ImageImageImageImageImage

2025 Draft Thread - Part 3

Moderators: nate33, montestewart, LyricalRico

closg00
RealGM
Posts: 23,989
And1: 4,246
Joined: Nov 21, 2004

Re: 2025 Draft Thread - Part 3 

Post#361 » by closg00 » Yesterday 2:06 pm

Dat2U wrote:
nate33 wrote:
9 and 20 wrote:Looks like Essengue might be a top 5 or 6 pick now. Super young, productive, good size.

His measurements haven't changed much since the last time.

Last year, he measured 6'-9" barefoot with a 6'-11" wingspan and a 9'-3.25" standing reach. He was 198 pounds.

He has gained an inch in height an 1.75 inches in wingspan, but lost 1.5 inches in standing reach (probably because he tanked it to boost his vertical leap numbers). My guess is most of the wingspan improvement was his torso filling out a bit as he matured.

I think he's an interesting high upside gamble, but I don't really think these measurements place him firmly in the top 6. I think he could go anywhere between 6 and 20.


The production at his age is impressive. He seems to have good feel. An event creator defensively and a monster in transition. He scores on timely cuts to the rim to the dunker's spot, the ocassional open 3, putbacks on offensive rebounds & of course, on the break. Apparently his combination of length & athleticism make him tougb to stop on the move leading to a jaw dropping foul rate.

So he excels and has mastered the 'edges' of the game to be productive at a young age in his league. The C length & wing mobility give you hope as a switchable big capable of guarding all 5 positions.

The 'meat' of his game is light on substance however. The handle is basic and he doesn't look comfortable with it. He can attack some closeouts although alot of his limited forays to the basket are mostly of him backing people down. The shooting is built around his willingness to shoot them despite low %s. The form looks slow but he's not really being guarded so its not an issue yet. His passing is interesting and he does offer some promise to eventually provide connective passing. Defensively, he can be disruptive but consistency & attention to detail has been an issue but at 18 those things can improve. I just think he's an underskilled F or a wispy C project that must refine his skill or be destined to be a backup energy big stuck b/w positions.


Essengue reminds me of Bilal, but with even poorer handles and shooting, late 1st round pick if at all for me.
dckingsfan
RealGM
Posts: 33,355
And1: 18,950
Joined: May 28, 2010

Re: 2025 Draft Thread - Part 3 

Post#362 » by dckingsfan » Yesterday 3:33 pm

closg00 wrote:
Dat2U wrote:
nate33 wrote:His measurements haven't changed much since the last time.

Last year, he measured 6'-9" barefoot with a 6'-11" wingspan and a 9'-3.25" standing reach. He was 198 pounds.

He has gained an inch in height an 1.75 inches in wingspan, but lost 1.5 inches in standing reach (probably because he tanked it to boost his vertical leap numbers). My guess is most of the wingspan improvement was his torso filling out a bit as he matured.

I think he's an interesting high upside gamble, but I don't really think these measurements place him firmly in the top 6. I think he could go anywhere between 6 and 20.


The production at his age is impressive. He seems to have good feel. An event creator defensively and a monster in transition. He scores on timely cuts to the rim to the dunker's spot, the ocassional open 3, putbacks on offensive rebounds & of course, on the break. Apparently his combination of length & athleticism make him tougb to stop on the move leading to a jaw dropping foul rate.

So he excels and has mastered the 'edges' of the game to be productive at a young age in his league. The C length & wing mobility give you hope as a switchable big capable of guarding all 5 positions.

The 'meat' of his game is light on substance however. The handle is basic and he doesn't look comfortable with it. He can attack some closeouts although alot of his limited forays to the basket are mostly of him backing people down. The shooting is built around his willingness to shoot them despite low %s. The form looks slow but he's not really being guarded so its not an issue yet. His passing is interesting and he does offer some promise to eventually provide connective passing. Defensively, he can be disruptive but consistency & attention to detail has been an issue but at 18 those things can improve. I just think he's an underskilled F or a wispy C project that must refine his skill or be destined to be a backup energy big stuck b/w positions.

Essengue reminds me of Bilal, but with even poorer handles and shooting, late 1st round pick if at all for me.

