229 » by Chocolate City Jordanaire » Fri Feb 22, 2013 2:16 am

truwizfan4evr wrote:How is this a good trade in Ernie eyes? We gain nothing that's the point of trade is to get better not give the other team something and get nothing back. Ernie is the worst gm in the nba by far.


It has been a really cruel twist, having to be a fan of this Wizards team with Ernie Grunfeld allowed to commit "GM malpractice" all these years.

The man is so bad it is hard to fathom.
JAR69
Pro Prospect
Posts: 757
And1: 295
Joined: Jul 25, 2002
   

Re: Big Balls traded to Boston for (almost) NOTHING 

Post#230 » by JAR69 » Fri Feb 22, 2013 2:21 am

I don't get what all this complaining is about. JC is one of the least efficient players in the league, a shot-jacker who ruins the offensive flow and plays terrible defense. Don't you think GMs around the league know this, too? And he had become a cancer, interfering with the good team dynamic the Wizards have built. So the Wizards essentially cut him. And there is some value to eliminating his $2.2 million contract next year. While alone it doesn't open up any cap space, if we make other moves this summer (trade Okafor or Ariza), then that space will become valuable. Yes, I would have preferred a 2nd round pick as well, but we have no idea if anyone offered that.
"It takes talent, strategy and millions of dollars to compete in the N.B.A. But regret is the league’s greatest currency." - Howard Beck
User avatar
dangermouse
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,628
And1: 814
Joined: Dec 08, 2009

Re: Big Balls traded to Boston for (almost) NOTHING 

Post#231 » by dangermouse » Fri Feb 22, 2013 2:28 am

Fab Melo would have been as good as a 2nd rounder.

But then you think, well, we wouldn't have developed him anyway. Look at Seraphin. Tonnes of talent and he has barely developed his game past his hookshot and mid range jumper. Sure they have improved really well and his man defense is decent, but the guy still has no idea how to rebound, switch on defense or pass the ball out of the double team. Fab would stagnate here.

Who'd be a Wizards fan...
Image
long suffrin' boulez fan wrote:
NatP4 wrote:but why would the pacers want Mahinmi's contract


Well, in fairness, we took Mike Pence off their hands. Taking back Mahinmi is the least they can do.
User avatar
Chocolate City Jordanaire
RealGM
Posts: 55,607
And1: 10,870
Joined: Aug 05, 2001
       

Re: Big Balls traded to Boston for (almost) NOTHING 

Post#232 » by Chocolate City Jordanaire » Fri Feb 22, 2013 2:30 am

I didn't like Crawford's game. i wanted him traded. However, he improved enough this season (better passing, hit game winning shot at Portland again, operated in the team concept most of the time, got way better in PER and WS/48) I thought they could at least get a 2nd round pick for Jordan.

Since they dealt him for nothing, I hope on 4/7 when the Wizards play the Celtics that Crawford goes for 30+.
User avatar
SUPERBALLMAN
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,852
And1: 1,481
Joined: Aug 08, 2006
     

Re: Big Balls traded to Boston for (almost) NOTHING 

Post#233 » by SUPERBALLMAN » Fri Feb 22, 2013 2:34 am

There's a Pink Floyd song that perfectly captures the essence of being a Wizards fan.

It's called "Comfortably Numb".


I understand Crawford wanted out. But I am truly surprised they couldn't get more in return. Melo actually interested me because I thought Nene was the perfect mentor for him, and he could actually have some value as an asset with potential. I actually thought Crawford could get a late 1st round pick back, but it seems he couldn't even get back a late 2nd round pick or a future 2nd round pick.

I guess this sends a message to the team... If you play selfish then pout and complain you'll go to an actual NBA team with a proud history and headed to the playoffs.
"I love it when a plan comes together" - Colonel John "Hannibal" Smith
DCZards
RealGM
Posts: 11,238
And1: 5,109
Joined: Jul 16, 2005
Location: The Streets of DC
     

Re: Big Balls traded to Boston for (almost) NOTHING 

Post#234 » by DCZards » Fri Feb 22, 2013 2:37 am

JAR69 wrote:I don't get what all this complaining is about. JC is one of the least efficient players in the league, a shot-jacker who ruins the offensive flow and plays terrible defense. Don't you think GMs around the league know this, too? And he had become a cancer, interfering with the good team dynamic the Wizards have built. So the Wizards essentially cut him. And there is some value to eliminating his $2.2 million contract next year. While alone it doesn't open up any cap space, if we make other moves this summer (trade Okafor or Ariza), then that space will become valuable. Yes, I would have preferred a 2nd round pick as well, but we have no idea if anyone offered that.



....and on top of that...most players picked in the second rd turn out to be worthless, non contributors anyway.
hands11
Banned User
Posts: 31,171
And1: 2,444
Joined: May 16, 2005

Re: Big Balls traded to Boston for (almost) NOTHING 

Post#235 » by hands11 » Fri Feb 22, 2013 2:46 am

rockymac52 wrote:At least this opens up a lot more minutes for Cartier Martin whenever he's healthy enough to play again (should be soon, right?).


