Kyrie Trade Discussion Continued

Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285

Will Kyrie be traded by the beginning of the season?

Yes
304
60%
No
144
29%
Not suer
56
11%
 
Total votes: 504

Stillwater
RealGM
Posts: 15,734
And1: 3,655
Joined: Jun 15, 2017
   

Re: Kyrie Trade Discussion Continued 

Post#1581 » by Stillwater » Sat Aug 5, 2017 4:27 pm

NavLDO wrote:
Stillwater wrote:
NavLDO wrote:
Funny. EB has 1700 less Career MP than KI. And defensively, KI has NEVER been close to EB...who has 78 or 60% more BLKs and 78 or 15% more STLs. As a rebounder, KI has NEVER been close to EB...who has 293 or 20+% more TRBs. And throughout their careers, per 100 possessions, EB has more Assts.

Now, I know everything is 'offensively oriented' when comparing players, and yes, Kyrie has a .873 to .800 advantage in FT%, but when KI's FTr is only .259 to EB's is .376, it evens out, and EB makes as many FTs per36 as KI does.

But let's go to more recent times...like, this past season to see how they matchup. Interesting. Despite KI having fellow All-NBAers such as LeBron and Love, and quality players like TT on the team, and as you and other Cav fans have described, EB has been playing with 'scrubs' the likes of Warren, Bender, Chriss, and, yet shoot, our best player being Booker, it's quite telling, don't you think, that EB had a higher BPM, and equal VORP to KI this past season, and has a higher Asst ratio.

But yeah, you're probably right; KI is a lot better player than EB. It'll be interesting to see, after the trade how all these numbers stack up...

Interesting points, could be I have undervalued Bledsoe but simply saying KI is a lot better, but if he is so much on par with Irving, why in the world would the Suns be so interested in trading for KI? The fact is, KI is a much more threatening force for opposing teams to deal with,regardless of win shares,defensive efficiency and overall player impact. Bledsoe is a solid borderline all star guard, and I am not taking anything away from him by saying KI is better. The bottom line to me is this; Irving is the hardest guard to defend in the league,and their are few who can touch that including Bledsoe.


Because of two reasons:

1) Kyrie is 2.5 years younger and fits our timeline better

2) Kyrie is a 'bigger name draw' than Bledsoe is, plain and simple. The Suns need FAs to want to come to Phoenix. Booker? OK, that's nice. Jackson? Maybe, we'll have to see. But Kyrie, Booker, and ...insert new FA, and all of a sudden, maybe the Suns aren't so bad after all.

To me, that's why the Suns want Kyrie. I'm not saying Kyrie isn't better; I'm saying that to discount Bledsoe so easily is not fair. Bledsoe is more of a 1b to Kyrie's 1a, than a Kyrie is >>>>>>> Bledsoe...that's all I'm saying.

Yeah I agree with that for the most part, but I do not think that a Org that has been to 3 straight finals like Cleveland values Bledsoe as a 1b more like a 1c or 1d for those same reasons you mentioned regarding the "entertainment" aspect playing into a players value. Irving is mostly as popular as he is because of his 1 elite skill of breaking defenders down,and then add the trickery and really mastery of putting English on the ball to use the glass so efficiently and with such a high rate of success even against the strongest defensive player or players.
I think to understand what a players value is to the owners of these franchises it has to be not only looking at a stat sheet % and roster build timing etc as much as it relates to what he brings to a franchise as a seat filler and game changer and like you said a recruiter of other elite players in FA.
I get The Suns being Patient and maybe this is not the year they go after such a player, but not going after a player of Irvings value when one is unexpectedly available,& you have the assets to get him, even if the rest of the team is not ready to win a playoffs game let alone a finals game yet,is not necessarily something you can easily pass on, because they are in the business of making money, & even with Irving are not making the playoffs next year, but it would not be out of the question in 2018-2019.
I definitely do not think the Cavs will take back Bender, maybe Chriss instead of Jackson if the Suns are willing to part with their own 2018 pick instead of Miami's, but I cannot see Bender being enough. He could turn out to be better then Jackson and Chriss, but the rookie season looked less than good enough even for a young player fighting injuries,to be appealing in a deal for Irving.
SUNDOWN BRINGS A WELCOME CHANGE TO EVERYTHING THAT'S HIDING
Fo-Real
General Manager
Posts: 9,841
And1: 5,535
Joined: Mar 21, 2009
     

