RaptorNews wrote:JesusHCoxMd wrote:37 FTA to 13 FTA, but Heat fans can never complain.
They can't?
This thread sure fooled me
Says the raptors fan.
Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285
RaptorNews wrote:JesusHCoxMd wrote:37 FTA to 13 FTA, but Heat fans can never complain.
They can't?
This thread sure fooled me
FinnTheHuman wrote:Gosh, it's like nobody even watched the game. You can't just show FT disparity and claim it's unfair officiating. It's false logic. Maybe a couple of arguable to bad calls, MAYBE 4 to 6 more points that the Heat would get. How does that win them the game?
GreenBloodedC wrote:
Heat loses, you know what's next
Bravely Done wrote:it'd be sadly boring seeing Miami swept against OKC.
DetriotPistons wrote:This whole"positionless basketball" idea is a joke. The Heat are lucky the east is so embarrassingly bad
SlowPaced wrote:FinnTheHuman wrote:Gosh, it's like nobody even watched the game. You can't just show FT disparity and claim it's unfair officiating. It's false logic. Maybe a couple of arguable to bad calls, MAYBE 4 to 6 more points that the Heat would get. How does that win them the game?
That false logic applies to every single Heat game where they have more FT attempts.
mswenson wrote:the 3 pt swing on watsons offensive foul made no comeback possible. not even a flagrant either. guy was trying to score for an and 1 still and he fouled the arm with the ball in it
bryanoid wrote:Another thing, Thunder/Pacers were a finals matchup possibilty in everyone's mind earlier in the year. There was even a thread with a poll asking who would likely win. Thunder led that poll by a huge margin, but Ibaka played a huge part in peoples' arguments. If these two teams meet in the Finals, would the Thunder still be favored? Not overreacting to one game, just wondering..
mswenson wrote:the 3 pt swing on watsons offensive foul made no comeback possible. not even a flagrant either. guy was trying to score for an and 1 still and he fouled the arm with the ball in it. Just because watson is 5 foot tall and lebron is 7 ft tall doesn't mean a tap is a flagrant foul
SlowPaced wrote:FinnTheHuman wrote:Gosh, it's like nobody even watched the game. You can't just show FT disparity and claim it's unfair officiating. It's false logic. Maybe a couple of arguable to bad calls, MAYBE 4 to 6 more points that the Heat would get. How does that win them the game?
That false logic applies to every single Heat game where they have more FT attempts.
Q00 wrote:Its not the 13 for Miami that is curious to me as much as the 37 by Indiana.
I agree that Miami took a lot of jumpshots, but so did Indiana. It didn't look to me like Indiana was attacking the basket any more than Miami. It just seemed like one team was allowed to play physical defense and the other got whistled every time they tried.
I'm not bias to either team. That was just my take watching this game.

Q00 wrote:Its not the 13 for Miami that is curious to me as much as the 37 by Indiana.
I agree that Miami took a lot of jumpshots, but so did Indiana. It didn't look to me like Indiana was attacking the basket any more than Miami. It just seemed like one team was allowed to play physical defense and the other got whistled every time they tried.
I'm not bias to either team. That was just my take watching this game.