Oh Joy. Cartier Martin

I'll make sure I set my DVR now.
AFM
RealGM
Posts: 12,898
And1: 9,188
Joined: May 25, 2012
   

Re: Big Balls traded to Boston for (almost) NOTHING 

Post#236 » by AFM » Fri Feb 22, 2013 2:52 am

Hands, I had no idea Crawford was 3rd in PTS/ISO Possessions. We don't have anyone who can ISO now.
Who do we give the ball to when we're down 3 with 4 seconds left? Im not sure Beal has the handles yet.
hands11
Banned User
Posts: 31,171
And1: 2,444
Joined: May 16, 2005

Re: Big Balls traded to Boston for (almost) NOTHING 

Post#237 » by hands11 » Fri Feb 22, 2013 3:01 am

Chocolate City Jordanaire wrote:I didn't like Crawford's game. i wanted him traded. However, he improved enough this season (better passing, hit game winning shot at Portland again, operated in the team concept most of the time, got way better in PER and WS/48) I thought they could at least get a 2nd round pick for Jordan.

Since they dealt him for nothing, I hope on 4/7 when the Wizards play the Celtics that Crawford goes for 30+.


I want to see him go against Wall and school him.
hands11
Banned User
Posts: 31,171
And1: 2,444
Joined: May 16, 2005

Re: Big Balls traded to Boston for (almost) NOTHING 

Post#238 » by hands11 » Fri Feb 22, 2013 3:04 am

SUPERBALLMAN wrote:There's a Pink Floyd song that perfectly captures the essence of being a Wizards fan.

It's called "Comfortably Numb".


I understand Crawford wanted out. But I am truly surprised they couldn't get more in return. Melo actually interested me because I thought Nene was the perfect mentor for him, and he could actually have some value as an asset with potential. I actually thought Crawford could get a late 1st round pick back, but it seems he couldn't even get back a late 2nd round pick or a future 2nd round pick.

I guess this sends a message to the team... If you play selfish then pout and complain you'll go to an actual NBA team with a proud history and headed to the playoffs.


Seems we have established that. Not that I didn't like getting Nene for McGee but I'm sure McGee isn't all that upset getting paid and going to a playoff team.
User avatar
tontoz
RealGM
Posts: 21,555
And1: 5,718
Joined: Apr 11, 2005

Re: Big Balls traded to Boston for (almost) NOTHING 

Post#239 » by tontoz » Fri Feb 22, 2013 3:06 am

DCZards wrote:
....and on top of that...most players picked in the second rd turn out to be worthless, non contributors anyway.



That is certainly true when EG is making the picks. He has had high second rounders year after year and has nothing to show for them. Meanwhile other teams are finding useful players in the second round or even undrafted free agents. Just looking at teams we played this month....

Ersan
Isiah
Bledsoe
Singler
Novak
Amir Johnson
Monta Ellis
Deandre Jordan
Matt Barnes
Manu
GAry Neal
Danny Green

None of these guys was picked in the 1st round. There is value in the second round and smart GMs can find it. I would agree though that in the hands of EG a second round pick is basically worthless.
"bulky agile perimeter bone crunch pick setting draymond green" WizD
montestewart
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 14,846
And1: 7,982
Joined: Feb 25, 2009

Re: Big Balls traded to Boston for (almost) NOTHING 

Post#240 » by montestewart » Fri Feb 22, 2013 3:07 am

DCZards wrote:
JAR69 wrote:I don't get what all this complaining is about. JC is one of the least efficient players in the league, a shot-jacker who ruins the offensive flow and plays terrible defense. Don't you think GMs around the league know this, too? And he had become a cancer, interfering with the good team dynamic the Wizards have built. So the Wizards essentially cut him. And there is some value to eliminating his $2.2 million contract next year. While alone it doesn't open up any cap space, if we make other moves this summer (trade Okafor or Ariza), then that space will become valuable. Yes, I would have preferred a 2nd round pick as well, but we have no idea if anyone offered that.



....and on top of that...most players picked in the second rd turn out to be worthless, non contributors anyway.

And yet teams pay $2.5 million for them. Think of it as EG giving away money.

I have no idea if anyone offered a 2nd. Under different management, I imagine Crawford with higher trade value at the deadline. Under a different GM, I imagine higher return on that trade. It doesn't take a great imagination to see that, just a look at EG's track record. He's the perpetual sucker at the table. At this point in his career, EG becomes a punch line even when he makes relatively minor moves. He's the Inspector Clouseau of the NBA.

One bright side to this trade: dumping Crawford on the heels of dumping Mack perhaps shows Terd and Ernie slowly getting over their own brilliance in assembling the team's spectacular young core. They better be willing to go a little further, as I can't see this team going far with all four of Booker, Seraphin, Vesely, and Singleton still on the roster. I predict they will depart in ascending draft order (cause that's how they do), so Booker's next.

Return to Washington Wizards