Funny, he doesn't remind me of Bilal at all, of course - I don't see Bilal becoming a stretch 5 in time. I see Bilal as a wing and Essengue as a big.
closg00
RealGM
Posts: 23,989
And1: 4,246
Joined: Nov 21, 2004

Re: 2025 Draft Thread - Part 3 

Post#363 » by closg00 » Yesterday 4:04 pm

dckingsfan wrote:
closg00 wrote:
Dat2U wrote:
The production at his age is impressive. He seems to have good feel. An event creator defensively and a monster in transition. He scores on timely cuts to the rim to the dunker's spot, the ocassional open 3, putbacks on offensive rebounds & of course, on the break. Apparently his combination of length & athleticism make him tougb to stop on the move leading to a jaw dropping foul rate.

So he excels and has mastered the 'edges' of the game to be productive at a young age in his league. The C length & wing mobility give you hope as a switchable big capable of guarding all 5 positions.

The 'meat' of his game is light on substance however. The handle is basic and he doesn't look comfortable with it. He can attack some closeouts although alot of his limited forays to the basket are mostly of him backing people down. The shooting is built around his willingness to shoot them despite low %s. The form looks slow but he's not really being guarded so its not an issue yet. His passing is interesting and he does offer some promise to eventually provide connective passing. Defensively, he can be disruptive but consistency & attention to detail has been an issue but at 18 those things can improve. I just think he's an underskilled F or a wispy C project that must refine his skill or be destined to be a backup energy big stuck b/w positions.

Essengue reminds me of Bilal, but with even poorer handles and shooting, late 1st round pick if at all for me.

Funny, he doesn't remind me of Bilal at all, of course - I don't see Bilal becoming a stretch 5 in time. I see Bilal as a wing and Essengue as a big.


:gossip: I don't see Essengue becoming a stretch 5 :-? Both are primarily floor runners and slashers looking for dunks and put-backs, they will shoot sometimes, but it's ugly. I am extremely skeptical of most of these Frenchies transitioning to the NBA, but it happens.
dckingsfan
RealGM
Posts: 33,355
And1: 18,950
Joined: May 28, 2010

Re: 2025 Draft Thread - Part 3 

Post#364 » by dckingsfan » Yesterday 4:08 pm

closg00 wrote:
dckingsfan wrote:
closg00 wrote:Essengue reminds me of Bilal, but with even poorer handles and shooting, late 1st round pick if at all for me.

Funny, he doesn't remind me of Bilal at all, of course - I don't see Bilal becoming a stretch 5 in time. I see Bilal as a wing and Essengue as a big.

:gossip: I don't see Essengue becoming a stretch 5 :-? Both are primarily floor runners and slashers looking for dunks and put-backs, they will shoot sometimes, but it's ugly. I am extremely skeptical of most of these Frenchies transitioning to the NBA, but it happens.

:wink: but yeah, I am pretty skeptical of Sarr, Essengue and Bilal all for different reasons. But I guess that is just being a young player. Since we have two of them, I am irrationally cheering for them.

Agreed that if you don't buy into Essengue as a big, you don't draft him.
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 69,294
And1: 21,758
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: 2025 Draft Thread - Part 3 

Post#365 » by nate33 » Yesterday 5:56 pm

Read on Twitter


Absolutely wretched lane agility and 3/4 sprint numbers, but the standing vertical and max vertical numbers are really quite good for a guy who weighs 219. He outleaps VJ Edgecombe in the standing vertical, and is only 2 inches shy of VJ's max vertical, despite carrying 30 extra pounds.

And looking at the anthro measurements, I don't think Kon tanked the standing reach measurement to inflate his vertical numbers. Kon's standing reach is in line with a bunch of guys who are a bit shorter than Kon but with a longer wingspan.
NatP4
RealGM
Posts: 14,548
And1: 5,824
Joined: Jul 24, 2016
         

Re: 2025 Draft Thread - Part 3 

Post#366 » by NatP4 » Yesterday 6:58 pm

Think chances are high that we are in a bidding war with Charlotte for VJ.

