[2017 NBA Draft Discussion] - (1: PHI, 2: LAL, 3: BOS)!
Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285
Re: [2017 NBA Draft Discussion] - (1: BOS, 2: LAL, 3: PHI)!
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 34,982
- And1: 28,608
- Joined: May 17, 2007
-
Re: [2017 NBA Draft Discussion] - (1: BOS, 2: LAL, 3: PHI)!
Lakers are throwing all kinds of smoke out there lol
Re: [2017 NBA Draft Discussion] - (1: BOS, 2: LAL, 3: PHI)!
- JellosJigglin
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,525
- And1: 9,565
- Joined: Jul 14, 2004
Re: [2017 NBA Draft Discussion] - (1: BOS, 2: LAL, 3: PHI)!
- JellosJigglin
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,525
- And1: 9,565
- Joined: Jul 14, 2004
Re: [2017 NBA Draft Discussion] - (1: BOS, 2: LAL, 3: PHI)!
If JJ can play the 2 then he and Ingram would be an intriguing pair.
Re: [2017 NBA Draft Discussion] - (1: BOS, 2: LAL, 3: PHI)!
-
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,283
- And1: 644
- Joined: Jun 17, 2010
-
Re: [2017 NBA Draft Discussion] - (1: BOS, 2: LAL, 3: PHI)!
Why has Philly not worked anyone out for the 3rd pick? Do they got trade set up or is that how DC rolls? If they got a trade setup, then the question is with who. Could the lakers have an agreed trade of Delo to Philly for #3?
Re: [2017 NBA Draft Discussion] - (1: BOS, 2: LAL, 3: PHI)!
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 61,135
- And1: 33,831
- Joined: Oct 15, 2006
-
Re: [2017 NBA Draft Discussion] - (1: BOS, 2: LAL, 3: PHI)!
Mr.Raptorsingh wrote:Lakers are throwing all kinds of smoke out there lol
That's one benefit of hiring a former agent, Pelinka lives for this kind of maneuvering.



