Trade Rumor: Gordon for Humphries
Moderators: BigSlam, yosemiteben, fatlever, JDR720, Diop
Re: Trade Rumor: Gordon for Humphries
- Liver_Pooty
- RealGM
- Posts: 40,771
- And1: 16,751
- Joined: Dec 29, 2008
- Location: Asheville, NC
-
Re: Trade Rumor: Gordon for Humphries
If Gordon doesn't check into the game by midway into the 2nd quarter tonight its a done deal.
Balllin wrote:Zion Williamson is 6-5, with a 6-10 wingspan. I see him as a slightly better Kenneth Faried.
Re: Trade Rumor: Gordon for Humphries
- James Gatz
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,727
- And1: 693
- Joined: Mar 12, 2012
Re: Trade Rumor: Gordon for Humphries
we updated our facebook cover photo and gordon isn't in it
Spooky
Liver_Pooty wrote:If Gordon doesn't check into the game by midway into the 2nd quarter tonight its a done deal.
Only time will tell.
Re: Trade Rumor: Gordon for Humphries
- BigSlam
- Forum Mod - Hornets
- Posts: 51,164
- And1: 8,360
- Joined: Jul 01, 2005
Re: Trade Rumor: Gordon for Humphries
Liver_Pooty wrote:If Gordon doesn't check into the game by midway into the 2nd quarter tonight its a done deal.
As he starts the 2nd.....

B B M F 'ers
Re: Trade Rumor: Gordon for Humphries
- Liver_Pooty
- RealGM
- Posts: 40,771
- And1: 16,751
- Joined: Dec 29, 2008
- Location: Asheville, NC
-
Re: Trade Rumor: Gordon for Humphries
BigSlam wrote:Liver_Pooty wrote:If Gordon doesn't check into the game by midway into the 2nd quarter tonight its a done deal.
As he starts the 2nd.....
Lol. Figures.
Balllin wrote:Zion Williamson is 6-5, with a 6-10 wingspan. I see him as a slightly better Kenneth Faried.
Re: Trade Rumor: Gordon for Humphries
- Diop
- Forum Mod - Hornets
- Posts: 40,526
- And1: 20,854
- Joined: Jul 24, 2004
- Location: Diop Dead Ugly
-
Re: Trade Rumor: Gordon for Humphries
Fred Williamson wrote:agree with Marvel. sure he's an upgrade, but it seems like another typical bobcats trade. just another player who lacks skills but compensates with hustle and effort. meh
This is how I feel.
He will come here and look crap as we expect/hope he can do more than he is capable.
The next Haywood, tt, diop, over paid role player

Re: Trade Rumor: Gordon for Humphries
- James Gatz
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,727
- And1: 693
- Joined: Mar 12, 2012
Re: Trade Rumor: Gordon for Humphries
Sachmo wrote:Fred Williamson wrote:agree with Marvel. sure he's an upgrade, but it seems like another typical bobcats trade. just another player who lacks skills but compensates with hustle and effort. meh
This is how I feel.
He will come here and look crap as we expect/hope he can do more than he is capable.
The next Haywood, tt, diop, over paid role player
But he's an adequate big who will contribute much more than Ben Gordon.
Re: Trade Rumor: Gordon for Humphries
- Liver_Pooty
- RealGM
- Posts: 40,771
- And1: 16,751
- Joined: Dec 29, 2008
- Location: Asheville, NC
-
Re: Trade Rumor: Gordon for Humphries
Sachmo wrote:Fred Williamson wrote:agree with Marvel. sure he's an upgrade, but it seems like another typical bobcats trade. just another player who lacks skills but compensates with hustle and effort. meh
This is how I feel.
He will come here and look crap as we expect/hope he can do more than he is capable.
The next Haywood, tt, diop, over paid role player
We aren't invested in him long term if we don't want to be. He would give us rebounding that we desperately need, and if things did go horribly bad he expires after next season. Really not that big of a risk unlike Thomas, and Diop were.
Balllin wrote:Zion Williamson is 6-5, with a 6-10 wingspan. I see him as a slightly better Kenneth Faried.
Re: Trade Rumor: Gordon for Humphries
- Eoghan
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,315
- And1: 3,293
- Joined: May 20, 2009
-
Re: Trade Rumor: Gordon for Humphries
BigSlam wrote:Start Humphries next to Mully or Haywood or Tyrus or Warrick for that matter.
Just start Humphries and send Biz to the D for the rest of the year.
Terrible ideas. Send Haywood, Tyrus or Warrick to the D league instead.
