JohnWillow wrote:Boston fans happy about this?
Honestly it's the idea of having to play against Smart on another team that terrifies me more so than the idea of not having Smart on the C's.
Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285

JohnWillow wrote:Boston fans happy about this?

_qubik wrote:phanman wrote:_qubik wrote:Hmm, tricky situation. He is great at all times on defense, but for sure he is a question mark on offense, sometimes can and other cant shoot, isnt a lead guard and the Celtics tried to use like one. He is a very goot starter, if he could get a good starting (real) PG I would do the trade. Maybe he is enough for a S&T for Lonzo ? Devonte Graham if they receive draft compensation maybe ? Would Toronto consider receiving him for Lowry ?
I'd love to bring in Smart vs paying Trent. A Fred/Smart/OG/Pascal/FA Center would be fun to watch.
Who needs center ? Moves Pascal there and let put the draft pick to work, it looks like he will be a nice defender. Dont know on offense, but it would be a headache to score against this squad.
iamworthy wrote:phanman wrote:With Kemba shipped out, why would they be shopping Smart too? Whose gonna man the point full time? -Pritchard?? He's not ready to become a full time starter on a team that is looking to compete.
Dennis Schroeder?
Joshyjess wrote:iamworthy wrote:phanman wrote:With Kemba shipped out, why would they be shopping Smart too? Whose gonna man the point full time? -Pritchard?? He's not ready to become a full time starter on a team that is looking to compete.
Dennis Schroeder?
Really? That kind of language is just uncalled for. Go wash your mouth out with soap.

celticfan42487 wrote:Wait, we already dumped Hayward and Kemba.
The owners can't be worried about luxury tax concerns. The compromise to make sure they'd never have to pay a cent was either paying Fournier or Smart.
There's no reason to dump Smart if we're losing Fournier for free.
Like the owners don't make more money if they're 10 mil under the cap vs 10 cents under the cap.
This doesn't pass the sniff test unless they really think Smart is going to get the max next off season. Don't get me wrong, someone will throw 20ish mil a year at him, but with everyone else on the roster gutted and full of nothing but draft picks that shouldn't be a concern.
Joshyjess wrote:iamworthy wrote:phanman wrote:With Kemba shipped out, why would they be shopping Smart too? Whose gonna man the point full time? -Pritchard?? He's not ready to become a full time starter on a team that is looking to compete.
Dennis Schroeder?
Really? That kind of language is just uncalled for. Go wash your mouth out with soap.
chrisab123 wrote:celticfan42487 wrote:Wait, we already dumped Hayward and Kemba.
The owners can't be worried about luxury tax concerns. The compromise to make sure they'd never have to pay a cent was either paying Fournier or Smart.
There's no reason to dump Smart if we're losing Fournier for free.
Like the owners don't make more money if they're 10 mil under the cap vs 10 cents under the cap.
This doesn't pass the sniff test unless they really think Smart is going to get the max next off season. Don't get me wrong, someone will throw 20ish mil a year at him, but with everyone else on the roster gutted and full of nothing but draft picks that shouldn't be a concern.
If the Celtics throw 20 million + at Smart next offseason they might as well start the process early of trading Tatum. He's not staying to play on a team where most of the money is tied up between Smart himself and Brown. Smart is a good role player not someone who is slotted to be a member of a big 3.

CraftylikeaFox wrote:_qubik wrote:Hmm, tricky situation. He is great at all times on defense, but for sure he is a question mark on offense, sometimes can and other cant shoot, isnt a lead guard and the Celtics tried to use like one. He is a very goot starter, if he could get a good starting (real) PG I would do the trade. Maybe he is enough for a S&T for Lonzo ? Devonte Graham if they receive draft compensation maybe ? Would Toronto consider receiving him for Lowry ?
If NO brought on Smart for Lonzo, I would demand a trade if I was Zion because that would tell me once and for all that the front office there has absolutely no idea what they are doing.
Johnny Bball wrote:Unless he's planning on a teardown and rebuild, this makes zero sense.
Deep into that darkness peering, long I stood there wondering, fearing, Doubting, dreaming dreams no mortal ever dared to dream before;
EArl wrote:S&T for Schroder? We could use a 3&D PG.
Some random troll wrote:Not to sound negative, but this team is owned by an arrogant cheapskate, managed by a moron and coached by an idiot. Recipe for disaster.
Winsome Gerbil wrote:EArl wrote:S&T for Schroder? We could use a 3&D PG.
Maybe the D part.
Deep into that darkness peering, long I stood there wondering, fearing, Doubting, dreaming dreams no mortal ever dared to dream before;
bisme37 wrote:A little while back there were articles about how Celtics players were frustrated that Brad Stevens loves Smart so much and favored him. Now Brad Stevens hates Smart and wants to trade him haha.