realball wrote:DusterBuster wrote:KnicksGadfly wrote:I don’t think Simmon’s value is that high, but people have to realize that it only takes one franchise that hasn’t been in the playoffs with one dumb owner and one GM under pressure to get Morey what he wants…
I got my money on Sacramento. LA would have been a candidate too but they’ve made their dumb move for the year already.
This is fair that it only takes one desperate team, the issue is most Sixer fans are completely pinpointing the wrong teams they incorrectly think are "desperate" (BOS, WAS, POR).
Kings make sense as one of those teams that could make a desperation trade, I think the problem being that Sacramento doesn't have much Morey is interested in. Morey wants a Top 30 player, a Top 30 player hasn't put on a Kings jersey since the early 2000's. The only way Simmons ends up in Sac is via a 3 team trade.
C'mon dude, Cousins wasn't that bad...
But you're right, no one is "desperate" enough to trade their star player for Simmons.
You know what, that's fair, I totally forgot about Cousins. He was Top 30 for awhile, but it doesn't really stick in my mind considering that even when he was in that range, the Kings still stunk.
More on topic though, yeah, that's my biggest gripe with Sixer fans here or anyone that wants to argue that a team will get "desperate" and make a trade for Simmons. It's one thing to be "desperate" to make a big trade, it's another thing to be willing to part with your best (Top 25-30) player. Those aren't things that generally coexist with one another.
Now you want to talk about a team that's been floundering for awhile, they may trade their best player(s), but they won't be top 25-30 guys.
Get ready to learn Chinese buddy... #YangBang