Re: Kyrie Trade Discussion Continued 

Post#1582 » by Fo-Real » Sat Aug 5, 2017 4:34 pm

I think the Suns have put out there what they would give up (Bled, Bender and a first). I think the Cavs should very publicly say no and each team should break contact and move on. Bledso should no longer be an option for the Cavs and they should focus on who they will find to replace Kyrie this year. I personally was and still am excited to see Bled and Booker start the year, I like Bleds defense next to Booker. Excited to see the kids (Chriss, Bender, and Ulis) all in their second year. Excited to see Jackson and Warren decide who gets the lions share of p/t at sf. Both teams need to move on from eachother, WHAT PG IS CLEVLAND GONNA GO GET TO COMPETE GUYS?
User avatar
Ferulci
Starter
Posts: 2,484
And1: 2,551
Joined: Nov 15, 2009
Location: France

Re: Kyrie Trade Discussion Continued 

Post#1583 » by Ferulci » Sat Aug 5, 2017 4:38 pm

XPeak wrote:So now it's...

Bledsoe
Bender

That's too low.

Bledsoe
JJ
Chandler

Seems like a fair enough return.

No way Phoenix agrees to this, especially since Kyrie wont commit. Replace JJ by Warren and add a first pick and it seems fair to me.
buckboy wrote:
jg77 wrote:Lavine is my dark horse MVP candidate.

That is the darkest horse that has ever galloped.
phraoh
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,814
And1: 723
Joined: Jul 05, 2007

Re: Kyrie Trade Discussion Continued 

Post#1584 » by phraoh » Sat Aug 5, 2017 5:03 pm

[quote="Fo-Real"]I think the Suns have put out there what they would give up (Bled, Bender and a first). I think the Cavs should very publicly say no and each team should break contact and move on. Bledso should no longer be an option for the Cavs and they should focus on who they will find to replace Kyrie this year. I personally was and still am excited to see Bled and Booker start the year, I like Bleds defense next to Booker. Excited to see the kids (Chriss, Bender, and Ulis) all in their second year. Excited to see Jackson and Warren decide who gets the lions share of p/t at sf. Both teams need to move on from eachother, WHAT PG IS CLEVLAND GONNA GO GET TO COMPETE GUYS?[/quote]

Pretty sure Phoenix is very very interested in Kyrie, because he is an exciting young all star. Anyone believes that teams put out their best offers in public...well that's probably the most ridiculous thing I have heard, and hopefully you don't believe Suns have put out what their best offer is. Phoenix isn't walking away because they haven't gotten their ideal trade done yet, same as Cavs aren't walking away. Only each FO knows what is the least they will take/most they will gave, and even they might not know. Not sure what else has been offered, but pretty sure its better than Bledsoe, Bender, and a non lottery 1st. Finally, if Cavs trade Kyrie and it doesn't include a pg back, they will just go with Rose and Calderon, and look to deal for a pg similar to Bledsoe value as they year goes on, with some of the assets received via the Kyrie trade.
Fo-Real
General Manager
Posts: 9,841
And1: 5,535
Joined: Mar 21, 2009
     

Re: Kyrie Trade Discussion Continued 

Post#1585 » by Fo-Real » Sat Aug 5, 2017 5:13 pm

No, I SAID what I really hope. I hope each should move on from eachother. You do you Cavs, really.
mg
General Manager
Posts: 8,821
And1: 4,672
Joined: Jun 12, 2003

Re: Kyrie Trade Discussion Continued 

Post#1586 » by mg » Sat Aug 5, 2017 5:20 pm

Fo-Real wrote:No, I SAID what I really hope. I hope each should move on from eachother. You do you Cavs, really.


I don't think Kyrie ends up in PHX either but still believe the Suns would be better long term with a younger healthier PG to grow with the rest of the core which is a totally different discussion. That was obviously the plan last season and leading up to the draft too as Bledsoe rested much of last season.
BasketballFan7
Analyst
Posts: 3,668
And1: 2,344
Joined: Mar 11, 2015
   

Re: Kyrie Trade Discussion Continued 

Post#1587 » by BasketballFan7 » Sat Aug 5, 2017 6:08 pm

I'm still hoping for a miraculous, out of left field Charlotte or Memphis trade.
FGA Restricted All-Time Draft

In My Hood, The Bullies Get Bullied
PG: 2013 Mike Conley, 1998 Greg Anthony
SG: 2005 Manu Ginobili, 2015 Khris Middleton
SF: 1991 Scottie Pippen
PF: 1986 Larry Bird, 1996 Dennis Rodman
C: 1999 Alonzo Mourning
NBAfan3024
RealGM
Posts: 16,567
And1: 7,035
Joined: May 25, 2013
Contact:
 

Re: Kyrie Trade Discussion Continued 

Post#1588 » by NBAfan3024 » Sat Aug 5, 2017 6:19 pm

I'm sure he gets moved somewhere that nobody expects
Guest202
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,583
And1: 1,245
Joined: Jun 14, 2014
 

Re: Kyrie Trade Discussion Continued 

Post#1589 » by Guest202 » Sat Aug 5, 2017 6:36 pm

NBAfan3024 wrote:I'm sure he gets moved somewhere that nobody expects


He's going to the Pistons, I think.
NatiboyB
Rookie
Posts: 1,080
And1: 391
Joined: Jun 15, 2013

Re: Kyrie Trade Discussion Continued 

Post#1590 » by NatiboyB » Sat Aug 5, 2017 6:37 pm

Guest202 wrote:
NBAfan3024 wrote:I'm sure he gets moved somewhere that nobody expects


He's going to the Pistons, I think.



