ImageImage

Offseason 2025 Thread

Moderators: BigSlam, yosemiteben, fatlever, JDR720, Diop

User avatar
SWedd523
RealGM
Posts: 13,511
And1: 6,465
Joined: Jul 07, 2009
   

Re: Offseason 2025 Thread 

Post#381 » by SWedd523 » Sun Jun 8, 2025 4:28 pm

yosemiteben wrote:
SWedd523 wrote:And they were extremely unwatchable for at least half of the year

So we should keep him or else the thing that would have happened with him (someone else starting half the games) will also happen without him?

Not tracking the logic there.

It seems fairly clear?

You cannot move Mark unless you get a legit replacement (not the Duke kid) because the team is unwatchable with Nurkic starting.
Image
User avatar
yosemiteben
Forum Mod - Hornets
Forum Mod - Hornets
Posts: 22,315
And1: 15,525
Joined: Mar 20, 2013
   

Re: Offseason 2025 Thread 

Post#382 » by yosemiteben » Sun Jun 8, 2025 5:03 pm

SWedd523 wrote:
yosemiteben wrote:
SWedd523 wrote:And they were extremely unwatchable for at least half of the year

So we should keep him or else the thing that would have happened with him (someone else starting half the games) will also happen without him?

Not tracking the logic there.

It seems fairly clear?

You cannot move Mark unless you get a legit replacement (not the Duke kid) because the team is unwatchable with Nurkic starting.

"Watchability" is obviously pretty subjective, but I didn't think we were unwatchable in the fall before he came back.

I enjoyed watching those games much more than the 9-35 that we were in games he played after he came back. Not that the losing was all on him, and the bigger issue was missing like half the roster, but it feels like revisionist history to say we were unwatchable when he didn't play.
User avatar
fatlever
Senior Mod - Hornets
Senior Mod - Hornets
Posts: 59,122
And1: 15,690
Joined: Jun 04, 2001
Location: Terrapin Station
     

Re: Offseason 2025 Thread 

Post#383 » by fatlever » Sun Jun 8, 2025 7:28 pm

nurk isnt gonna win you games, but i actually enjoy watching him play. he's pretty fun. he can pass, hes great screener, he's a hoss, rebounds in traffic. fun stuff.

i enjoy watching moose play more than anyone other than melo/miller so...

watching mark play isnt super high on my enjoyment meter. watching mark try to defend isnt fun. watching him shrink every 1st q isnt fun.

who gives us best chance to win in future? - hopefully mark.
Rays Pompadour
Senior
Posts: 648
And1: 488
Joined: Jul 08, 2018
     

Re: Offseason 2025 Thread 

Post#384 » by Rays Pompadour » Tue Jun 10, 2025 12:30 am

fatlever wrote:nurk isnt gonna win you games, but i actually enjoy watching him play. he's pretty fun. he can pass, hes great screener, he's a hoss, rebounds in traffic. fun stuff.

i enjoy watching moose play more than anyone other than melo/miller so...

watching mark play isnt super high on my enjoyment meter. watching mark try to defend isnt fun. watching him shrink every 1st q isnt fun.

who gives us best chance to win in future? - hopefully mark.


Me, too. His player profile is ideal for today's NBA because of his recovery speed, athleticism, decently good understanding of spacing (especially on the defensive end) and his desire to dominate in his area. His height, length, weight, athleticism and emerging BBIQ fit the modern center profile. We'd like to see him develop an offensive game that would make him a rotation player and not just a situational bench big.
User avatar
Diop
Forum Mod - Hornets
Forum Mod - Hornets
Posts: 40,529
And1: 20,854
Joined: Jul 24, 2004
Location: Diop Dead Ugly
 

Re: Offseason 2025 Thread 

Post#385 » by Diop » Tue Jun 10, 2025 2:46 am

Rays Pompadour wrote:
fatlever wrote:nurk isnt gonna win you games, but i actually enjoy watching him play. he's pretty fun. he can pass, hes great screener, he's a hoss, rebounds in traffic. fun stuff.

i enjoy watching moose play more than anyone other than melo/miller so...

watching mark play isnt super high on my enjoyment meter. watching mark try to defend isnt fun. watching him shrink every 1st q isnt fun.

who gives us best chance to win in future? - hopefully mark.


Me, too. His player profile is ideal for today's NBA because of his recovery speed, athleticism, decently good understanding of spacing (especially on the defensive end) and his desire to dominate in his area. His height, length, weight, athleticism and emerging BBIQ fit the modern center profile. We'd like to see him develop an offensive game that would make him a rotation player and not just a situational bench big.

if he develops a consistent 3 point shot, we're going to wish we locked him in for longer. As he will be worth %%
Image
User avatar
JMAC3
RealGM
Posts: 13,250
And1: 6,259
Joined: May 22, 2010
     

Re: Offseason 2025 Thread 

Post#386 » by JMAC3 » Tue Jun 10, 2025 3:37 am

I don't get the hype of Moussa developing a three, that is as baseless as any player development hope as I have seen in some time.