Dallas: Flagg
SA: Harper
Washington: VJ
Charlotte: Kon
Utah: Ace
Philly: Tre
NOP: Fears
BKN: Jakucionis
TOR: Maluach
Houston: who the hell knows?
Portland: Carter Bryant

I’m not totally convinced that VJ is worth trading up for. Seems like a high injury risk kind of player, the lack of wing size/length is pretty limiting in terms of primary option/all star potential.
WizarDynasty
Veteran
Posts: 2,577
And1: 248
Joined: Oct 23, 2003

Re: 2025 Draft Thread - Part 3 

Post#367 » by WizarDynasty » Yesterday 8:06 pm

NatP4 wrote:Think chances are high that we are in a bidding war with Charlotte for VJ.

Dallas: Flagg
SA: Harper
Washington: VJ
Charlotte: Kon
Utah: Ace
Philly: Tre
NOP: Fears
BKN: Jakucionis
TOR: Maluach
Houston: who the hell knows?
Portland: Carter Bryant

I’m not totally convinced that VJ is worth trading up for. Seems like a high injury risk kind of player, the lack of wing size/length is pretty limiting in terms of primary option/all star potential.

i do like edgecomb better than all the other guards. If we had an opportunity to trade up and get him for a 2nd rounder, i would consider.
Build your team w/5 shooters using P. Pierce Form deeply bent hips and lower back arch at same time. before rising into shot. Elbow not pointing to the ground! Good teams have an engine player that shoot volume (2000 full season) at 50 percent.Large Hands
closg00
RealGM
Posts: 23,989
And1: 4,246
Joined: Nov 21, 2004

Re: 2025 Draft Thread - Part 3 

Post#368 » by closg00 » Yesterday 8:23 pm

badinage
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,711
And1: 1,194
Joined: May 09, 2002

Re: 2025 Draft Thread - Part 3 

Post#369 » by badinage » Yesterday 11:34 pm

NatP4 wrote:Think chances are high that we are in a bidding war with Charlotte for VJ.

Dallas: Flagg
SA: Harper
Washington: VJ
Charlotte: Kon
Utah: Ace
Philly: Tre
NOP: Fears
BKN: Jakucionis
TOR: Maluach
Houston: who the hell knows?
Portland: Carter Bryant

I’m not totally convinced that VJ is worth trading up for. Seems like a high injury risk kind of player, the lack of wing size/length is pretty limiting in terms of primary option/all star potential.


Interesting. What makes you think that they’re in a bidding war?
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 69,294
And1: 21,758
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: 2025 Draft Thread - Part 3 

Post#370 » by nate33 » Yesterday 11:54 pm

badinage wrote:
NatP4 wrote:Think chances are high that we are in a bidding war with Charlotte for VJ.

Dallas: Flagg
SA: Harper
Washington: VJ
Charlotte: Kon
Utah: Ace
Philly: Tre
NOP: Fears
BKN: Jakucionis
TOR: Maluach
Houston: who the hell knows?
Portland: Carter Bryant

I’m not totally convinced that VJ is worth trading up for. Seems like a high injury risk kind of player, the lack of wing size/length is pretty limiting in terms of primary option/all star potential.


Interesting. What makes you think that they’re in a bidding war?


I'm mostly assuming that all information leaked from various terms is nothing but misinformation. The only "rumors" I even remotely heed are the ones that line up with the teams' actual needs. For example, I tend to discount the Philly rumor that they love VJ, because their depth chart indicates they have plenty of guards and are in dire need of forwards. On the other hand, the rumor that San Antonio is listening to Harper trade ideas makes perfect sense since they already have Fox and Castle.
User avatar
tontoz
RealGM
Posts: 19,888
And1: 4,765
Joined: Apr 11, 2005

Re: 2025 Draft Thread - Part 3 

Post#371 » by tontoz » Today 12:02 am

Draft day is going to be nuts.
"bulky agile perimeter bone crunch pick setting draymond green" WizD
NatP4
RealGM
Posts: 14,548
And1: 5,824
Joined: Jul 24, 2016
         

Re: 2025 Draft Thread - Part 3 

Post#372 » by NatP4 » Today 1:02 am

badinage wrote:Interesting. What makes you think that they’re in a bidding war?


Mostly just playing a guessing game with the reports/smokescreen stuff out there. In combination with team needs and a few things I have heard.

