ImageImageImageImageImage

Official Trade Thread Part XLVII

Moderators: LyricalRico, nate33, montestewart

User avatar
gesa2
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,269
And1: 403
Joined: Jun 21, 2007
Location: Warwick MD
       

Re: Official Trade Thread Part XLVII 

Post#761 » by gesa2 » Sat Jun 14, 2025 2:46 am

closg00 wrote:
80sballboy wrote:
Read on Twitter


I hope it turns into a + for the team rather than a clean-up.

We’re not using cap room this year, no reason to clean anything up. We might not get much of anything for him but I can’t imagine we’d be willing to sweeten a deal to get him off the roster.
Making extreme statements like "only" sounds like there are "no" Jokics in this draft? Jokic is an engine that was drafted in the 2nd round. Always a chance to see diamond dropped by sloppy burgular after a theft.
-WizD
payitforward
RealGM
Posts: 24,718
And1: 9,157
Joined: May 02, 2012
Location: On the Atlantic

Re: Official Trade Thread Part XLVII 

Post#762 » by payitforward » Sat Jun 14, 2025 1:20 pm

DCZards wrote:
Kanyewest wrote:
pcbothwel wrote:
Thank you. Whitmore, Mathurin, Jalen Green, Miles Bridges, etc.... STAY AWAY. Their physical tools and youth have tricked people into thinking they are actually good players. They arent. Slashing wings with inconsistent shooting, poor defense, low IQ, poor feel/vision, etc.


Every once in a while one of these guys figures it out.

I loved Mathurin coming out of Ariz. Thought he’d be a star. He really hasn’t lived up to my expectations. But what I liked most about Ben at Ariz. was his mental and physical toughness, and how he stepped up when the lights were the brightest. We’re seeing those things now during the NBA finals.

Agreed. I questioned him, but he's established himself at a high level with his play in this series.
9 and 20
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,689
And1: 1,251
Joined: Mar 28, 2021
 

Re: Official Trade Thread Part XLVII 

Post#763 » by 9 and 20 » Sun Jun 15, 2025 2:35 am

Read on Twitter


Very high hopes on a Durant trade involving us. Definitely could see us working our way into a Spurs or Rockets trade. Not sure how it might work with the Heat. Maybe on the margins with Kispert.

We need to leverage those pick swaps with Phoenix somehow. Time for Dawkins and Winger to earn their money.
Can't say I do. Who else gonna shoot?
User avatar
gambitx777
RealGM
Posts: 10,552
And1: 1,989
Joined: Dec 18, 2012

Re: Official Trade Thread Part XLVII 

Post#764 » by gambitx777 » Sun Jun 15, 2025 3:55 am

9 and 20 wrote:
Read on Twitter


Very high hopes on a Durant trade involving us. Definitely could see us working our way into a Spurs or Rockets trade. Not sure how it might work with the Heat. Maybe on the margins with Kispert.

We need to leverage those pick swaps with Phoenix somehow. Time for Dawkins and Winger to earn their money.
I wouldn't mind turning the swaps into something but I don't see a place for us in a KD trade with the spurs

Sent from my SM-S926U1 using RealGM mobile app
The Consiglieri
Veteran
Posts: 2,849
And1: 1,034
Joined: May 09, 2007

Re: Official Trade Thread Part XLVII 

Post#765 » by The Consiglieri » Sun Jun 15, 2025 5:10 am

I don't want to leverage those pick swaps for anything. The Suns are going to hit a brick wall HARD the next year or two, the pick swaps are not movable unless we get something absurdly valuable for them, like top 3 pick in a loaded draft valuable, which I cannot see happening. Keep the swaps.
User avatar
tsvqt
Veteran
Posts: 2,937
And1: 38
Joined: Jun 03, 2002
Location: Waldorf, Maryland
         

Re: Official Trade Thread Part XLVII 

Post#766 » by tsvqt » Sun Jun 15, 2025 3:57 pm

Greetings & Happy Father's Day to those applicable!
So, with the Desmond Bane trade to Orlando, I think this gives a good measuring stick for the cost of other moves.
What does a Poole haul land us, if we do move him?
Retired Air Force
closg00
RealGM
Posts: 24,561
And1: 4,503
Joined: Nov 21, 2004

Re: Official Trade Thread Part XLVII 

Post#767 » by closg00 » Sun Jun 15, 2025 4:02 pm

Insane Bane Trade
User avatar
keynote
General Manager
Posts: 9,422
And1: 2,624
Joined: May 20, 2002
Location: Acceptance
         