College 3/14 from three and 62% from FT
Gleague 1/9 from three and 56% from FT
NBA 1/8 from three and 60% from FT

16% is about as low as someone can possibly shoot along with absolutely no volume and terrible touch from Free Throw line. Moussa is 23 yrs old too, so it would be like picking a 5th yr college senior in this draft with these stats with the hopes of developing them into a stretch 5.

If Charlotte wants a stretch 5 they would be better off trying to develop almost any other big in this draft class over what Moussa has consistently shown shooting the ball.
User avatar
Diop
Forum Mod - Hornets
Forum Mod - Hornets
Posts: 40,529
And1: 20,854
Joined: Jul 24, 2004
Location: Diop Dead Ugly
 

Re: Offseason 2025 Thread 

Post#387 » by Diop » Tue Jun 10, 2025 4:01 am

JMAC3 wrote:I don't get the hype of Moussa developing a three, that is as baseless as any player development hope as I have seen in some time.

College 3/14 from three and 62% from FT
Gleague 1/9 from three and 56% from FT
NBA 1/8 from three and 60% from FT

16% is about as low as someone can possibly shoot along with absolutely no volume and terrible touch from Free Throw line. Moussa is 23 yrs old too, so it would be like picking a 5th yr college senior in this draft with these stats with the hopes of developing them into a stretch 5.

If Charlotte wants a stretch 5 they would be better off trying to develop almost any other big in this draft class over what Moussa has consistently shown shooting the ball.

i think everyone should be able to develop an outside shot if they practiced enough, thats my thinking. im probably wrong, but whatevs
i truly believed Shaq should have been more dominant than he was, but he never bothered to learn how to shoot properly.
Image
User avatar
Diop
Forum Mod - Hornets
Forum Mod - Hornets
Posts: 40,529
And1: 20,854
Joined: Jul 24, 2004
Location: Diop Dead Ugly
 

Re: Offseason 2025 Thread 

Post#388 » by Diop » Tue Jun 10, 2025 4:15 am

i think my new offseason plan is a good cycle of PED's for Lamelo and Mark.

get them in bursting with muscle to rage across the NBA.
Image
User avatar
HornetJail
RealGM
Posts: 46,562
And1: 14,278
Joined: Feb 05, 2012
     

Re: Offseason 2025 Thread 

Post#389 » by HornetJail » Tue Jun 10, 2025 4:18 am

Diop wrote:
JMAC3 wrote:I don't get the hype of Moussa developing a three, that is as baseless as any player development hope as I have seen in some time.

College 3/14 from three and 62% from FT
Gleague 1/9 from three and 56% from FT
NBA 1/8 from three and 60% from FT

16% is about as low as someone can possibly shoot along with absolutely no volume and terrible touch from Free Throw line. Moussa is 23 yrs old too, so it would be like picking a 5th yr college senior in this draft with these stats with the hopes of developing them into a stretch 5.

If Charlotte wants a stretch 5 they would be better off trying to develop almost any other big in this draft class over what Moussa has consistently shown shooting the ball.

i think everyone should be able to develop an outside shot if they practiced enough, thats my thinking. im probably wrong, but whatevs
i truly believed Shaq should have been more dominant than he was, but he never bothered to learn how to shoot properly.

i don't agree with it. some people just don't have the right hand eye coordination to become an actual nba-level shooter. There's no reason to believe either Moose or Mark is going to magically come out firing jumpers. (Moose far less so than Mark)
investigate Adam Silver
User avatar
JMAC3
RealGM
Posts: 13,250
And1: 6,259
Joined: May 22, 2010
     

Re: Offseason 2025 Thread 

Post#390 » by JMAC3 » Tue Jun 10, 2025 4:28 am

HornetJail wrote:
Diop wrote:
JMAC3 wrote:I don't get the hype of Moussa developing a three, that is as baseless as any player development hope as I have seen in some time.

College 3/14 from three and 62% from FT
Gleague 1/9 from three and 56% from FT
NBA 1/8 from three and 60% from FT

16% is about as low as someone can possibly shoot along with absolutely no volume and terrible touch from Free Throw line. Moussa is 23 yrs old too, so it would be like picking a 5th yr college senior in this draft with these stats with the hopes of developing them into a stretch 5.

If Charlotte wants a stretch 5 they would be better off trying to develop almost any other big in this draft class over what Moussa has consistently shown shooting the ball.

i think everyone should be able to develop an outside shot if they practiced enough, thats my thinking. im probably wrong, but whatevs
i truly believed Shaq should have been more dominant than he was, but he never bothered to learn how to shoot properly.

i don't agree with it. some people just don't have the right hand eye coordination to become an actual nba-level shooter. There's no reason to believe either Moose or Mark is going to magically come out firing jumpers. (Moose far less so than Mark)


There is just nothing about Moussa game that says he has any type of touch or finesse.
4%th percentile in FT shooting.
11%th percentile in Assist %
17%th percentile in Turnover %

At least with Mark he has shown touch in FT% and showed growth as a passer.
80% free throw, 58th%
62nd% in assist%
51st% in turnover%

