ImageImageImageImageImage

Grunfeld Turned-Down $4.5 Mil Extension Offer

Moderators: nate33, montestewart, LyricalRico

Dat2U
RealGM
Posts: 24,226
And1: 8,057
Joined: Jun 23, 2001
Location: Columbus, OH
       

Re: Grunfeld Turned-Down $4.5 Mil Extension Offer 

Post#41 » by Dat2U » Fri Mar 23, 2012 6:47 pm

fishercob wrote:Vescey's report has been refuted bu the organization, Mike Lee, and Mike Wise.

You may recall that several months ago Vescey reported that Ted stripped Wed Unseld of his season tickets -- which Ted and Wes both denied vehemently.



Of course it may not be true, but having the report refuted by the organization and organizational mouthpieces don't mean a great deal.
Bickerstaff
Senior
Posts: 556
And1: 3
Joined: Jun 16, 2004

Re: Grunfeld Turned-Down $4.5 Mil Extension Offer 

Post#42 » by Bickerstaff » Fri Mar 23, 2012 7:01 pm

Dat2U wrote:
fishercob wrote:Vescey's report has been refuted bu the organization, Mike Lee, and Mike Wise.

You may recall that several months ago Vescey reported that Ted stripped Wed Unseld of his season tickets -- which Ted and Wes both denied vehemently.



Of course it may not be true, but having the report refuted by the organization and organizational mouthpieces don't mean a great deal.


Maybe, but having the report come from Peter Vescey doesn't exactly bring legitimacy in the 1st place.
User avatar
keynote
General Manager
Posts: 9,422
And1: 2,624
Joined: May 20, 2002
Location: Acceptance
         

Re: Grunfeld Turned-Down $4.5 Mil Extension Offer 

Post#43 » by keynote » Fri Mar 23, 2012 7:29 pm

One source of anecdotal evidence re: Vescey's pro-Donnie Walsh bias - Bill Simmons' Big Book of Basketball:
Google link here
Walsh's close friends include Peter Vecsey and Dan Klores (the latter a documentary filmmaker and formerly powerful PR guy in New York). There's a reason you've never read a negative Donnie Walsh piece."
Always remember, my friend: the world will change again. And you may have to come back through everywhere you've been.
truwizfan4evr
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,924
And1: 642
Joined: Jul 07, 2008
Location: tanking
 

Re: Grunfeld Turned-Down $4.5 Mil Extension Offer 

Post#44 » by truwizfan4evr » Fri Mar 23, 2012 7:33 pm

When is Ernie contract up?
You Shouldn't Play For Money, But You Should Play Because You Have A Passion For It -- Bradley Beal
User avatar
FAH1223
RealGM
Posts: 16,375
And1: 7,476
Joined: Nov 01, 2005
Location: Laurel, MD
       

Re: Grunfeld Turned-Down $4.5 Mil Extension Offer 

Post#45 » by FAH1223 » Fri Mar 23, 2012 7:57 pm

truwizfan4evr wrote:When is Ernie contract up?


after the season... or after the draft... not sure which
Image
truwizfan4evr
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,924
And1: 642
Joined: Jul 07, 2008
Location: tanking
 

Re: Grunfeld Turned-Down $4.5 Mil Extension Offer 

Post#46 » by truwizfan4evr » Fri Mar 23, 2012 8:38 pm

FAH1223 wrote:
truwizfan4evr wrote:When is Ernie contract up?


after the season... or after the draft... not sure which
thank goodness!
You Shouldn't Play For Money, But You Should Play Because You Have A Passion For It -- Bradley Beal
cl_1_2008
Ballboy
Posts: 44
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 19, 2009

Re: Grunfeld Turned-Down $4.5 Mil Extension Offer 

Post#47 » by cl_1_2008 » Fri Mar 23, 2012 8:46 pm

If I were Leonsis, I'd take a long, hard look at Kevin Pritchard. He was an excellent GM in Portland, and had to work for a guy who, by all accounts I've heard, is an extreme prick. He's already proven he can rebuild a team. They just had the injury bug bite them. I'm sure he'd leave Indiana for a head GM job, especially for a team with a good young foundation and cap flexibility.
truwizfan4evr
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,924
And1: 642
Joined: Jul 07, 2008
Location: tanking
 

