WC Playoffs: (3) Suns vs. (6) Blazers

Moderators: KingDavid, cupcakesnake, Domejandro, ken6199, infinite11285, Clav, Dirk, bwgood77, bisme37, zimpy27

Who will win?

Suns in 4
21
8%
Suns in 5
63
25%
Suns in 6
77
31%
Suns in 7
13
5%
Blazers in 4
8
3%
Blazers in 5
3
1%
Blazers in 6
48
19%
Blazers in 7
16
6%
 
Total votes: 249

User avatar
PacificBlazer
Starter
Posts: 2,129
And1: 128
Joined: Jul 06, 2008
Location: Union, Oregon
     

Re: WC Playoffs: (3) Suns vs. (6) Blazers 

Post#1401 » by PacificBlazer » Sat Apr 24, 2010 10:35 pm

Its the playoffs, time to man up Phoenix.
Oh hi Realgm
Jimmy76
RealGM
Posts: 14,548
And1: 9
Joined: May 01, 2009

Re: WC Playoffs: (3) Suns vs. (6) Blazers 

Post#1402 » by Jimmy76 » Sat Apr 24, 2010 10:36 pm

PacificBlazer wrote:Its the playoffs, time to man up Phoenix.

you guys go from "boo hoo poor us" to trash talking fools incredibly quick
EtchenBa
Starter
Posts: 2,156
And1: 573
Joined: Jun 28, 2008
 

Re: WC Playoffs: (3) Suns vs. (6) Blazers 

Post#1403 » by EtchenBa » Sat Apr 24, 2010 10:36 pm

Kerrsed wrote:
EtchenBa wrote:
Kerrsed wrote:thats what players do when they know its a flagrant, they try to help the person up ASAP!


He also went for the ball though...it's not like he just clotheslined him or flat out shoved him.


Amare also got a Flagrant for an elbow that didnt make contact! So what is your point?


Flagrant fouls are for malicious and/or wreckless attempts. Amare's was malicious, Bayless's was neither.
Jimmy76
RealGM
Posts: 14,548
And1: 9
Joined: May 01, 2009

Re: WC Playoffs: (3) Suns vs. (6) Blazers 

Post#1404 » by Jimmy76 » Sat Apr 24, 2010 10:40 pm

jesus our shooting has been bad
Jimmy76
RealGM
Posts: 14,548
And1: 9
Joined: May 01, 2009

Re: WC Playoffs: (3) Suns vs. (6) Blazers 

Post#1405 » by Jimmy76 » Sat Apr 24, 2010 10:41 pm

rest nash for 2 minutes

then i want him right back
User avatar
PacificBlazer
Starter
Posts: 2,129
And1: 128
Joined: Jul 06, 2008
Location: Union, Oregon
     

Re: WC Playoffs: (3) Suns vs. (6) Blazers 

Post#1406 » by PacificBlazer » Sat Apr 24, 2010 10:41 pm

Jimmy76 wrote:
PacificBlazer wrote:Its the playoffs, time to man up Phoenix.

you guys go from "boo hoo poor us" to trash talking fools incredibly quick


I'm talking about the Suns players flopping and complaining to the refs every other play. Don't take it personally man :wink:
Oh hi Realgm
User avatar
Kerrsed
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 29,876
And1: 16,578
Joined: Mar 31, 2009
Location: Land of the Internet Memes
Contact:
     

Re: WC Playoffs: (3) Suns vs. (6) Blazers 

Post#1407 » by Kerrsed » Sat Apr 24, 2010 10:43 pm

EtchenBa wrote:Flagrant fouls are for unnecessary and/or excessive contact.. Amare's was non contact, Bayless's was contact.


Fixed! :D

Read the NBA rules

http://www.nba.com/analysis/rules_12.html?nav=ArticleList
Its #DUMPSTERFIRE SEASON! #TeamTRAINWRECK -KERRSED- The Mod, The Myth, The Legend
Image
Jimmy76
RealGM
Posts: 14,548
And1: 9
Joined: May 01, 2009

Re: WC Playoffs: (3) Suns vs. (6) Blazers 

Post#1408 » by Jimmy76 » Sat Apr 24, 2010 10:44 pm

PacificBlazer wrote:
Jimmy76 wrote:
PacificBlazer wrote:Its the playoffs, time to man up Phoenix.

you guys go from "boo hoo poor us" to trash talking fools incredibly quick


I'm talking about the Suns players flopping and complaining to the refs every other play. Don't take it personally man :wink:

I didnt :wink:

was commenting on how quickly you guys change your stripes

aka "doom and gloom afternoon" gamethread where you guys predicted the suns would win by 50 to acting cocky
User avatar
Cro_Ruption
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,875
And1: 93
Joined: Jul 03, 2008
Location: P-TOWN

Re: WC Playoffs: (3) Suns vs. (6) Blazers 

Post#1409 » by Cro_Ruption » Sat Apr 24, 2010 10:44 pm

good game from both sides so far.
SharoneWright wrote:I would not trade Bargs for Roy.