The Philly reports about a “private workout” and Maxey attending, and “Philly loves the fit between VJ and Maxey in the backcourt” seem like obvious smoke.

Meanwhile, reports about multiple teams being interested in trading up for Edgecombe&Philly looking to move down/interest in Tre Johnson&*possibly* interest in Ace.
payitforward
RealGM
Posts: 23,990
And1: 8,766
Joined: May 02, 2012
Location: On the Atlantic

Re: 2025 Draft Thread - Part 3 

Post#373 » by payitforward » Today 1:11 am

Coming out of high school, Edgecombe was #4 on the RSCI top 100 prospects. Carrington was nowhere on the previous year's list.

Edgecombe had a *much* better Freshman college season than Bub.

If we draft Edgecombe, does this reflect on Bub's future as a Wizard?
User avatar
gesa2
Rookie
Posts: 1,203
And1: 364
Joined: Jun 21, 2007
Location: Warwick MD
       

Re: 2025 Draft Thread - Part 3 

Post#374 » by gesa2 » Today 2:45 am

payitforward wrote:Coming out of high school, Edgecombe was #4 on the RSCI top 100 prospects. Carrington was nowhere on the previous year's list.

Edgecombe had a *much* better Freshman college season than Bub.

If we draft Edgecombe, does this reflect on Bub's future as a Wizard?

Maybe, but there’s a lot of developmental water to go under the bridge first. Two tickets that we like (maybe more with AJ on the team as well) on the “what will they be at age 25?” lottery.
I like Bub a lot but there is no one on our team that should keep us from drafting BPA. We can trade Poole if we need to have plenty of minutes for everyone.
Making extreme statements like "only" sounds like there are "no" Jokics in this draft? Jokic is an engine that was drafted in the 2nd round. Always a chance to see diamond dropped by sloppy burgular after a theft.
-WizD
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 69,294
And1: 21,758
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: 2025 Draft Thread - Part 3 

Post#375 » by nate33 » Today 3:40 am

payitforward wrote:Coming out of high school, Edgecombe was #4 on the RSCI top 100 prospects. Carrington was nowhere on the previous year's list.

Edgecombe had a *much* better Freshman college season than Bub.

If we draft Edgecombe, does this reflect on Bub's future as a Wizard?

I don't think so. Both Edgecombe and Bub have enough height and length to play either the 1 or the 2. I actually think they are pretty complementary, with Bub being the cerebral game manager PG who will take care of the ball and hit perimeter shots, and Edgecombe being the aggressive slasher and defensive stopper at SG.

Maybe down the road, after several years of development, Edgecombe will develop enough ball skills and game management skills to become the full time point guard, which might make Carrington less important. At that point, we might be better off swapping Carrington for a bigger, more versatile wing defender. But I think for the next several years, Edgecombe will not supplant Carrington as the PG.
NatP4
RealGM
Posts: 14,548
And1: 5,824
Joined: Jul 24, 2016
         

Re: 2025 Draft Thread - Part 3 

Post#376 » by NatP4 » Today 4:30 am

payitforward wrote:Per Givony, Maluach & Traore does make sense. A big talent add in that pair! Ditto if it were to be McNeeley at 18 instead pf Traore.

Their big board shows Johni Broome still available at 40. IMO, he's an absolutely can't-miss NBA prospect, a guy who's going to have a long, productive career in the league. Not a star, not a primary scorer, but a stud all the same.

As an alternative to Broome, Woo pencils in Toohey. Anyone have a take on him?


I think Toohey is a guy you have to go get if he falls anywhere in the range of #40(maybe even at #18).

You see lazy Andrei Kirilenko comparisons all the time, but Toohey reminds me a bit of him. Not really vertically explosive, but he’s still an explosive athlete with his strength/agility/quick twitch. Smartest player on the court at all times.

It would be pretty shocking if he doesn’t turn out to be a quality NBA player, especially after measuring in at 6’9 with a 6’11 wingspan. He’s got legit NBA 3/4 size.

Home run draft for me, is trading 6 for 8&27 and picking CMB&Richardson at 8&18, and making sure you can get Toohey at 27.

Return to Washington Wizards