Re: Trade Rumor: Gordon for Humphries
- Fred Williamson
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,849
- And1: 519
- Joined: Dec 27, 2008
- Location: Yurop
-
Re: Trade Rumor: Gordon for Humphries
BrotherDave wrote:BigSlam wrote:Start Humphries next to Mully or Haywood or Tyrus or Warrick for that matter.
Just start Humphries and send Biz to the D for the rest of the year.
Terrible ideas. Send Haywood, Tyrus or Warrick to the D league instead.
why not all three of them?
Re: Trade Rumor: Gordon for Humphries
- Eoghan
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,315
- And1: 3,293
- Joined: May 20, 2009
-
Re: Trade Rumor: Gordon for Humphries
^sounds good to me.
Looking at the Nets' board, most of them seem perfectly fine with getting rid of Brooks as well. I guess MarShon lost his swag big time.
Looking at the Nets' board, most of them seem perfectly fine with getting rid of Brooks as well. I guess MarShon lost his swag big time.
Re: Trade Rumor: Gordon for Humphries
- Liver_Pooty
- RealGM
- Posts: 40,771
- And1: 16,751
- Joined: Dec 29, 2008
- Location: Asheville, NC
-
Re: Trade Rumor: Gordon for Humphries
BrotherDave wrote:^sounds good to me.
Looking at the Nets' board, most of them seem perfectly fine with getting rid of Brooks as well. I guess MarShon lost his swag big time.
I think most of the Nets board wants to get a first rounder out of him since they don't have a first rounder for another 54 years (im just assuming, but that would sound about right). Brooks has potential on the offensive end, but he still only weighs 165 pounds (estimating), and plays terrible defense.
Definitely worth a gamble though.
Balllin wrote:Zion Williamson is 6-5, with a 6-10 wingspan. I see him as a slightly better Kenneth Faried.
Re: Trade Rumor: Gordon for Humphries
- Liver_Pooty
- RealGM
- Posts: 40,771
- And1: 16,751
- Joined: Dec 29, 2008
- Location: Asheville, NC
-
Re: Trade Rumor: Gordon for Humphries
BrotherDave wrote:^sounds good to me.
Looking at the Nets' board, most of them seem perfectly fine with getting rid of Brooks as well. I guess MarShon lost his swag big time.
I think most of the Nets board wants to get a first rounder out of him since they don't have a first rounder for another 54 years (im just assuming, but that would sound about right). Brooks has potential on the offensive end, but he still only weighs 165 pounds (estimating), and plays terrible defense.
Definitely worth a gamble though.
Balllin wrote:Zion Williamson is 6-5, with a 6-10 wingspan. I see him as a slightly better Kenneth Faried.
Re: Trade Rumor: Gordon for Humphries
- Liver_Pooty
- RealGM
- Posts: 40,771
- And1: 16,751
- Joined: Dec 29, 2008
- Location: Asheville, NC
-
Re: Trade Rumor: Gordon for Humphries
BrotherDave wrote:^sounds good to me.
Looking at the Nets' board, most of them seem perfectly fine with getting rid of Brooks as well. I guess MarShon lost his swag big time.
I think most of the Nets board wants to get a first rounder out of him since they don't have a first rounder for another 54 years (im just assuming, but that would sound about right). Brooks has potential on the offensive end, but he still only weighs 165 pounds (estimating), and plays terrible defense.
Definitely worth a gamble though.
Balllin wrote:Zion Williamson is 6-5, with a 6-10 wingspan. I see him as a slightly better Kenneth Faried.
Re: Trade Rumor: Gordon for Humphries
- JMAC3
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,244
- And1: 6,257
- Joined: May 22, 2010
-
Re: Trade Rumor: Gordon for Humphries
This trade seems to make a lot of sense for both teams. I would also be interested in bringing back MarShon if we could because he would help make up for the three point shooting we are losing in Gordon.
We would be picking up two quality guys that could have a future with our team. If we could somehow get MarShon back he would give us more flexibility, because we would have lost Gordon, Hendo is up for a new contract, and Taylor isnt ready to be a starter. I agree that dealing Gordon makes drafting a shooting guard more attractive especially if Marshon isnt part of deal.
Ideally..
We get both guys and add Noel or 2 guard in draft.
Kemba- Sessions
McLemore- Brooks
MKG- Taylor
Hump- Mully
Biz- Haywood
Let Diop, Reggie, Hendo, and Warrick walk away. Then sign Jefferson. That could be a dangerous team.
We would be picking up two quality guys that could have a future with our team. If we could somehow get MarShon back he would give us more flexibility, because we would have lost Gordon, Hendo is up for a new contract, and Taylor isnt ready to be a starter. I agree that dealing Gordon makes drafting a shooting guard more attractive especially if Marshon isnt part of deal.
Ideally..
We get both guys and add Noel or 2 guard in draft.