Monster or no.

i said it. And I live in a flame retardent suit.
Jimmy76
RealGM
Posts: 14,548
And1: 9
Joined: May 01, 2009

Re: WC Playoffs: (3) Suns vs. (6) Blazers 

Post#1410 » by Jimmy76 » Sat Apr 24, 2010 10:45 pm

STOP BARBOSA ISOS
Jimmy76
RealGM
Posts: 14,548
And1: 9
Joined: May 01, 2009

Re: WC Playoffs: (3) Suns vs. (6) Blazers 

Post#1411 » by Jimmy76 » Sat Apr 24, 2010 10:46 pm

unecessary duds
Greatness
RealGM
Posts: 12,638
And1: 4,556
Joined: Aug 23, 2009
Location: Toronto
     

Re: WC Playoffs: (3) Suns vs. (6) Blazers 

Post#1412 » by Greatness » Sat Apr 24, 2010 10:47 pm

Amare is a beast.
Greatness
RealGM
Posts: 12,638
And1: 4,556
Joined: Aug 23, 2009
Location: Toronto
     

Re: WC Playoffs: (3) Suns vs. (6) Blazers 

Post#1413 » by Greatness » Sat Apr 24, 2010 10:48 pm

Terrible call
studcrackers
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 52,226
And1: 6,100
Joined: Oct 31, 2004
Location: Getting hit in the head
         

Re: WC Playoffs: (3) Suns vs. (6) Blazers 

Post#1414 » by studcrackers » Sat Apr 24, 2010 10:49 pm

Superman5190 wrote:Terrible call
Jugs wrote: I saw two buttholes
Jimmy76
RealGM
Posts: 14,548
And1: 9
Joined: May 01, 2009

Re: WC Playoffs: (3) Suns vs. (6) Blazers 

Post#1415 » by Jimmy76 » Sat Apr 24, 2010 10:50 pm

nashty time plox

our o is weak without him
Greatness
RealGM
Posts: 12,638
And1: 4,556
Joined: Aug 23, 2009
Location: Toronto
     

Re: WC Playoffs: (3) Suns vs. (6) Blazers 

Post#1416 » by Greatness » Sat Apr 24, 2010 10:51 pm

How is that not a backcourt violation?
Jimmy76
RealGM
Posts: 14,548
And1: 9
Joined: May 01, 2009

Re: WC Playoffs: (3) Suns vs. (6) Blazers 

Post#1417 » by Jimmy76 » Sat Apr 24, 2010 10:51 pm

4 team fouls already

****

GET NASH IN
studcrackers
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 52,226
And1: 6,100
Joined: Oct 31, 2004
Location: Getting hit in the head
         

Re: WC Playoffs: (3) Suns vs. (6) Blazers 

Post#1418 » by studcrackers » Sat Apr 24, 2010 10:52 pm

Superman5190 wrote:How is that not a backcourt violation?


i always thought that wasnt a backcourt violation since you dont have control of the ball
Jugs wrote: I saw two buttholes
EtchenBa
Starter
Posts: 2,156
And1: 573
Joined: Jun 28, 2008
 

Re: WC Playoffs: (3) Suns vs. (6) Blazers 

Post#1419 » by EtchenBa » Sat Apr 24, 2010 10:52 pm

Kerrsed wrote:
EtchenBa wrote:Flagrant fouls are for unnecessary and/or excessive contact.. Amare's was non contact, Bayless's was contact.


Fixed! :D

Read the NBA rules

http://www.nba.com/analysis/rules_12.html?nav=ArticleList


Ok, so then can we agree that NEITHER should be called a flagrant?
User avatar
Kerrsed
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 29,876
And1: 16,578
Joined: Mar 31, 2009
Location: Land of the Internet Memes
Contact:
     

Re: WC Playoffs: (3) Suns vs. (6) Blazers 

Post#1420 » by Kerrsed » Sat Apr 24, 2010 10:52 pm

studcrackers wrote:
Superman5190 wrote:How is that not a backcourt violation?


i always thought that wasnt a backcourt violation since you dont have control of the ball


+1
Its #DUMPSTERFIRE SEASON! #TeamTRAINWRECK -KERRSED- The Mod, The Myth, The Legend
Image

Return to The General Board