Gilbert kind of benefits in a way from Kyrie going to the Pistons especially if they increase ticket sales due to having a star. I may be reading into it too much but I wonder what the Pistons could send it's not like Reggie Jackson is worth a lot.
Guest202
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,583
And1: 1,245
Joined: Jun 14, 2014
 

Re: Kyrie Trade Discussion Continued 

Post#1591 » by Guest202 » Sat Aug 5, 2017 6:39 pm

NatiboyB wrote:
Guest202 wrote:
NBAfan3024 wrote:I'm sure he gets moved somewhere that nobody expects


He's going to the Pistons, I think.



Gilbert kind of benefits in a way from Kyrie going to the Pistons especially if they increase ticket sales due to having a star.


And Gilbert and Tom Gores (Pistons owner) are pals, as well as partners on bringing an MLS soccer franchise to Detroit.
NatiboyB
Rookie
Posts: 1,080
And1: 391
Joined: Jun 15, 2013

Re: Kyrie Trade Discussion Continued 

Post#1592 » by NatiboyB » Sat Aug 5, 2017 6:48 pm

Guest202 wrote:
NatiboyB wrote:
Guest202 wrote:
He's going to the Pistons, I think.



Gilbert kind of benefits in a way from Kyrie going to the Pistons especially if they increase ticket sales due to having a star.


And Gilbert and Tom Gores (Pistons owner) are pals, as well as partners on bringing an MLS soccer franchise to Detroit.



But is it possible the Pistons maybe involving a 3rd team could help put a good package together?
Stillwater
RealGM
Posts: 15,734
And1: 3,655
Joined: Jun 15, 2017
   

Re: Kyrie Trade Discussion Continued 

Post#1593 » by Stillwater » Sat Aug 5, 2017 7:39 pm

NatiboyB wrote:
Guest202 wrote:
NBAfan3024 wrote:I'm sure he gets moved somewhere that nobody expects


He's going to the Pistons, I think.



Gilbert kind of benefits in a way from Kyrie going to the Pistons especially if they increase ticket sales due to having a star. I may be reading into it too much but I wonder what the Pistons could send it's not like Reggie Jackson is worth a lot.

This is about the only deal I would accept , all hinging on Bradley ;don't know about Altman and Gilbert interest in Drummond as you can't keep him on the floor at the end of the game, but he is still a rebounding machine and probably enough to get the deal done
https://basketball.realgm.com/tradechecker/saved_trade/6932321
SUNDOWN BRINGS A WELCOME CHANGE TO EVERYTHING THAT'S HIDING
BasketballFan7
Analyst
Posts: 3,668
And1: 2,344
Joined: Mar 11, 2015
   

Re: Kyrie Trade Discussion Continued 

Post#1594 » by BasketballFan7 » Sat Aug 5, 2017 8:00 pm

Stillwater wrote:
NatiboyB wrote:
Guest202 wrote:
He's going to the Pistons, I think.



Gilbert kind of benefits in a way from Kyrie going to the Pistons especially if they increase ticket sales due to having a star. I may be reading into it too much but I wonder what the Pistons could send it's not like Reggie Jackson is worth a lot.

This is about the only deal I would accept , all hinging on Bradley ;don't know about Altman and Gilbert interest in Drummond as you can't keep him on the floor at the end of the game, but he is still a rebounding machine and probably enough to get the deal done
https://basketball.realgm.com/tradechecker/saved_trade/6932321


I think you're going to be disappointed when the trade comes.
FGA Restricted All-Time Draft

In My Hood, The Bullies Get Bullied
PG: 2013 Mike Conley, 1998 Greg Anthony
SG: 2005 Manu Ginobili, 2015 Khris Middleton
SF: 1991 Scottie Pippen
PF: 1986 Larry Bird, 1996 Dennis Rodman
C: 1999 Alonzo Mourning
Stillwater
RealGM
Posts: 15,734
And1: 3,655
Joined: Jun 15, 2017
   

Re: Kyrie Trade Discussion Continued 

Post#1595 » by Stillwater » Sat Aug 5, 2017 9:22 pm

BasketballFan7 wrote:
Stillwater wrote:
NatiboyB wrote:

Gilbert kind of benefits in a way from Kyrie going to the Pistons especially if they increase ticket sales due to having a star. I may be reading into it too much but I wonder what the Pistons could send it's not like Reggie Jackson is worth a lot.