Re: Official Trade Thread Part XLVII 

Post#768 » by keynote » Sun Jun 15, 2025 4:20 pm

I would've happily traded Poole for two firsts and the same salary filler. Bane has a lot of $ left on his contract. Maybe Orlando valued the fact that Bane has a longer deal?
Always remember, my friend: the world will change again. And you may have to come back through everywhere you've been.
dckingsfan
RealGM
Posts: 34,889
And1: 20,436
Joined: May 28, 2010

Re: Official Trade Thread Part XLVII 

Post#769 » by dckingsfan » Sun Jun 15, 2025 4:33 pm

Teams that may want to trade up using multiple picks

OKC - 15 & 24; competition is Utah and Phoenix (Durant)
Brooklyn - don't see it - maybe 26 & 27 to move up into the teens
Magic - off the table
dckingsfan
RealGM
Posts: 34,889
And1: 20,436
Joined: May 28, 2010

Re: Official Trade Thread Part XLVII 

Post#770 » by dckingsfan » Sun Jun 15, 2025 4:41 pm

keynote wrote:I would've happily traded Poole for two firsts and the same salary filler. Bane has a lot of $ left on his contract. Maybe Orlando valued the fact that Bane has a longer deal?

Yeah, I think it was an overpay. But I also think that Bane is a MUCH better player than Poole and a better fit since he is a two-way player.

I think a combination of Suggs & Bane is a better play. But damn, that is a lot of picks.
WallToWall
Veteran
Posts: 2,822
And1: 1,030
Joined: May 20, 2010
         

Re: Official Trade Thread Part XLVII 

Post#771 » by WallToWall » Sun Jun 15, 2025 4:43 pm

If the Bane deal sets the bar, the there is not reason why Poole cant return 2 FRPs in trade.
IMO, they overpaid for Bane, but I'm happy to see the bar set there.
NatP4
RealGM
Posts: 14,779
And1: 6,010
Joined: Jul 24, 2016
         

Re: Official Trade Thread Part XLVII 

Post#772 » by NatP4 » Sun Jun 15, 2025 4:47 pm

WallToWall wrote:If the Bane deal sets the bar, the there is not reason why Poole cant return 2 FRPs in trade.
IMO, they overpaid for Bane, but I'm happy to see the bar set there.


Bane is a top 50 player in the league, in his prime, signed for the next 5 years.
PaulinVA
Junior
Posts: 292
And1: 245
Joined: Feb 14, 2021
       

Re: Official Trade Thread Part XLVII 

Post#773 » by PaulinVA » Sun Jun 15, 2025 4:52 pm

closg00 wrote:Insane Bane Trade


Insane in the Mem(phis) Bane?
User avatar
keynote
General Manager
Posts: 9,422
And1: 2,624
Joined: May 20, 2002
Location: Acceptance
         

Re: Official Trade Thread Part XLVII 

Post#774 » by keynote » Sun Jun 15, 2025 5:00 pm

dckingsfan wrote:
keynote wrote:I would've happily traded Poole for two firsts and the same salary filler. Bane has a lot of $ left on his contract. Maybe Orlando valued the fact that Bane has a longer deal?

Yeah, I think it was an overpay. But I also think that Bane is a MUCH better player than Poole and a better fit since he is a two-way player.

I think a combination of Suggs & Bane is a better play. But damn, that is a lot of picks.


Bane puts forth more consistent effort on D, but it's not like he's an elite stopper.

I think Poole is a better fit for Orlando: he's a better distributor than Bane, and they're better equipped to compensate for his defensive deficiencies than for Bane's lack of PG skills.

Poole is also cheaper and on a shorter deal.
Always remember, my friend: the world will change again. And you may have to come back through everywhere you've been.
NatP4
RealGM
Posts: 14,779
And1: 6,010
Joined: Jul 24, 2016
         

Re: Official Trade Thread Part XLVII 

Post#775 » by NatP4 » Sun Jun 15, 2025 5:22 pm

That is a crazy take. Poole has 2.5 seasons of being a slightly above average player. Most of his career, he’s been a net negative player.

