ImageImageImageImageImage

Official Trade Thread - Part XXIX

Moderators: LyricalRico, nate33, montestewart

AFM
RealGM
Posts: 12,636
And1: 8,866
Joined: May 25, 2012
   

Re: Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXIX 

Post#281 » by AFM » Fri Mar 27, 2015 3:17 pm

Chocolate City Jordanaire wrote:
Induveca wrote:
Chocolate City Jordanaire wrote:Trade value of Porter is very low now thanks to Shaq.


Porter has just proven himself incapable of competing at this level. He's too weak, still looks overwhelmed 90% of the time. Considering he's been around the NBA for nearly 21 months now, he doesn't deserve anymore excuses.

Maybe he becomes an end of bench guy, but I really hope they find a way to trade him for some type of value. Beal/Porter/Gortat for Cousins/whatever works for me.

Ahh to dream of a Wall/Durant/Cousins combination.


Induveca, he really is weak as you say.

I won't write Otto Porter off. He started a game in which the Wizards won be 37 points. Otto has a high basketball IQ. He has a nice mid range stroke and three point range.

If I were coaching Porter would be the starting SF.

Noel looked like crap early on, too.

I hope you end up being right, but right now he has no 3 point range. Shooting 28% from 3.
And these are mostly wide open 3's.
User avatar
Chocolate City Jordanaire
RealGM
Posts: 54,953
And1: 10,524
Joined: Aug 05, 2001
       

Re: Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXIX 

Post#282 » by Chocolate City Jordanaire » Fri Mar 27, 2015 4:00 pm

fishercob wrote:
Induveca wrote:
fishercob wrote:
The numbers tell a different story. He's certainly not being put in positions to accentuate his strengths.


There comes a point when the "insufficient playing time" argument no longer suffices as an excuse. Over a long period of time, that lack of opportunity almost always points to being deemed inadequate to fulfill a job by peers and/or superiors.

That scenario adds a variable which disrupts the equations of Per 36 numbers etc, perception/reality (these two usually collide with time).

He has gotten progressively worse throughout the season. This after being exposed to NBA practice/workplace environment for 21 months. That's sufficient time to make a realistic judgment on his ceiling.


I'm not talking about playing time, even though that's an issue.

I'm talking about productivity metrics. Otto's ORtg is 105 and is WS/48 is .084. While neither of these numbers are exciting in and of themselves,there are more 20-22 year olds than you can count who were similarly or less productive and went on to really good careers.

I've been posting here for long enough that I think most will agree that I have never been a big "blame the coach" guy. But I can't look at Otto and the state of the Wizards and pretend it's not a significant developmental factor. We're talking about a guy that think Kevin Seraphin is good, that put Martell Webster on the ball in a critical end-of-game situation, that has no understanding or interest in basic math, etc.

So yeahm if Witt and Ernie stick around I think it's plenty likely that Otto won't amount to much. But his track record leads me to believe that he can grow into a very good NBA player with the right direction and development.


Agreed, fish. Nice post.

I don't totally blame the coach. At the same time if I were the GM I would fire this coach post haste.

Newman can be interim coach IF he starts Porter.

Make Butler and Webster each back up SG and SF. Rest Pierce every other game. Let Pierce play some stretch four.

At some point the Wizards need to release a player or deactivate a player or two. Roles are fuzzy and it's impossible to get good rotations out of this roster.

The Wizards acquired personality instead of functionality. Who can do what well? Shot blocker with quickness to show, hegde, recover. .. oops, they drafted the person of Georgetown University st SF, Otto Porter, instead of Nerlens Noel...
User avatar
Chocolate City Jordanaire
RealGM
Posts: 54,953
And1: 10,524
Joined: Aug 05, 2001
       

Re: Re: Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXIX 

Post#283 » by Chocolate City Jordanaire » Fri Mar 27, 2015 4:03 pm

AFM wrote:
Chocolate City Jordanaire wrote:
Induveca wrote:
Porter has just proven himself incapable of competing at this level. He's too weak, still looks overwhelmed 90% of the time. Considering he's been around the NBA for nearly 21 months now, he doesn't deserve anymore excuses.

Maybe he becomes an end of bench guy, but I really hope they find a way to trade him for some type of value. Beal/Porter/Gortat for Cousins/whatever works for me.

Ahh to dream of a Wall/Durant/Cousins combination.


Induveca, he really is weak as you say.

I won't write Otto Porter off. He started a game in which the Wizards won be 37 points. Otto has a high basketball IQ. He has a nice mid range stroke and three point range.

If I were coaching Porter would be the starting SF.

Noel looked like crap early on, too.

I hope you end up being right, but right now he has no 3 point range. Shooting 28% from 3.
And these are mostly wide open 3's.