This is about the only deal I would accept , all hinging on Bradley ;don't know about Altman and Gilbert interest in Drummond as you can't keep him on the floor at the end of the game, but he is still a rebounding machine and probably enough to get the deal done
https://basketball.realgm.com/tradechecker/saved_trade/6932321


I think you're going to be disappointed when the trade comes.

you mean if this trade comes to fruition? or you mean the Cav's are going to trade Irving for less than that?
If it's the latter the only thing I can gather from the idea of trading him for less is they get worse , and so therefore it is unlikely for them to pull the trigger on any deal that doesn't at bare minimum get them close to what the are giving up.
So I would definitely be disappointed if they go through with a trade that is a total loss as opposed to forcing him into disgruntled service and taking a total loss in 2 years.
SUNDOWN BRINGS A WELCOME CHANGE TO EVERYTHING THAT'S HIDING
Jack Dempsey
Pro Prospect
Posts: 866
And1: 544
Joined: Sep 17, 2015

Re: Kyrie Trade Discussion Continued 

Post#1596 » by Jack Dempsey » Sat Aug 5, 2017 10:58 pm

DowJones wrote:
Jack Dempsey wrote:
Dupp wrote:
From my perspective this is one of the worst deals floated around.

Just curious, what REALISTIC deal (no JJ, Wiggins, Harris&Murray,...) would you prefer?


I like Kyrie for Chandler-Murray-2018 Denver 1st.

I think this is one of the most reasonable Kyrie-trades I've seen. Unlike the Suns, the Nuggets are already a very good team that is missing just a piece or two. In their position it would be worth taking a risk on another Allstar if they feel he can make them contenders.
Mulhollanddrive
RealGM
Posts: 12,555
And1: 8,337
Joined: Jan 19, 2013

Re: Kyrie Trade Discussion Continued 

Post#1597 » by Mulhollanddrive » Sun Aug 6, 2017 1:33 am

Bledsoe, Warren, Miami 1st vs Chandler, Murray, Denver 1st

I don't know why one gets panned at every mention yet the next is a great deal.
User avatar
RCM88x
RealGM
Posts: 15,239
And1: 19,171
Joined: May 31, 2015
Location: Lebron Ball
     

Re: Kyrie Trade Discussion Continued 

Post#1598 » by RCM88x » Sun Aug 6, 2017 1:36 am

Mulhollanddrive wrote:Bledsoe, Bender, Miami 1st vs Chandler, Murray, Denver 1st

I don't know why one gets panned at every mention yet the next is a great deal.


I don't understand how anyone would consider the 2nd over the first.

Bledsoe is an infinitely better player than Chandler. Bender and Murry are basically two non factors until next season, even if Murry is the better player the advantage Bledsoe has over Chandler is massive. And the Miami pick will most likely be better than the Denver pick.
Image

LookToShoot wrote:Melo is the only player that makes the Rockets watchable for the basketball purists. Otherwise it would just be three point shots and pick n roll.
nomansland
Head Coach
Posts: 7,029
And1: 5,445
Joined: Mar 02, 2013
   

Re: Kyrie Trade Discussion Continued 

Post#1599 » by nomansland » Sun Aug 6, 2017 5:12 am

RCM88x wrote:
Mulhollanddrive wrote:Bledsoe, Bender, Miami 1st vs Chandler, Murray, Denver 1st

I don't know why one gets panned at every mention yet the next is a great deal.


I don't understand how anyone would consider the 2nd over the first.

Bledsoe is an infinitely better player than Chandler. Bender and Murry are basically two non factors until next season, even if Murry is the better player the advantage Bledsoe has over Chandler is massive. And the Miami pick will most likely be better than the Denver pick.



Rumors are Murray's off the table. Denver wouldn't include him in a Butler trade, why would they do it for Irving?

And I don't see why a deal with the Suns makes sense. Even if they get him they're going to be terrible and by the time they start to turn things around his contract will be up.

I see him staying with Cleveland or going to a dark horse 3rd team.
isucb
Sophomore
Posts: 105
And1: 58
Joined: Aug 15, 2016
 

Re: Kyrie Trade Discussion Continued 

Post#1600 » by isucb » Sun Aug 6, 2017 5:27 am

Wish Jazz could get in on Kyrie, they would be the perfect team to hide his weaknesses (mainly defense) and really let him do what he's good at 3pt shooting. Doubt they have what the cavs need though for a trade to work out.

Return to The General Board