Kemba- Sessions
McLemore- Brooks
MKG- Taylor
Hump- Mully
Biz- Haywood
Let Diop, Reggie, Hendo, and Warrick walk away. Then sign Jefferson. That could be a dangerous team.
Re: Trade Rumor: Gordon for Humphries
- James Gatz
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,727
- And1: 693
- Joined: Mar 12, 2012
Re: Trade Rumor: Gordon for Humphries
David Aldridge: Ben Gordon-Kris Humphries deal has been discussed by Brooklyn/Charlotte, but is a back burner possibility for now. Twitter @daldridgetnt
Re: Trade Rumor: Gordon for Humphries
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 3,494
- And1: 130
- Joined: Aug 25, 2010
Re: Trade Rumor: Gordon for Humphries
A Humphries-Gordon straight up swap does not interest me. We are going to suck either way and quite frankly the thought of a Humphries-Biyombo front court is frightening. There would be football teams scoring more points than the Bobcats.
We need another asset to do this deal. If we could offload a bad contract that'd be appealing (e.g., Tyrus) but the Nets don't really have another contract that they'd realistically include to make the salaries work. The Nets have traded all their picks in the near future that they can. What is left is Marshon Brooks. Brooks hasn't been that grade this year. His RAPM is not great. But he'd be worth the gamble since Gordon clearly isn't the future of the franchise either.
We need another asset to do this deal. If we could offload a bad contract that'd be appealing (e.g., Tyrus) but the Nets don't really have another contract that they'd realistically include to make the salaries work. The Nets have traded all their picks in the near future that they can. What is left is Marshon Brooks. Brooks hasn't been that grade this year. His RAPM is not great. But he'd be worth the gamble since Gordon clearly isn't the future of the franchise either.
Re: Trade Rumor: Gordon for Humphries
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 3,494
- And1: 130
- Joined: Aug 25, 2010
Re: Trade Rumor: Gordon for Humphries
JMAC3 wrote:Let Diop, Reggie, Hendo, and Warrick walk away. Then sign Jefferson. That could be a dangerous team.
Al Jefferson? He'd want way more money than he is worth to sign with us. He's not a leader. His defense is wanting. And he's 28 and on the wrong side of his prime (and his prime wasn't that prime). No thanks.
Re: Trade Rumor: Gordon for Humphries
- Keith Van Horn
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,976
- And1: 1,217
- Joined: Feb 18, 2012
-
Re: Trade Rumor: Gordon for Humphries
Hey guys, Nets fan here.
I actually proposed this trade a while back to you guys and it seemed like a bunch of you agreed with it.
I think it works well for both teams. Honestly Hump isn't a back PnR player and has worked on his outside jumper a lot. He is totally rotting on the bench in our idiotic coach's rotation. He's definitely still a double-double machine if given the steady minutes, but don't really expect more than 8-14 points on any given night. He's a classy player and will give you his all and is not afraid to stand up for himself (see Hump v. Rondo fight from earlier this year).
The Nets sorely need a proven scorer off the bench to go with Blatche and I think Gordon can be that guy.
I actually proposed this trade a while back to you guys and it seemed like a bunch of you agreed with it.
I think it works well for both teams. Honestly Hump isn't a back PnR player and has worked on his outside jumper a lot. He is totally rotting on the bench in our idiotic coach's rotation. He's definitely still a double-double machine if given the steady minutes, but don't really expect more than 8-14 points on any given night. He's a classy player and will give you his all and is not afraid to stand up for himself (see Hump v. Rondo fight from earlier this year).
The Nets sorely need a proven scorer off the bench to go with Blatche and I think Gordon can be that guy.
Re: Trade Rumor: Gordon for Humphries
- Keith Van Horn
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,976
- And1: 1,217
- Joined: Feb 18, 2012
-
Re: Trade Rumor: Gordon for Humphries
Liver_Pooty wrote:BrotherDave wrote:^sounds good to me.
Looking at the Nets' board, most of them seem perfectly fine with getting rid of Brooks as well. I guess MarShon lost his swag big time.
I think most of the Nets board wants to get a first rounder out of him since they don't have a first rounder for another 54 years (im just assuming, but that would sound about right). Brooks has potential on the offensive end, but he still only weighs 165 pounds (estimating), and plays terrible defense.
Definitely worth a gamble though.
Actually the Nets have their first rounders from here on out (the one they traded to ATL in the JJ deal was a protected first rounder from Huoston in the Terrance Williams trade).
How about if they included Marshon and you guys put in Warrick too?
Re: Trade Rumor: Gordon for Humphries
- Diop
- Forum Mod - Hornets
- Posts: 40,526
- And1: 20,854
- Joined: Jul 24, 2004
- Location: Diop Dead Ugly
-