Ruzious wrote:mhd wrote:If we resign Ariza, then what was the point of drafting Porter? It seems to me that the best type of SF to pair with Wall is a 3&D SF (exactly what Martell and Trevor are). I think EG just drafted BPA.
If Porter shows well, he may be trade bait in the future.
I think he drafted SPA - Safest player available. And Porter being local factored in. But with Webster showing he can play major minutes at the 2, perhaps Ariza helping at the 4, and the injury factor, there's just enough room for all 3 - while having the flexibility of being able to trade one of them.
I think Porter gets labeled as "safe" because he's really good -- and what makes him really good is that he's well rounded. Players who are really good at one are two things seem to have a ton of potential because you find yourself imagining "oh, if he can just add a jumper" or "oh man, once he figures out how to keep his motor up on D."
I think Porter does a myriad of things that help teams win games -- make shots, pass to teammates for easy shots, get rebounds, create turnovers, force misses, etc. He's not freakishly athletic by nba standards when it comes to explosiveness , quickness, and strength; he's soft spoken and not particularly demonstrative on the floor; and his name is Otto. So I think people can't help but presume an inherent "safety" and therefore lack of potential to his game. I think he's going robe a really, really good pro once he adjusts to the NBA game.
Sent from my iPad using RealGM Forums