Re: Grunfeld Turned-Down $4.5 Mil Extension Offer 

Post#48 » by truwizfan4evr » Fri Mar 23, 2012 8:55 pm

What i'm concern about is Ernie May walk but may still end up picking are draft picks.
You Shouldn't Play For Money, But You Should Play Because You Have A Passion For It -- Bradley Beal
User avatar
long suffrin' boulez fan
General Manager
Posts: 7,898
And1: 3,675
Joined: Nov 18, 2005
Location: Just above Ted's double bottom line
       

Re: Grunfeld Turned-Down $4.5 Mil Extension Offer 

Post#49 » by long suffrin' boulez fan » Fri Mar 23, 2012 9:01 pm

Open question:

would you sit in a teaming pile of your OWN feces for 4.5 million
In Rizzo we trust
queridiculo
RealGM
Posts: 17,944
And1: 9,328
Joined: Mar 29, 2005
Location: So long Wizturdz.
   

Re: Grunfeld Turned-Down $4.5 Mil Extension Offer 

Post#50 » by queridiculo » Fri Mar 23, 2012 9:07 pm

long suffrin' boulez fan wrote:Open question:

would you sit in a teaming pile of your OWN feces for 4.5 million


For how long?
The Consiglieri
Veteran
Posts: 2,902
And1: 1,071
Joined: May 09, 2007

Re: Grunfeld Turned-Down $4.5 Mil Extension Offer 

Post#51 » by The Consiglieri » Fri Mar 23, 2012 10:55 pm

Higga wrote:Yeah I definitely want someone young, hungry, and smart(at both GM and Coach). I'm sick of these has been retread losers. Seems like that's all Washington sports teams are able to hire and people wonder why we're stuck in a never ending cycle of mediocrity.


The Nats are the only DC team with a great FO. Even the Redskins merely moved to competent. Shanny's track record is mediocre in the draft (below average at the top end, good in the mid rounds), Allen's is much worse (though he was hired for financial and organizational issues not for the draft). I cant believe EG hasn't been canned, and I was a borderline backer until the '09 trade (after that, only backed his drafts, then cooled on that too after this past year).
User avatar
CaPtaiN eYeSaNo
Senior
Posts: 700
And1: 1
Joined: Jul 19, 2005
Location: The poster formerly known as Gil_Kills
     

Re: Grunfeld Turned-Down $4.5 Mil Extension Offer 

Post#52 » by CaPtaiN eYeSaNo » Fri Mar 23, 2012 11:03 pm

long suffrin' boulez fan wrote:Open question:

would you sit in a teaming pile of your OWN feces for 4.5 million



I don't have any millions.....so probably
User avatar
Ed Wood
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,763
And1: 330
Joined: Feb 11, 2005
Location: I appreciate Kevin Seraphin's affinity for hacks
Contact:
   

Re: Grunfeld Turned-Down $4.5 Mil Extension Offer 

Post#53 » by Ed Wood » Sat Mar 24, 2012 12:16 am

The Consiglieri wrote:
The Nats are the only DC team with a great FO. Even the Redskins merely moved to competent. Shanny's track record is mediocre in the draft (below average at the top end, good in the mid rounds), Allen's is much worse (though he was hired for financial and organizational issues not for the draft). I cant believe EG hasn't been canned, and I was a borderline backer until the '09 trade (after that, only backed his drafts, then cooled on that too after this past year).


The Nats don't actually have an exceptional front office, though I would rate it as competent. The combination of solid drafting and a willingness to spend a great deal in the draft process (which prior to revisions to the structure of the draft vastly increased the likelihood that a team would draft well) coupled with a number of very high picks at fortunate times has led to a solid overall product. When you consider the team's trade history and free agent signings (which are a little less dependent on luck and circumstance) the team is less impressive, though not bad.

And I can only hope this was (if true) entirely a ceremonial gesture which had been at least tacitly choreographed to allow Grunfeld to leave the team "by choice" and that Ted's nascent fondness for analytics is evident in a revamped cabinet next year.
User avatar
long suffrin' boulez fan
General Manager
Posts: 7,898
And1: 3,675
Joined: Nov 18, 2005
Location: Just above Ted's double bottom line
       

Re: Grunfeld Turned-Down $4.5 Mil Extension Offer 

Post#54 » by long suffrin' boulez fan » Sat Mar 24, 2012 12:17 am

hermitkid wrote:
long suffrin' boulez fan wrote:Open question:

would you sit in a teaming pile of your OWN feces for 4.5 million


For how long?