Re: [2017 NBA Draft Discussion] - (1: BOS, 2: LAL, 3: PHI)!
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,586
- And1: 12,327
- Joined: Feb 12, 2010
- Location: Somewhere in Boston
-
Re: [2017 NBA Draft Discussion] - (1: BOS, 2: LAL, 3: PHI)!
JellosJigglin wrote:If JJ can play the 2 then he and Ingram would be an intriguing pair.
Maybe Ingram at the 2? Or he's too slow for that? Ingram is the physically weaker of the two, so on this alone, he'd probably be better at the 2, but I dunno how his foot speed will affect him there.
Good assessment:
PLO wrote:Tatum played OK - took advantage of a few mismatches - decent on the defensive end. He is what we thought he was going into the season - a technically very proficient player operating close to his career ceiling as a rookie.
Re: RE: Re: [2017 NBA Draft Discussion] - (1: BOS, 2: LAL, 3: PHI)!
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,508
- And1: 7,058
- Joined: Mar 08, 2012
-
Re: RE: Re: [2017 NBA Draft Discussion] - (1: BOS, 2: LAL, 3: PHI)!
Boston34Bg wrote:JellosJigglin wrote:If JJ can play the 2 then he and Ingram would be an intriguing pair.
Maybe Ingram at the 2? Or he's too slow for that? Ingram is the physically weaker of the two, so on this alone, he'd probably be better at the 2, but I dunno how his foot speed will affect him there.
I don't see either of them being able to play the 2 in the long run. It would be an interesting scenario to keep track of if they pick him.
10/27/16
Nemesis21 wrote:It is absolutely hilarious hearing people still say Embiid has superstar potential.The guy is one injury away from being Greg Oden.Except Oden manged to play over 100 games in the NBA, I don't think Embiid will play more.
Re: [2017 NBA Draft Discussion] - (1: BOS, 2: LAL, 3: PHI)!
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,402
- And1: 7,411
- Joined: Jun 23, 2014
Re: [2017 NBA Draft Discussion] - (1: BOS, 2: LAL, 3: PHI)!
- JellosJigglin
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,525
- And1: 9,565
- Joined: Jul 14, 2004
Re: [2017 NBA Draft Discussion] - (1: BOS, 2: LAL, 3: PHI)!
Boston34Bg wrote:JellosJigglin wrote:If JJ can play the 2 then he and Ingram would be an intriguing pair.
Maybe Ingram at the 2? Or he's too slow for that? Ingram is the physically weaker of the two, so on this alone, he'd probably be better at the 2, but I dunno how his foot speed will affect him there.
Ingram can defend the 2 on a single possession basis but not full time. He got noticeably stronger as the season progressed but he still has a long way to go regarding lateral speed. Jackson is more athletic coming into the NBA than Ingram just based on the highlights I watched, and he has quick hands when playing on-ball defense. I think he'd have an easier time playing the 2 than Ingram. With the league running so many picks now they'd basically be interchangeable and switch on defense anyway.
Re: [2017 NBA Draft Discussion] - (1: BOS, 2: LAL, 3: PHI)!
- JellosJigglin
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,525
- And1: 9,565
- Joined: Jul 14, 2004
Re: [2017 NBA Draft Discussion] - (1: BOS, 2: LAL, 3: PHI)!
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 38,753
- And1: 22,818
- Joined: Oct 08, 2013
-
Re: [2017 NBA Draft Discussion] - (1: BOS, 2: LAL, 3: PHI)!
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,941
- And1: 5,624
- Joined: Jan 19, 2014
- Location: Perth, Western Australia
-
Re: [2017 NBA Draft Discussion] - (1: BOS, 2: LAL, 3: PHI)!
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,240
- And1: 5,738
- Joined: Jan 06, 2015
Re: [2017 NBA Draft Discussion] - (1: BOS, 2: LAL, 3: PHI)!
Yeah, at least he's having fun with it.
Re: [2017 NBA Draft Discussion] - (1: BOS, 2: LAL, 3: PHI)!
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 7,504
- And1: 2,972
- Joined: Jun 14, 2009
Re: [2017 NBA Draft Discussion] - (1: BOS, 2: LAL, 3: PHI)!
Magic Johnson said the Lakers are trying to schedule another workout for Lonzo Ball.
If Magic can make this happen, Ball will join Josh Jackson as the second player to visit with the Lakers twice. Ball was reportedly a little out of shape during his first visit, so maybe the Lakers want to give him another chance to prove himself. There have been many conflicting reports about what the Lakers will do with the second overall pick, but Ball is still considered the favorite to land in Los Angeles over the likes of Jackson and De'Aaron Fox.
http://www.rotoworld.com/sports/nba/basketball?ls=roto:nba:gnav
If Magic can make this happen, Ball will join Josh Jackson as the second player to visit with the Lakers twice. Ball was reportedly a little out of shape during his first visit, so maybe the Lakers want to give him another chance to prove himself. There have been many conflicting reports about what the Lakers will do with the second overall pick, but Ball is still considered the favorite to land in Los Angeles over the likes of Jackson and De'Aaron Fox.
http://www.rotoworld.com/sports/nba/basketball?ls=roto:nba:gnav
Re: [2017 NBA Draft Discussion] - (1: BOS, 2: LAL, 3: PHI)!
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,240
- And1: 5,738
- Joined: Jan 06, 2015
Re: [2017 NBA Draft Discussion] - (1: BOS, 2: LAL, 3: PHI)!
nevetslc wrote:
This looks like JJ explaining the car kicking incident...
Re: [2017 NBA Draft Discussion] - (1: BOS, 2: LAL, 3: PHI)!
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 38,753
- And1: 22,818
- Joined: Oct 08, 2013
-
Re: [2017 NBA Draft Discussion] - (1: BOS, 2: LAL, 3: PHI)!
Patsfan1081 wrote:nevetslc wrote:
This looks like JJ explaining the car kicking incident...
Magic is huge
Re: [2017 NBA Draft Discussion] - (1: BOS, 2: LAL, 3: PHI)!
- Mylie10
- RealGM
- Posts: 41,240
- And1: 9,618
- Joined: Sep 16, 2005
- Location: * Chokers! *
- Contact:
-
Re: [2017 NBA Draft Discussion] - (1: BOS, 2: LAL, 3: PHI)!
Right on Lonzo!!!
I'd be shocked if the Lakers don't take Lonzo. I'd be more shocked if the Celtics took him first. But no way Magic passes on the dude if hes there. I mean Magic was a big pg who affected the game in many ways. I'm sure he sees some of that in Lonzo. I know I do.
Khoee wrote “
”Mav_Carter wrote: my list doesn't matter...I'm pretty much wrong on everything...
Re: RE: Re: [2017 NBA Draft Discussion] - (1: BOS, 2: LAL, 3: PHI)!
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 61,135
- And1: 33,831
- Joined: Oct 15, 2006
-
Re: RE: Re: [2017 NBA Draft Discussion] - (1: BOS, 2: LAL, 3: PHI)!
XtremeDunkz wrote:Boston34Bg wrote:JellosJigglin wrote:If JJ can play the 2 then he and Ingram would be an intriguing pair.
Maybe Ingram at the 2? Or he's too slow for that? Ingram is the physically weaker of the two, so on this alone, he'd probably be better at the 2, but I dunno how his foot speed will affect him there.
I don't see either of them being able to play the 2 in the long run. It would be an interesting scenario to keep track of if they pick him.
Ingram will be a PF as soon as he adds some bulk and Jackson is a SF.



Re: [2017 NBA Draft Discussion] - (1: BOS, 2: LAL, 3: PHI)!
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 61,135
- And1: 33,831
- Joined: Oct 15, 2006
-
Re: [2017 NBA Draft Discussion] - (1: BOS, 2: LAL, 3: PHI)!
taj2133 wrote:Magic Johnson said the Lakers are trying to schedule another workout for Lonzo Ball.
If Magic can make this happen, Ball will join Josh Jackson as the second player to visit with the Lakers twice. Ball was reportedly a little out of shape during his first visit, so maybe the Lakers want to give him another chance to prove himself. There have been many conflicting reports about what the Lakers will do with the second overall pick, but Ball is still considered the favorite to land in Los Angeles over the likes of Jackson and De'Aaron Fox.
http://www.rotoworld.com/sports/nba/basketball?ls=roto:nba:gnav
Jackson's first workout was in Sacramento and the Lakers were more or less casual observers there. Bringing him to LA for a personal workout was his first exclusively for the team.



Re: RE: Re: [2017 NBA Draft Discussion] - (1: BOS, 2: LAL, 3: PHI)!
- sixerswillrule
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,683
- And1: 3,625
- Joined: Jul 24, 2003
- Location: Disappointment
Re: RE: Re: [2017 NBA Draft Discussion] - (1: BOS, 2: LAL, 3: PHI)!
XtremeDunkz wrote:Boston34Bg wrote:JellosJigglin wrote:If JJ can play the 2 then he and Ingram would be an intriguing pair.
Maybe Ingram at the 2? Or he's too slow for that? Ingram is the physically weaker of the two, so on this alone, he'd probably be better at the 2, but I dunno how his foot speed will affect him there.
I don't see either of them being able to play the 2 in the long run. It would be an interesting scenario to keep track of if they pick him.
Jackson should be able to defend the 2. And there's enough ball-handling in a Russell/Jackson/Ingram backcourt.