It's hard to step into a shot with relaxed concentration and just let the shot flow when you cannot relax or concentrate. Who is most supportive of Otto Porter?

If Otto knows that Rasual Butler is better than he is how exactly does that help Otto's confidence?
User avatar
gambitx777
RealGM
Posts: 10,565
And1: 1,992
Joined: Dec 18, 2012

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXIX 

Post#284 » by gambitx777 » Sun Mar 29, 2015 9:28 am

I'm sorry, it's not Otto's fault that Randy is destroying his confidence. How can the kid focus when he knows that if he makes a a simple mistake that any one could make and that would be no issue for them, that he will get benched for it. Webseter continues to get playing time when he is playing like he has never touched a ball before. But Otto get's benched for trivial reasons. This is mind blowing too me. Play the kid, teach the kid, build him up. Don'e just piss on him for no reason.
User avatar
Dark Faze
Head Coach
Posts: 6,492
And1: 2,141
Joined: Dec 27, 2008

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXIX 

Post#285 » by Dark Faze » Sun Mar 29, 2015 3:35 pm

The Webster thing is terrible coaching. Plain and simple.
rl25g
Junior
Posts: 465
And1: 30
Joined: Jun 27, 2006
Location: DC
     

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXIX 

Post#286 » by rl25g » Mon Mar 30, 2015 1:50 am

Beal, Nene to PDX for

Batum, McCullom, Leonard, 2015 and 2017 1sts.

We sell high on Beal and get a legit 6th man, stretch 4 and 2 firsts. Not to mention a legit 2 way SF/SG in Batum.
PDX tries to get a second perimeter star in Beal.

Wall/McCulom/Sessions
Batum/McCullom/2015 1st
Porter/Pierce/Webster
Leonard/Humphries
Gortat/2015 1st/Blair
good basketball.. simple living.
User avatar
gambitx777
RealGM
Posts: 10,565
And1: 1,992
Joined: Dec 18, 2012

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXIX 

Post#287 » by gambitx777 » Mon Mar 30, 2015 8:30 am

rl25g wrote:Beal, Nene to PDX for

Batum, McCullom, Leonard, 2015 and 2017 1sts.

We sell high on Beal and get a legit 6th man, stretch 4 and 2 firsts. Not to mention a legit 2 way SF/SG in Batum.
PDX tries to get a second perimeter star in Beal.

Wall/McCulom/Sessions
Batum/McCullom/2015 1st
Porter/Pierce/Webster
Leonard/Humphries
Gortat/2015 1st/Blair

I feel like they wont give up that much for beal. Like, NENE has the value of being an exping but at the same time. IDK I feel like Batum Leonard and 2015 first is more likely.
LyricalRico
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 30,567
And1: 854
Joined: May 23, 2002
Location: Back into the fray!
Contact:
       

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXIX 

Post#288 » by LyricalRico » Mon Mar 30, 2015 2:10 pm

gambitx777 wrote:
rl25g wrote:Beal, Nene to PDX for

Batum, McCullom, Leonard, 2015 and 2017 1sts.

We sell high on Beal and get a legit 6th man, stretch 4 and 2 firsts. Not to mention a legit 2 way SF/SG in Batum.
PDX tries to get a second perimeter star in Beal.

Wall/McCulom/Sessions
Batum/McCullom/2015 1st
Porter/Pierce/Webster
Leonard/Humphries
Gortat/2015 1st/Blair

I feel like they wont give up that much for beal. Like, NENE has the value of being an exping but at the same time. IDK I feel like Batum Leonard and 2015 first is more likely.


Agreed, that package is too much from Portland's side. But take out the picks and you might have something. Or what about something like this:

Beal+Porter+Webster for Batum+McCollum+Leonard
AFM
RealGM
Posts: 12,636
And1: 8,866
Joined: May 25, 2012
   

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXIX 

Post#289 » by AFM » Mon Mar 30, 2015 2:19 pm

LyricalRico wrote:
gambitx777 wrote:
rl25g wrote:Beal, Nene to PDX for

Batum, McCullom, Leonard, 2015 and 2017 1sts.

We sell high on Beal and get a legit 6th man, stretch 4 and 2 firsts. Not to mention a legit 2 way SF/SG in Batum.
PDX tries to get a second perimeter star in Beal.

Wall/McCulom/Sessions
Batum/McCullom/2015 1st
Porter/Pierce/Webster
Leonard/Humphries
Gortat/2015 1st/Blair

I feel like they wont give up that much for beal. Like, NENE has the value of being an exping but at the same time. IDK I feel like Batum Leonard and 2015 first is more likely.


Agreed, that package is too much from Portland's side. But take out the picks and you might have something. Or what about something like this:

Beal+Porter+Webster for Batum+McCollum+Leonard


Image

Absolutely not. Is this a joke?

