ImageImageImageImageImage

2011 DRAFT blather goes here. Part 3...

Moderators: LyricalRico, nate33, montestewart

User avatar
GhostsOfGil
General Manager
Posts: 8,506
And1: 899
Joined: Jul 06, 2006

Re: 2011 DRAFT blather goes here. Part 3... 

Post#381 » by GhostsOfGil » Thu May 19, 2011 3:48 pm

nate33 wrote:Mock Draft Summaries:

David Aldridge
6. Washington: Markieff Morris


Draft Express:
8. Detroit: Enes Kanter

:o
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 70,602
And1: 23,070
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: 2011 DRAFT blather goes here. Part 3... 

Post#382 » by nate33 » Thu May 19, 2011 3:50 pm

A couple of comments on those mock drafts:

* Irving and Williams are 1-2 in every mock.

* Every mock except Aldridge's has a PG going in the top 5, Aldrige has Vesely in the top 5.

* Draft Express has two PG's in the top 5.

* All mocks have Valanciunas gone by the time we pick.

* In all mocks, Biyombo is on the board when we pick. In the DX mock, Biyombo and Kanter available.

* We can have any non-PG NCAA player we want except Derrick Williams.
Ruzious
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 47,909
And1: 11,582
Joined: Jul 17, 2001
       

Re: 2011 DRAFT blather goes here. Part 3... 

Post#383 » by Ruzious » Thu May 19, 2011 3:51 pm

Interesting that pretty much every mock has Kanter going 4. If Utah's smart, they trade Jefferson and pick Kanter.

Gotta like Aldridge for thinking outside the box on his draft, while others go the cookie cutter route. I wonder if Haslem's showing in the playoffs affects where Markieff Morris goes - since he's that type of PF.
"A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools." - Douglas Adams
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 70,602
And1: 23,070
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: 2011 DRAFT blather goes here. Part 3... 

Post#384 » by nate33 » Thu May 19, 2011 4:03 pm

So the consensus is this:

Top 2:
Irving
Williams

Picks 3-5:
Knight
Kanter
Valanciunas

After that, it's wide open. Walker, Vesely and Leonard make the top 10 in 4 out 5 mocks. Thompson, Biyombo and Burks make the top 10 in 3 out of 5 mocks (though Burks never gets above 10).
User avatar
NbdyBeatsTheWiz
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,703
And1: 105
Joined: Apr 10, 2008
Location: Newport News, VA

Re: 2011 DRAFT blather goes here. Part 3... 

Post#385 » by NbdyBeatsTheWiz » Thu May 19, 2011 4:11 pm

Ruzious wrote:
NbdyBeatsTheWiz wrote:Bismack reminds me more of a very poor man/short man's Dwight at this point. He'll take just as long to develop his post moves, and he's starting at (assumed) a later age.

I've been talkin him up as a better Ibaka with my bud, that's more likely IMO.

But still, at 6, I want him over all else.

Best comp to me for BB is a young McDyess with a little more bulk - when he was at Alabama.



If he went on to develop a midrange jumper like McDyess did that'd be phenomenal.
popper
Veteran
Posts: 2,867
And1: 405
Joined: Jun 19, 2010

Re: 2011 DRAFT blather goes here. Part 3... 

Post#386 » by popper » Thu May 19, 2011 4:14 pm

TGW wrote:
popper wrote:Take BB at 6 if he's still available. He reminds me so much of Olajuwon. Atheletes like him don't come around often. He looks like he can play both the 4 and the 5.


Olajuwon? Really? Olajuwon is arguably the most skilled lowpost bigman in NBA history.

Biyombo is about as close to Olajuwon as McGee is to Wilt Chamberlain.


I'm comparing them at their pre-nba potential. You are comparing BB to the second half of Olajuwans very long NBA career. You would have said the same thing comparing Olajuwan as a rookie to Bill Russell in his prime. Not a fair comparison.
popper
Veteran
Posts: 2,867
And1: 405
Joined: Jun 19, 2010

Re: 2011 DRAFT blather goes here. Part 3... 

Post#387 » by popper » Thu May 19, 2011 4:35 pm

Our glaring team needs are rebounding, interior toughness and protecting the rim. Those are BB's strengths. I would love to experiment with a second-string front line of BB at 4, Seraphon at 5 and Booker at 3. It would be highly entertaining and since we're not going to compete for a championship next year anyway, why not?
closg00
RealGM
Posts: 24,700
And1: 4,557
Joined: Nov 21, 2004

Re: 2011 DRAFT blather goes here. Part 3... 

