WC Playoffs: (3) Suns vs. (6) Blazers
Moderators: KingDavid, cupcakesnake, Domejandro, ken6199, infinite11285, Clav, Dirk, bwgood77, bisme37, zimpy27
Re: WC Playoffs: (3) Suns vs. (6) Blazers
- PacificBlazer
- Starter
- Posts: 2,129
- And1: 128
- Joined: Jul 06, 2008
- Location: Union, Oregon
-
Re: WC Playoffs: (3) Suns vs. (6) Blazers
-
Jimmy76
- RealGM
- Posts: 14,548
- And1: 9
- Joined: May 01, 2009
Re: WC Playoffs: (3) Suns vs. (6) Blazers
PacificBlazer wrote:Its the playoffs, time to man up Phoenix.
you guys go from "boo hoo poor us" to trash talking fools incredibly quick
Re: WC Playoffs: (3) Suns vs. (6) Blazers
-
EtchenBa
- Starter
- Posts: 2,156
- And1: 573
- Joined: Jun 28, 2008
-
Re: WC Playoffs: (3) Suns vs. (6) Blazers
Kerrsed wrote:EtchenBa wrote:Kerrsed wrote:thats what players do when they know its a flagrant, they try to help the person up ASAP!
He also went for the ball though...it's not like he just clotheslined him or flat out shoved him.
Amare also got a Flagrant for an elbow that didnt make contact! So what is your point?
Flagrant fouls are for malicious and/or wreckless attempts. Amare's was malicious, Bayless's was neither.
Re: WC Playoffs: (3) Suns vs. (6) Blazers
-
Jimmy76
- RealGM
- Posts: 14,548
- And1: 9
- Joined: May 01, 2009
Re: WC Playoffs: (3) Suns vs. (6) Blazers
jesus our shooting has been bad
Re: WC Playoffs: (3) Suns vs. (6) Blazers
-
Jimmy76
- RealGM
- Posts: 14,548
- And1: 9
- Joined: May 01, 2009
Re: WC Playoffs: (3) Suns vs. (6) Blazers
rest nash for 2 minutes
then i want him right back
then i want him right back
Re: WC Playoffs: (3) Suns vs. (6) Blazers
- PacificBlazer
- Starter
- Posts: 2,129
- And1: 128
- Joined: Jul 06, 2008
- Location: Union, Oregon
-
Re: WC Playoffs: (3) Suns vs. (6) Blazers
Jimmy76 wrote:PacificBlazer wrote:Its the playoffs, time to man up Phoenix.
you guys go from "boo hoo poor us" to trash talking fools incredibly quick
I'm talking about the Suns players flopping and complaining to the refs every other play. Don't take it personally man

Oh hi Realgm
Re: WC Playoffs: (3) Suns vs. (6) Blazers
- Kerrsed
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 29,876
- And1: 16,578
- Joined: Mar 31, 2009
- Location: Land of the Internet Memes
- Contact:
-
Re: WC Playoffs: (3) Suns vs. (6) Blazers
EtchenBa wrote:Flagrant fouls are for unnecessary and/or excessive contact.. Amare's was non contact, Bayless's was contact.
Fixed!
Read the NBA rules
http://www.nba.com/analysis/rules_12.html?nav=ArticleList
Its #DUMPSTERFIRE SEASON! #TeamTRAINWRECK -KERRSED- The Mod, The Myth, The Legend