We’ll be lucky to get a single 1st round pick back in a trade for Poole. I could see the argument of four 1sts for Bane vs one for Poole.
dckingsfan
RealGM
Posts: 34,889
And1: 20,436
Joined: May 28, 2010

Re: Official Trade Thread Part XLVII 

Post#776 » by dckingsfan » Sun Jun 15, 2025 5:32 pm

keynote wrote:
dckingsfan wrote:
keynote wrote:I would've happily traded Poole for two firsts and the same salary filler. Bane has a lot of $ left on his contract. Maybe Orlando valued the fact that Bane has a longer deal?

Yeah, I think it was an overpay. But I also think that Bane is a MUCH better player than Poole and a better fit since he is a two-way player.

I think a combination of Suggs & Bane is a better play. But damn, that is a lot of picks.

Bane puts forth more consistent effort on D, but it's not like he's an elite stopper.

I think Poole is a better fit for Orlando: he's a better distributor than Bane, and they're better equipped to compensate for his defensive deficiencies than for Bane's lack of PG skills.

Poole is also cheaper and on a shorter deal.

Your thinking vs. the Magic FO thinking. Bane is very much a plus defender and Poole - definitely not so much. Bane is also a better distributor, not by a lot but... and especially if you look over the past two years.

To recap, a better defender (by a lot), a better distributor (by a little) and a slightly better scorer with a much lower usage rate. He fits really well, IMO.

The only thing - it is very much an overpay (IMO).
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 70,271
And1: 22,703
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: Official Trade Thread Part XLVII 

Post#777 » by nate33 » Sun Jun 15, 2025 5:40 pm

I think acquiring Poole at a cost of just one FRP would have been better for Orlando than acquiring Bane at a cost of 4 FRP's. Bane is a much better defender, but that is somewhat offset by Poole's superior ball-handling and ability to run primary PnR actions. Also, Bane's price tag is pretty darn steep. He is making $40M a year over the next 4 years, which is going to make it hard for Orlando to keep enough talent around their core.

Bane reminds me a bit of Beal in that he is a very good player, but not quite good enough to be paid a max salary. If Bane is your second-best guy, you are a first round exit. And if he is your third-best guy, you will probably have salary cap problems.
dckingsfan
RealGM
Posts: 34,889
And1: 20,436
Joined: May 28, 2010

Re: Official Trade Thread Part XLVII 

Post#778 » by dckingsfan » Sun Jun 15, 2025 6:28 pm

nate33 wrote:I think acquiring Poole at a cost of just one FRP would have been better for Orlando than acquiring Bane at a cost of 4 FRP's. Bane is a much better defender, but that is somewhat offset by Poole's superior ball-handling and ability to run primary PnR actions. Also, Bane's price tag is pretty darn steep. He is making $40M a year over the next 4 years, which is going to make it hard for Orlando to keep enough talent around their core.

Bane reminds me a bit of Beal in that he is a very good player, but not quite good enough to be paid a max salary. If Bane is your second-best guy, you are a first round exit. And if he is your third-best guy, you will probably have salary cap problems.

Bane will be the Magic's 3rd best player, will it be enough? :dontknow:
Agreed - Magic overpaid for Bane, I think it was a bad long-term trade

Poole << Bane (opinion)
Pool doesn't move Orlando forward, IMO
Magic trading for Poole wouldn't be a good move either, IMO

As far as Poole goes, the competition was Simons. I think that the Magic just didn't want to with one-way players (opinion with no fact). They have one of the best defenses in the league and wanted to build on that. They see Suggs/Bane as a good fit. Are they right? :dontknow:
User avatar
J-Ves
Analyst
Posts: 3,065
And1: 1,297
Joined: May 16, 2012
 

Re: Official Trade Thread Part XLVII 

Post#779 » by J-Ves » Sun Jun 15, 2025 6:33 pm

WallToWall wrote:If the Bane deal sets the bar, the there is not reason why Poole cant return 2 FRPs in trade.
IMO, they overpaid for Bane, but I'm happy to see the bar set there.

I doubt it sets any bar. Its a desperation move by the magic, a team seemingly going nowhere but has the hope/delusion of youth on their side. Poole is not getting more than a single first and a few seconds in a deal
User avatar
TGW
RealGM
Posts: 13,355
And1: 6,723
Joined: Oct 22, 2010

Re: Official Trade Thread Part XLVII 

Post#780 » by TGW » Sun Jun 15, 2025 7:03 pm

Poole is getting no firsts. You all are hilariously delusional. He’s barely neutral value.
Some random troll wrote:Not to sound negative, but this team is owned by an arrogant cheapskate, managed by a moron and coached by an idiot. Recipe for disaster.

Return to Washington Wizards