Trade our two young assets for an overrated SF who can't shoot (40% and 30% from 3), a backup G probably destined to be a career journeyman, and an average at best backup C.
LyricalRico
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 30,567
And1: 854
Joined: May 23, 2002
Location: Back into the fray!
Contact:
       

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXIX 

Post#290 » by LyricalRico » Mon Mar 30, 2015 2:35 pm

^ Depends on how you feel about Beal and Porter. It also leaves Nene available to include in a Kevin Love trade. Put it in whatever combinations you want (Beal+filler for Batum and Nene+Porter for Love, or anything else) but we'd end up like this:

Gortat/Leonard
Love/Hump
Batum/FA
2015 first/McCollum
Wall/Sessions
payitforward
RealGM
Posts: 24,858
And1: 9,233
Joined: May 02, 2012
Location: On the Atlantic

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXIX 

Post#291 » by payitforward » Mon Mar 30, 2015 3:02 pm

AFM wrote:
LyricalRico wrote:
gambitx777 wrote:I feel like they wont give up that much for beal. Like, NENE has the value of being an exping but at the same time. IDK I feel like Batum Leonard and 2015 first is more likely.


Agreed, that package is too much from Portland's side. But take out the picks and you might have something. Or what about something like this:

Beal+Porter+Webster for Batum+McCollum+Leonard

Absolutely not. Is this a joke?

Trade our two young assets for an overrated SF who can't shoot (40% and 30% from 3), a backup G probably destined to be a career journeyman, and an average at best backup C.

You undervalue Batum and Leonard. And McCollum is worth more than Webster (that's obvious to me). But I can't see the trade in any case. Aldridge and Lopez both expire this year; they're not trading Leonard.

A trade that includes Nene would be great, but the original suggestion above is... ridiculous. Would be great for us of course.

We could have drafted Batum. Hell, we probably could have traded down w/ Portland in the '12 draft and picked Lillard and Leonard!

The best way to get good young players is to draft them.
User avatar
Chocolate City Jordanaire
RealGM
Posts: 54,953
And1: 10,524
Joined: Aug 05, 2001
       

 

Post#292 » by Chocolate City Jordanaire » Mon Mar 30, 2015 3:45 pm

I say trade Randy Wittman for Don Newman. Let's see the same players under a different leader. Let them play harder and hopefully smarter through the playoffs.

Wait to decide what trades make sense.

Right now I think Gortat (not on the same page as Wall), Webster, and possibly Beal (because of his leg issues) are players to trade.

I don't expect Pierce will return.

Nene's contract is now a very attractive one to deal.

I want to make sure that Wittman is not making some players worse before making trade ideas.
AFM
RealGM
Posts: 12,636
And1: 8,866
Joined: May 25, 2012
   

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXIX 

Post#293 » by AFM » Mon Mar 30, 2015 3:47 pm

payitforward wrote:
AFM wrote:
LyricalRico wrote:
Agreed, that package is too much from Portland's side. But take out the picks and you might have something. Or what about something like this:

Beal+Porter+Webster for Batum+McCollum+Leonard

Absolutely not. Is this a joke?

Trade our two young assets for an overrated SF who can't shoot (40% and 30% from 3), a backup G probably destined to be a career journeyman, and an average at best backup C.

You undervalue Batum and Leonard. And McCollum is worth more than Webster (that's obvious to me). But I can't see the trade in any case. Aldridge and Lopez both expire this year; they're not trading Leonard.

A trade that includes Nene would be great, but the original suggestion above is... ridiculous. Would be great for us of course.

We could have drafted Batum. Hell, we probably could have traded down w/ Portland in the '12 draft and picked Lillard and Leonard!

The best way to get good young players is to draft them.

I've thought Batum has been overrated on this board (actually mostly on bulletsforever, if you post there) for a few years now. His PER of 12 doesn't impress me, neither does his 30% from 3.

You're right, the best way to get good young players is to draft them. Also, pretty important that you don't trade said young players 2 years after doing so.
jivelikenice
Analyst
Posts: 3,074
And1: 145
Joined: Jul 15, 2005

Re: 

Post#294 » by jivelikenice » Mon Mar 30, 2015 9:36 pm

Chocolate City Jordanaire wrote:I say trade Randy Wittman for Don Newman. Let's see the same players under a different leader. Let them play harder and hopefully smarter through the playoffs.

Wait to decide what trades make sense.

Right now I think Gortat (not on the same page as Wall), Webster, and possibly Beal (because of his leg issues) are players to trade.

I don't expect Pierce will return.

Nene's contract is now a very attractive one to deal.

I want to make sure that Wittman is not making some players worse before making trade ideas.


