Je K wrote:steger_3434 wrote:https://www.dailywire.com/news/stanford-professor-data-indicates-were-overreacting-to-coronavirus
Not saying this is right, but an expert in his field with a different view point. Long read, so most wont and say it’s garbage
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
His argument is that the mortality rate is actually much lower than the assumptions we're operating with right now. But even if that very low mortality rate is true, it's still overwhelming health care systems as we speak. So aren't the measures that are being taken around the world fair? He's calling these measures drastic, but it's been proven that it can overwhelm health care systems. I guess I don't see how he can conclude that we're doing too much - just look at what's going on.
Well for example, from the article:
"In the absence of data, prepare-for-the-worst reasoning leads to extreme measures of social distancing and lockdowns. Unfortunately, we do not know if these measures work. School closures, for example, may reduce transmission rates. But they may also backfire if children socialize anyhow, if school closure leads children to spend more time with susceptible elderly family members, if children at home disrupt their parents ability to work, and more. School closures may also diminish the chances of developing herd immunity in an age group that is spared serious disease."
So in that case he's arguing that what's being done may be incorrect and could backfire.
Your post focused just on the health care system, but that's not nearly all that's at play here.
He could be talking about the "experts" that predicted 1 million+ U.S. deaths, the media constantly emphasizing worst-case scenarios, and the subsequent mass hysteria that has people fighting over food, hoarding toilet paper, and acting like it's the apocalypse.