LessEyeTest wrote:HMFFL wrote:I will say this and I hope you soak it in. Jokic won't be relevant once he retires if he doesn't win a championship. History has proven it with other all time greats.LessEyeTest wrote:
Rings are team accomplishments fwiw. I would never hold it against Jokic for not winning a title when he's played with 0 all-stars in his 8 year career. Hell, even guys like LeBron who I consider serious floor raisers and capable of carrying teams to titles played with all-stars and won nothing until he basically teamed up with 2 other all-stars and countless HOFers...
Sent from my SM-N975U using RealGM mobile app
By the casuals? Sure. But anyone who can think critically about the situation will realize that no NBA superstar has ever gone an entire career without playing alongside another superstar. Jokic is 8 seasons into his career and no all-star teammate coming into view - if Gordon makes it that's based purely on Jokic raising his game from the journeyman bum he was into an all-star.
The experts (aka people paid to write their opinions) will view his advanced metrics + individual awards and realize he stacks up along all the other GOATs and greats. Easy to win a title when you have guys like Havlicek / Cousy, McHale / Parish, Abdul Jabbar / Worthy, Pippen/Rodman, Robinson/Manu/Parker, Kobe, Wade/Bosh, Gasol, etc.
Now compare that to ... Aaron Gordon.
To be in the top 10 of all time Jokic definitely needs chips multiple ones. To be an all time great you need chips why do you think Lebron went to the Heat



