you might wanna check his profile
http://www.draftexpress.com/profile/Cartier-Martin-381/
what do you guys think of him?????

Moderators: montestewart, LyricalRico, nate33
carl25ph wrote:do you guys think cartier martin deserves a spot on a rebuilding team
you might wanna check his profile
http://www.draftexpress.com/profile/Cartier-Martin-381/
what do you guys think of him?????
pancakes3 wrote:lester hudson's my "scrap player" of choice, actually.
verbal8 wrote:pancakes3 wrote:lester hudson's my "scrap player" of choice, actually.
There is room for both.
If I had to guess I would say that Martin has the edge due to the crowded backcourt and need at SF. Although if Nick Young seems to be suited to play SF, that would free up a spot for Hudson and probably crowd out Martin.
nate33 wrote:We have a greater need for Martin than Hudson. Hudson would never play behind Wall, Arenas, HInrich and Young. At least two of those four players would have to get hurt for Hudson to even sniff playing time in a non-garbage time situation.
I can envision scenarios where Martin could play some SF even when everyone was healthy. He would be the best 3-point shooting SF on the team (except when Young plays SF). All it would take is for any one of Hinrich, Young, Arenas, Thornton or Howard to get hurt and Martin would probably sneak into the rotation as either a backup SG or a backup SF who can spread the floor.
nate33 wrote:We have a greater need for Martin than Hudson. Hudson would never play behind Wall, Arenas, HInrich and Young. At least two of those four players would have to get hurt for Hudson to even sniff playing time in a non-garbage time situation.
I can envision scenarios where Martin could play some SF even when everyone was healthy. He would be the best 3-point shooting SF on the team (except when Young plays SF). All it would take is for any one of Hinrich, Young, Arenas, Thornton or Howard to get hurt and Martin would probably sneak into the rotation as either a backup SG or a backup SF who can spread the floor.
fishercob wrote:nate33 wrote:We have a greater need for Martin than Hudson. Hudson would never play behind Wall, Arenas, HInrich and Young. At least two of those four players would have to get hurt for Hudson to even sniff playing time in a non-garbage time situation.
I can envision scenarios where Martin could play some SF even when everyone was healthy. He would be the best 3-point shooting SF on the team (except when Young plays SF). All it would take is for any one of Hinrich, Young, Arenas, Thornton or Howard to get hurt and Martin would probably sneak into the rotation as either a backup SG or a backup SF who can spread the floor.
Not so sure, nate. I think the interest in Hudson is somewhat born out of the fact that they want to relieve Gilbert of any PG duties so as to ease/maximize his transition to being a star two.
I also think that Young is not in the long term plan.
I could see them signing Hudson and him being the third PG.
nate33 wrote:fishercob wrote:nate33 wrote:We have a greater need for Martin than Hudson. Hudson would never play behind Wall, Arenas, HInrich and Young. At least two of those four players would have to get hurt for Hudson to even sniff playing time in a non-garbage time situation.
I can envision scenarios where Martin could play some SF even when everyone was healthy. He would be the best 3-point shooting SF on the team (except when Young plays SF). All it would take is for any one of Hinrich, Young, Arenas, Thornton or Howard to get hurt and Martin would probably sneak into the rotation as either a backup SG or a backup SF who can spread the floor.
Not so sure, nate. I think the interest in Hudson is somewhat born out of the fact that they want to relieve Gilbert of any PG duties so as to ease/maximize his transition to being a star two.
I also think that Young is not in the long term plan.
I could see them signing Hudson and him being the third PG.
Arenas isn't an idiot. He doesn't need any help easing his transition to SG. He'll be a full time SG at the start of the season, but if Hinrich or Wall gets hurt, Arenas will move over to handle some minutes at PG. The guy has been playing PG for 8 years; he can handle it. He can certainly handle it a lot better than Lester freaking Hudson.
When you are looking at a draft pick, talent outweighs need because you never know if the pick will pan out to be a star. If he is, you address the fit issue by adjusting the rest of your team to accomodate the star draft pick. When you are looking at a vet minimum free agent walk-on, there is literally no chance of him becoming a star. You will never shift the rest of your team around to accomodate the walk-on. Therefore, you sign the guy who is the best fit. Fit outweighs talent.
I don't have an objection to keeping both, but if we sign just one, I think it should be Martin.
Also, whether or not Young is in the long term plan is irrelevant. Hudson/Carter will surely be signed to one-year vet-minimum contracts. We aren't looking at the long term.
eitanr wrote:I actually think he deserves the starting sf slot at this point. I mean Thornton is half way out the door.
eitanr wrote:I actually think he deserves the starting sf slot at this point. I mean Thornton is half way out the door.
verbal8 wrote:eitanr wrote:I actually think he deserves the starting sf slot at this point. I mean Thornton is half way out the door.
I think it could be a good idea to start him against Atlanta. With Arenas out there is not much shooting. Thornton might be a good option when Arenas returns, but I think either Martin or Nick Young needs to be in the line-up and Martin is a lot better option.