looks like the offer was for four years
In Rizzo we trust
User avatar
Ed Wood
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,763
And1: 330
Joined: Feb 11, 2005
Location: I appreciate Kevin Seraphin's affinity for hacks
Contact:
   

Re: Grunfeld Turned-Down $4.5 Mil Extension Offer 

Post#55 » by Ed Wood » Sat Mar 24, 2012 12:20 am

I'm not sure anything excreted by Ernie should be described as in any way associated with "team".
fishercob
RealGM
Posts: 13,922
And1: 1,571
Joined: Apr 25, 2002
Location: Tenleytown, DC

Re: Grunfeld Turned-Down $4.5 Mil Extension Offer 

Post#56 » by fishercob » Sat Mar 24, 2012 12:33 am

For the record, I'd sit in all your feces for $4.5M
"Some people have a way with words....some people....not have way."
— Steve Martin
go'stags
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,601
And1: 29
Joined: Aug 01, 2004

Re: Grunfeld Turned-Down $4.5 Mil Extension Offer 

Post#57 » by go'stags » Sat Mar 24, 2012 1:12 am

Ed Wood wrote:
The Consiglieri wrote:
The Nats are the only DC team with a great FO. Even the Redskins merely moved to competent. Shanny's track record is mediocre in the draft (below average at the top end, good in the mid rounds), Allen's is much worse (though he was hired for financial and organizational issues not for the draft). I cant believe EG hasn't been canned, and I was a borderline backer until the '09 trade (after that, only backed his drafts, then cooled on that too after this past year).


The Nats don't actually have an exceptional front office, though I would rate it as competent. The combination of solid drafting and a willingness to spend a great deal in the draft process (which prior to revisions to the structure of the draft vastly increased the likelihood that a team would draft well) coupled with a number of very high picks at fortunate times has led to a solid overall product. When you consider the team's trade history and free agent signings (which are a little less dependent on luck and circumstance) the team is less impressive, though not bad.



And I can only hope this was (if true) entirely a ceremonial gesture which had been at least tacitly choreographed to allow Grunfeld to leave the team "by choice" and that Ted's nascent fondness for analytics is evident in a revamped cabinet next year.


Maybe not the right place for this, but Rizzo is definitely an exceptional GM. He traded Ryan Langerhans for Michael Morse, who the stat guys hated. There's no way he expected this, but he took a flier on a guy who he liked and projected to get better. Matt Capps for Wilson Ramos is another great trade. He traded Hanarahan for Nyjer Morgan and Sean Burnett. Not even counting whatever it was that Nyjer gave us, Burnett was better the first year, Hanrahan better in the second. Burnett should bounce back this year. What trades by Rizzo am I forgetting? Most of the questionable ones were by Bowden.

FA is not as clear, obviously with the Werth signing, but I thought it was a good move at the time and still don't mind it. For one, no one saw his atrocious year coming, but secondly, ask any Orioles fan (like me) if they need/want to overpay for a top tier free agent. There is something to be said for a teams reputation among FAs and the rest of the league (look at the Wizards), especially with no salary cap to restrict spending. That was needed to change their image, and it was neccesary to overspend like they did. Adam Laroche was a fair signing for 2 years/15 million, he just got hurt. It happens. Matt Capps was signed to a one year deal then promptly traded for our catcher of the next 10 years, a future all-star. We will see how Edwin Jackson fairs, but at worst it is a one year failure. At best hes a great mercenary for a team hoping to make the playoffs.

No doubt they had great luck in getting Harper and Strasburg, but keep in mind that when many of their young studs (Espinosa, J. Zimmermann, Storen, Lombardozzi) were drafted, Rizzo wasn't GM but in charge of the draft, a claim he can still make. Most GMs do not head the draft.
LyricalRico wrote:
Speaking of giant penises, what's up with Bobby Simmons?.
User avatar
The Fax
Senior
Posts: 587
And1: 33
Joined: Sep 04, 2010
         

Re: Grunfeld Turned-Down $4.5 Mil Extension Offer 

Post#58 » by The Fax » Sat Mar 24, 2012 1:13 am

God it feels so sweet to finally have some real hope for this team. For the past decade or so we've either completely sucked(early 00's), had false hope (jordan era, 04-05), settled for being competitive (05-08) and then completely sucked again (08-present). With EG gone, we can truly turn the page and move on to a new era with a realistic goal of winning a championship in the next decade.
User avatar
Ed Wood
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,763
And1: 330
Joined: Feb 11, 2005
Location: I appreciate Kevin Seraphin's affinity for hacks
Contact:
   