Post#388 » by closg00 » Thu May 19, 2011 4:36 pm

I encourage anyone who is serious about taking BB @ 6, to watch the Nike Summit game. BB has the tools, but he isn't much of a basketball player yet despite the nice workout video.
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 70,602
And1: 23,070
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: 2011 DRAFT blather goes here. Part 3... 

Post#389 » by nate33 » Thu May 19, 2011 4:48 pm

popper wrote:Our glaring team needs are rebounding, interior toughness and protecting the rim. Those are BB's strengths. I would love to experiment with a second-string front line of BB at 4, Seraphon at 5 and Booker at 3. It would be highly entertaining and since we're not going to compete for a championship next year anyway, why not?

Well, we also have glaring needs in shooting and low post offense. Those are his weaknesses.
User avatar
J-Blaze
Freshman
Posts: 62
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 05, 2011

Re: 2011 DRAFT blather goes here. Part 3... 

Post#390 » by J-Blaze » Thu May 19, 2011 4:50 pm

if jan vesley is a really good shooter and not just a dunker, ill take him
i still love my team no matter what.

DRAFT JEREMY LAMB!!
User avatar
gesa2
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,275
And1: 405
Joined: Jun 21, 2007
Location: Warwick MD
       

Re: 2011 DRAFT blather goes here. Part 3... 

Post#391 » by gesa2 » Thu May 19, 2011 4:53 pm

Watching the Bulls the last 2 games makes me feel better about SIngleton and Leonard. Play d, and chuck the ball up there; so long as we get offensive rebounds on 30% of missed shots we'll be OK!
Making extreme statements like "only" sounds like there are "no" Jokics in this draft? Jokic is an engine that was drafted in the 2nd round. Always a chance to see diamond dropped by sloppy burgular after a theft.
-WizD
User avatar
gesa2
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,275
And1: 405
Joined: Jun 21, 2007
Location: Warwick MD
       

Re: 2011 DRAFT blather goes here. Part 3... 

Post#392 » by gesa2 » Thu May 19, 2011 4:55 pm

J-Blaze wrote:if jan vesley is a really good shooter and not just a dunker, ill take him


Problem here is there's no evidence for him being a good shooter..
Making extreme statements like "only" sounds like there are "no" Jokics in this draft? Jokic is an engine that was drafted in the 2nd round. Always a chance to see diamond dropped by sloppy burgular after a theft.
-WizD
Black Eyed Sooz
Sophomore
Posts: 129
And1: 0
Joined: Nov 30, 2010

Re: 2011 DRAFT blather goes here. Part 3... 

Post#393 » by Black Eyed Sooz » Thu May 19, 2011 4:59 pm

TGW wrote:Admittedly, Biyombo looks wayyyyy more skilled than I gave him credit for. Obviously, they were showing all his swishes and not his bricks/airballs, but the follow through is there. The skill is there.

I'm starting to think our choices aren't as bad as I thought they were before.


Agreed. He's got good coordination, he looks very ambidextrous, and his form on his jumper is really pretty decent- and if you're going to project a "bad numbers/good form" guy like Vesely to be a scorer based on that, why not Biyombo?

If you watch the Nike Hoops Summit game, you will see that despite his lack of scoring touch, the US team doubled him immediately whenever he got the ball in the post, so they at least had some respect for his ability to put the ball in the hole.

I think he'd be a great fit for the Wiz- and add to that how he is a natural leader and a physical player out on the court as well. Granted we'd have a hole to fill in the skills and scoring department- but there are a truckload of guys coming in the 2012 draft that can fill it up.
popper
Veteran
Posts: 2,867
And1: 405
Joined: Jun 19, 2010

Re: 2011 DRAFT blather goes here. Part 3... 

Post#394 » by popper » Thu May 19, 2011 5:03 pm

I'm not saying Vesely is a bum but do we want a small forward with the following weaknesses?


From DraftExpress

Vesely continues to struggle in many of the same areas we outlined in previous reports, and it's still difficult to say that he's an overly skilled player.

His ball-handling skills remain mediocre at best. Watching him handle the ball in the open floor is definitely not a pretty sight. He's able to beat his defender off the dribble at times with his first step, but it's still something of an adventure for him trying to create his own shot from the perimeter—you just never know how things are going to turn out. He's not someone you want making decisions with the ball. His feel for the game is just average and it's not rare to see him make bad decisions, particularly in the form of unnecessary turnovers.

