timeaftertime wrote:FNQ wrote:I think OPs comparison is a lot closer than a lot of you are acting
It's just the nature of the NBA and how star-driven everything is now, I think. You're always going to take someone who has a 25% chance of becoming Dwyane Wade over someone who has a 75% chance of becoming Mike Conley.
(By the way, I just used these numbers/players as an example. I have no interest arguing Edwards chances of becoming Dwyane Wade or if Conley is the right comparison for Maxey. Haha.)
Totally get you
I've always been of the mind that a great role player >>> an average #1 option, even though the #1 option is likely more talented. Give me the guy who can succeed in his role. Now if you are searching for a #1, and most teams are, I get that they'd prefer to take the odds of the higher ceiling guy. But the outright scoffing at Maxey, who's thriving, that he can't be a top option and Edwards can simply due to athleticism and pedigree.. I dont buy it at all
Lets say the numbers stay flat all season, Maxey is a 3rd banana with a 60+ TS, Edwards is a top 2 guy with a 51.5% TS.. I'd almost definitely rather have Maxey at that point, even if my team was rebuilding. He likely makes my team better, thus makes it more appealing place to be, than having a guy whos a poor #1. I dont wish the Monta Ellis experience on any entire fanbase, its the worst



