Re: Grunfeld Turned-Down $4.5 Mil Extension Offer 

Post#59 » by Ed Wood » Sat Mar 24, 2012 1:49 am

go'stags wrote:
Maybe not the right place for this, but Rizzo is definitely an exceptional GM. He traded Ryan Langerhans for Michael Morse, who the stat guys hated. There's no way he expected this, but he took a flier on a guy who he liked and projected to get better. Matt Capps for Wilson Ramos is another great trade. He traded Hanarahan for Nyjer Morgan and Sean Burnett. Not even counting whatever it was that Nyjer gave us, Burnett was better the first year, Hanrahan better in the second. Burnett should bounce back this year. What trades by Rizzo am I forgetting? Most of the questionable ones were by Bowden.

FA is not as clear, obviously with the Werth signing, but I thought it was a good move at the time and still don't mind it. For one, no one saw his atrocious year coming, but secondly, ask any Orioles fan (like me) if they need/want to overpay for a top tier free agent. There is something to be said for a teams reputation among FAs and the rest of the league (look at the Wizards), especially with no salary cap to restrict spending. That was needed to change their image, and it was neccesary to overspend like they did. Adam Laroche was a fair signing for 2 years/15 million, he just got hurt. It happens. Matt Capps was signed to a one year deal then promptly traded for our catcher of the next 10 years, a future all-star. We will see how Edwin Jackson fairs, but at worst it is a one year failure. At best hes a great mercenary for a team hoping to make the playoffs.

No doubt they had great luck in getting Harper and Strasburg, but keep in mind that when many of their young studs (Espinosa, J. Zimmermann, Storen, Lombardozzi) were drafted, Rizzo wasn't GM but in charge of the draft, a claim he can still make. Most GMs do not head the draft.


Well this is certainly not the place but I'll throw out a rationale for the comment and then bow out. Rizzo is a perfectly competent general manager and compared to the general awfulness of Jim Bowden he looks positively saintly but I'd say that in trades and free agency he's been roughly neutral, and solid drafting (again with the advantage of being willing to devote considerable resources to pay for that talent) is the largest point in his favor. Beyond that the Capps for Ramos swap was excellent but honestly I think that's at least as much of a point against former Twins GM Bill Smith, who was awful. Beyond that and the very good, but as you concede very lucky Morse find I'm not thrilled with the qualities he seems to value in his acquisitions.

I'm not about to claim that the team's problem in center should have been easily solved but while Rick Ankiel was a stopgap he really isn't a starting caliber player and rumblings that Ian Desmond may have been too steep a price to pay for an upgrade would have to be considered poor judgement. I don't particularly mind the Hanrahan for Burnett/Morgan swap but at the time Morgan had value entirely tied up in an inflated batting average and the organization seemed to genuinely consider him a quality center fielder until forced concede otherwise.

I haven't cared for either of his trades with Oakland: Willingham was more valuable than the package they received for him (though not hugely valuable because of his contract and defense) and my early impression of the Gonzalez trade is that the Nationals over-payed considerably. So the net assessment is solid drafting but lukewarm free agent signings and trades. Not bad, but not great.
User avatar
long suffrin' boulez fan
General Manager
Posts: 7,898
And1: 3,675
Joined: Nov 18, 2005
Location: Just above Ted's double bottom line
       

Re: Grunfeld Turned-Down $4.5 Mil Extension Offer 

Post#60 » by long suffrin' boulez fan » Sat Mar 24, 2012 2:00 am

Another entry in the maybe not the right thread category, but I need to vent after watching that Caps debacle.

I really wonder about Leonsis as an owner. Listening to him talk and reading his blogs, it seems clear he is a sports fan, but really doesn't get sports at a high level.

The over reaction hack job he and gmgm have done on the Caps is truly sad. In two years, they have gone from the most elegant skating and stickhandling team in the league to a bunch of mismatched plodders.

One trade at a time-- one Fleishman for Hannan-- they've dismantled what should have been great for a decade.

Tonight? Seriously? One shot in period 3?
In Rizzo we trust

Return to Washington Wizards