If unable to convert with a dunk around the rim, Vesely still has problems finishing through contact due to a distinct lack of strength. He doesn't put good touch on his shots and is definitely not the most fluid or instinctive offensive player you'll find. Many times he seems to just throw the ball up on the rim hoping for the best.

Even with his prodigious athleticism, Vesely still isn't much of a presence on the glass. He grabs just one defensive rebound for every 10 ½ minutes he's on the court, which is a very poor rate. It's here that his lack of girth and poor instincts seem to show the most. He's too skinny to put a body on opponents, and he doesn't pursue the ball off the rim the way you might hope.

Defense is the part of Vesely's game that is most likely to spark debate when it comes to his future. On one hand, you cannot ignore the terrific physical tools Vesely enjoys – his excellent size, length and athleticism allow him to get his team plenty of extra possessions in the form of steals and blocks. He's also an intense competitor who's always willing to stick his nose in to get the job done, which definitely helps.




On the other hand, it's tough to ignore the fact that opposing coaches in Europe clearly game-plan against him, trying to create situations where they can isolate their best wing player against him with space to operate. In these situations, Vesely tends to struggle. He has difficulty getting in a low stance at his size and just doesn't have the lateral quickness to stay in front of the extremely quick and aggressive shot-creators he often finds at the small forward position.

To his credit, Vesely acknowledges that this is an issue for him. "Of course," he told us. "they are smaller than me, they are faster so I have to work on my aggressiveness, try to get faster and play better defense."



From DraftExpress.com http://www.draftexpress.com/profile/Jan ... z1Moob7pfj
http://www.draftexpress.com
User avatar
Dark Faze
Head Coach
Posts: 6,490
And1: 2,141
Joined: Dec 27, 2008

Re: 2011 DRAFT blather goes here. Part 3... 

Post#395 » by Dark Faze » Thu May 19, 2011 5:07 pm

Vesleys best case scenario is AK47 (which looks accurate) and worst case scenario is Joe Alexander.

Sure as heck isn't worth the risk imo, especially if he doesn't even play in the US next year.

We've got a great chance of trading with Utah. We should try to move up to get Kanter at a minimum, preferably Williams.
REDardWIZskin
Senior
Posts: 716
And1: 2
Joined: Jul 21, 2009
Location: DC

Re: 2011 DRAFT blather goes here. Part 3... 

Post#396 » by REDardWIZskin » Thu May 19, 2011 5:15 pm

I will vomit on Draft night if we pick Vesely. Hopefully Utah picks him
Sit back and watch WALL WORK!! >:-)
User avatar
gesa2
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,275
And1: 405
Joined: Jun 21, 2007
Location: Warwick MD
       

Re: 2011 DRAFT blather goes here. Part 3... 

Post#397 » by gesa2 » Thu May 19, 2011 5:17 pm

If Utah wants him, hopefully they trade down with us
Making extreme statements like "only" sounds like there are "no" Jokics in this draft? Jokic is an engine that was drafted in the 2nd round. Always a chance to see diamond dropped by sloppy burgular after a theft.
-WizD
closg00
RealGM
Posts: 24,700
And1: 4,557
Joined: Nov 21, 2004

Re: 2011 DRAFT blather goes here. Part 3... 

Post#398 » by closg00 » Thu May 19, 2011 5:50 pm

Editing FAIL at CBS Sports mock.

8. Detroit Pistons
Donatas Motiejunas, C, Benetton Treviso (Italy): Luke Babbitt and Paul George are on the rise, and any team would have to consider Ed Davis and Greg Monroe eight picks in. But it says here the Clippers have liked Hayward from Day 1, and he hasn't done anything to change that.

http://www.cbssports.com/nba/draft/full ... eDelGrande
dlts20
RealGM
Posts: 12,454
And1: 6,195
Joined: Dec 14, 2006

Re: 2011 DRAFT blather goes here. Part 3... 

Post#399 » by dlts20 » Thu May 19, 2011 6:08 pm

anyone watching the Draft Combine right now on NBA TV?
User avatar
GhostsOfGil
General Manager
Posts: 8,506
And1: 899
Joined: Jul 06, 2006

Re: 2011 DRAFT blather goes here. Part 3... 

Post#400 » by GhostsOfGil » Thu May 19, 2011 6:17 pm

just my take but im not really excited about any potential prospects at 6. i honestly think jeffers is more important to this team than bb, all euros sans kanter, or KL.

Return to Washington Wizards