As mentioned hard to find a center in this draft class that I think that projects as a worse outside shooter than Moussa, so yeah I don't think he is one off-season away from being able to play the 4. Honestly, he is a fun energy big, I get people like him but also think people are so desperate to oversell him as something he isn't.
User avatar
HornetJail
RealGM
Posts: 46,562
And1: 14,278
Joined: Feb 05, 2012
     

Re: Offseason 2025 Thread 

Post#391 » by HornetJail » Tue Jun 10, 2025 4:32 am

exactly, he should stick to what he does best, and hone in on being the best rebounder and most versatile defender he can be. And clean up his finishing ability and free throws before he even thinks about trying to extend his range. Offensively, he is about as close to Bismack as it gets. Although I've been encouraged that he looked like 2015 Biz offensively by the end of the season instead of rookie Bobcats Biz like he did early in the season.

i don't think Moose is ever going to be skilled enough to play more than 20mpg on a team trying to do anything, but he'll give you 10-15 valuable bench minutes eventually
investigate Adam Silver
User avatar
Diop
Forum Mod - Hornets
Forum Mod - Hornets
Posts: 40,529
And1: 20,854
Joined: Jul 24, 2004
Location: Diop Dead Ugly
 

Re: Offseason 2025 Thread 

Post#392 » by Diop » Tue Jun 10, 2025 4:35 am

JMAC3 wrote: people are so desperate

just finish there, we are so desperate for something positive.
Image
LofJ
RealGM
Posts: 12,923
And1: 11,125
Joined: Mar 29, 2014
   

Re: Offseason 2025 Thread 

Post#393 » by LofJ » Tue Jun 10, 2025 5:30 pm

As always with this organization, keep your expectations low.

Read on Twitter
hoopsfan777
Junior
Posts: 253
And1: 58
Joined: Jun 01, 2025
         

Re: Offseason 2025 Thread 

Post#394 » by hoopsfan777 » Tue Jun 10, 2025 11:35 pm

New Orleans outgoing

CJ McCollum

Charlotte outgoing

Bridges
#33
#34
User avatar
JMAC3
RealGM
Posts: 13,250
And1: 6,259
Joined: May 22, 2010
     

Re: Offseason 2025 Thread 

Post#395 » by JMAC3 » Tue Jun 10, 2025 11:54 pm

hoopsfan777 wrote:New Orleans outgoing

CJ McCollum

Charlotte outgoing

Bridges
#33
#34


Nah we will pass on this.
User avatar
yosemiteben
Forum Mod - Hornets
Forum Mod - Hornets
Posts: 22,315
And1: 15,525
Joined: Mar 20, 2013
   

Re: Offseason 2025 Thread 

Post#396 » by yosemiteben » Tue Jun 10, 2025 11:59 pm

JMAC3 wrote:
hoopsfan777 wrote:New Orleans outgoing

CJ McCollum

Charlotte outgoing

Bridges
#33
#34


Nah we will pass on this.

Yeah I'm not sure what the motivation would be. Miles was much better the second half of last season and his contract steps down over the next two years. McCollum turns 34 before next season and he's expiring, so he's clearly not a part of any long term plans, not trying to get older and lose picks in the process.
JustBuzzin
RealGM
Posts: 16,142
And1: 13,681
Joined: Jun 10, 2023
 

Re: Offseason 2025 Thread 

Post#397 » by JustBuzzin » Wed Jun 11, 2025 12:07 am

I wouldn't trade Miles straight up for CJ. If anyone is adding picks it would be New Orleans.
User avatar
MPM
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,323
And1: 3,853
Joined: Mar 21, 2009
Location: Mouse Town
     

Re: Offseason 2025 Thread 

Post#398 » by MPM » Wed Jun 11, 2025 12:19 am

I'll counter with Nurkic for Murphy straight up. :)
User avatar
Liver_Pooty
RealGM
Posts: 40,773
And1: 16,753
Joined: Dec 29, 2008
Location: Asheville, NC
   

Re: Offseason 2025 Thread 

Post#399 » by Liver_Pooty » Wed Jun 11, 2025 12:52 am

JMAC3 wrote:
hoopsfan777 wrote:New Orleans outgoing

CJ McCollum

Charlotte outgoing

Bridges
#33
#34


Nah we will pass on this.


lol that’s an understatement
Balllin wrote:Zion Williamson is 6-5, with a 6-10 wingspan. I see him as a slightly better Kenneth Faried.
User avatar
Diop
Forum Mod - Hornets
Forum Mod - Hornets
Posts: 40,529
And1: 20,854
Joined: Jul 24, 2004
Location: Diop Dead Ugly
 

Re: Offseason 2025 Thread 

Post#400 » by Diop » Wed Jun 11, 2025 1:34 am

LofJ wrote:As always with this organization, keep your expectations low.

Read on Twitter

unless they start selling draft picks, which seems very unlikely, we don't have a huge amount to trade with.
Image

Return to Charlotte Hornets