I like Newman and would like to retain him but I don't want them to promote him to HC. This team needs signature move. The Wizards have been a 2nd tier team for years. Time for them to do something big and make a signature HC hire. I wrote this piece.

http://wizofawes.com/2015/03/26/why-was ... -calipari/

Every hire is not only about getting the right X's and O's guy. Sometimes its about the package deal. The Wizards need to make a move to put them on the map. I have no idea if Calipari does really want to go to the Pros, but I'd rank my preferences as 1. Calipari, 2. Ollie, 3. D'antoni (w/Newman)
User avatar
Chocolate City Jordanaire
RealGM
Posts: 54,953
And1: 10,524
Joined: Aug 05, 2001
       

 

Post#295 » by Chocolate City Jordanaire » Mon Mar 30, 2015 10:35 pm

Interim coach for 10 games and playoffs is all I had in mind.

Then a new GM needs to hire a whole new coaching staff. Retain Newman, as an assistant only, if he works well with the remaining players.
User avatar
Dark Faze
Head Coach
Posts: 6,492
And1: 2,141
Joined: Dec 27, 2008

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXIX 

Post#296 » by Dark Faze » Tue Mar 31, 2015 12:02 am

Ted gonna pull off the rare interim, interim coach with the same coaching staff.
User avatar
Earth2Ted
Junior
Posts: 408
And1: 58
Joined: Jan 21, 2012

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXIX 

Post#297 » by Earth2Ted » Tue Mar 31, 2015 10:50 am

I think my trade idea of getting Brook Lopez for Gortat and Porter would be looking pretty good right now. Lopez just got named EC player of the week, he's averaging 29, 9, and 2 blocks a game the last 6 or so games, the nets are 7-3 in their last 10, including a win over Cleveland, and are right there for the last playoff spot.

Of course, with our luck (and our crack front office/coaching staff), he would have broken his foot again, or Randy would've have just parked his butt on the bench during the 4th quarter in favor of Seraphin... :-?
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 70,602
And1: 23,070
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXIX 

Post#298 » by nate33 » Tue Mar 31, 2015 12:42 pm

Earth2Ted wrote:I think my trade idea of getting Brook Lopez for Gortat and Porter would be looking pretty good right now. Lopez just got named EC player of the week, he's averaging 29, 9, and 2 blocks a game the last 6 or so games, the nets are 7-3 in their last 10, including a win over Cleveland, and are right there for the last playoff spot.

Of course, with our luck (and our crack front office/coaching staff), he would have broken his foot again, or Randy would've have just parked his butt on the bench during the 4th quarter in favor of Seraphin... :-?

It would definitely be looking good right now, but will you be able to say that next year? I just don't trust Lopez to stay healthy. Avoid 7-footers with foot problems like the plague.
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 70,602
And1: 23,070
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: 

Post#299 » by nate33 » Tue Mar 31, 2015 12:55 pm

Chocolate City Jordanaire wrote:I say trade Randy Wittman for Don Newman. Let's see the same players under a different leader. Let them play harder and hopefully smarter through the playoffs.

Wait to decide what trades make sense.

Right now I think Gortat (not on the same page as Wall), Webster, and possibly Beal (because of his leg issues) are players to trade.

I don't expect Pierce will return.

Nene's contract is now a very attractive one to deal.

I want to make sure that Wittman is not making some players worse before making trade ideas.

Since when is Gortat not on the same page as Wall? They had one miscommunication last game. Big deal. I think Wittman and Gortat aren't on the same page, but I've seen no indication that Wall and Gortat are having any trouble. I think Wall and Gortat are a rock solid combination. They're the most consistent players on the team.

Get them a stretch four to space the floor and you'll see Wall averaging 18 and 11 and Gortat averaging 16 and 10. Also, let's not overlook Gortat's durability. He played 81 games last year (the missed game was a suspension) and he's on pace for 82 this year. That's a really big deal for a high-minute center. I'm not interested in pursuing a Gortat trade. He's not untouchable or anything, but I'm pretty happy with him.

I'd entertain trading Beal only because I believe his trade value is higher than his actual value. I've got no problems with the guy. He's a good fit with good character, but there's no reason not to at least test the market given his impending contract expiration.

Obviously, it would be nice to move Webster, but nobody wants him right now. We'd have to sacrifice quite a bit to offload him. At this point, I think we're better off hoping that his back improves and that he can improve his trade value by the Trade Deadline next year. He needs to miss 16 more games for his contract to become voidable.
nuposse04
RealGM
Posts: 11,312
And1: 2,468
Joined: Jul 20, 2004
Location: on a rock
   

Re: Official Trade Thread - Part XXIX 

Post#300 » by nuposse04 » Tue Mar 31, 2015 1:49 pm

Speaking of trade assets, w/e happened to blair? With Bigs injured its a helluva time to miss 3 games due to personal reasons. Stranger yet we don't know why. Hope all is well with him.

Return to Washington Wizards