Re: WC Playoffs: (3) Suns vs. (6) Blazers
-
Jimmy76
- RealGM
- Posts: 14,548
- And1: 9
- Joined: May 01, 2009
Re: WC Playoffs: (3) Suns vs. (6) Blazers
PacificBlazer wrote:Jimmy76 wrote:PacificBlazer wrote:Its the playoffs, time to man up Phoenix.
you guys go from "boo hoo poor us" to trash talking fools incredibly quick
I'm talking about the Suns players flopping and complaining to the refs every other play. Don't take it personally man
I didnt
was commenting on how quickly you guys change your stripes
aka "doom and gloom afternoon" gamethread where you guys predicted the suns would win by 50 to acting cocky
Re: WC Playoffs: (3) Suns vs. (6) Blazers
- Cro_Ruption
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,875
- And1: 93
- Joined: Jul 03, 2008
- Location: P-TOWN
Re: WC Playoffs: (3) Suns vs. (6) Blazers
good game from both sides so far.
SharoneWright wrote:I would not trade Bargs for Roy.
Monster or no.
i said it. And I live in a flame retardent suit.
Re: WC Playoffs: (3) Suns vs. (6) Blazers
-
Jimmy76
- RealGM
- Posts: 14,548
- And1: 9
- Joined: May 01, 2009
Re: WC Playoffs: (3) Suns vs. (6) Blazers
STOP BARBOSA ISOS
Re: WC Playoffs: (3) Suns vs. (6) Blazers
-
Jimmy76
- RealGM
- Posts: 14,548
- And1: 9
- Joined: May 01, 2009
Re: WC Playoffs: (3) Suns vs. (6) Blazers
unecessary duds
Re: WC Playoffs: (3) Suns vs. (6) Blazers
-
Greatness
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,638
- And1: 4,556
- Joined: Aug 23, 2009
- Location: Toronto
-
Re: WC Playoffs: (3) Suns vs. (6) Blazers
Amare is a beast.
Re: WC Playoffs: (3) Suns vs. (6) Blazers
-
Greatness
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,638
- And1: 4,556
- Joined: Aug 23, 2009
- Location: Toronto
-
Re: WC Playoffs: (3) Suns vs. (6) Blazers
Terrible call
Re: WC Playoffs: (3) Suns vs. (6) Blazers
-
studcrackers
- Forum Mod

- Posts: 52,226
- And1: 6,100
- Joined: Oct 31, 2004
- Location: Getting hit in the head
-
Re: WC Playoffs: (3) Suns vs. (6) Blazers
Superman5190 wrote:Terrible call
Jugs wrote: I saw two buttholes
Re: WC Playoffs: (3) Suns vs. (6) Blazers
-
Jimmy76
- RealGM
- Posts: 14,548
- And1: 9
- Joined: May 01, 2009
Re: WC Playoffs: (3) Suns vs. (6) Blazers
nashty time plox
our o is weak without him
our o is weak without him
Re: WC Playoffs: (3) Suns vs. (6) Blazers
-
Greatness
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,638
- And1: 4,556
- Joined: Aug 23, 2009
- Location: Toronto
-
Re: WC Playoffs: (3) Suns vs. (6) Blazers
How is that not a backcourt violation?
Re: WC Playoffs: (3) Suns vs. (6) Blazers
-
Jimmy76
- RealGM
- Posts: 14,548
- And1: 9
- Joined: May 01, 2009
Re: WC Playoffs: (3) Suns vs. (6) Blazers
4 team fouls already
****
GET NASH IN
****
GET NASH IN
Re: WC Playoffs: (3) Suns vs. (6) Blazers
-
studcrackers
- Forum Mod

- Posts: 52,226
- And1: 6,100
- Joined: Oct 31, 2004
- Location: Getting hit in the head
-
Re: WC Playoffs: (3) Suns vs. (6) Blazers
Superman5190 wrote:How is that not a backcourt violation?
i always thought that wasnt a backcourt violation since you dont have control of the ball
Jugs wrote: I saw two buttholes
Re: WC Playoffs: (3) Suns vs. (6) Blazers
-
EtchenBa
- Starter
- Posts: 2,156
- And1: 573
- Joined: Jun 28, 2008
-
Re: WC Playoffs: (3) Suns vs. (6) Blazers
Kerrsed wrote:EtchenBa wrote:Flagrant fouls are for unnecessary and/or excessive contact.. Amare's was non contact, Bayless's was contact.
Fixed!![]()
Read the NBA rules
http://www.nba.com/analysis/rules_12.html?nav=ArticleList
Ok, so then can we agree that NEITHER should be called a flagrant?
Re: WC Playoffs: (3) Suns vs. (6) Blazers
- Kerrsed
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 29,876
- And1: 16,578
- Joined: Mar 31, 2009
- Location: Land of the Internet Memes
- Contact:
-
Re: WC Playoffs: (3) Suns vs. (6) Blazers
studcrackers wrote:Superman5190 wrote:How is that not a backcourt violation?
i always thought that wasnt a backcourt violation since you dont have control of the ball
+1
Its #DUMPSTERFIRE SEASON! #TeamTRAINWRECK -KERRSED- The Mod, The Myth, The Legend



