tsherkin wrote:There's always an element of risk and these sorts of things are the product of factors that cannot be controlled... And happen in totalitarian states anyway. We do what we can within the bounds of morality as it stands: the Patriot Act is already a gross insult to a liberal democratic society as it stands, no need to go further.
I was born in a somewhat totalitarian state (former GDR), and have the experience of my ancestors to live through this. Having the state violating the human rights is no better than having some "crazy" people shooting others. A nation needs to find a balance to have the best combination of personal liberty and security. Violating the liberty of others (including harming them psychologically and physiologically) should be a crime independent of whoever is the violator, whether it is an individual or a group or the state via their representatives from the legislature, executive or judiciary. Seems like a pretty simple concept, if it wouldn't be for the human desire to seek power over others ...


























