Poll: Public sees MJ as GOAT

Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285

Cavsfansince84
RealGM
Posts: 15,106
And1: 11,558
Joined: Jun 13, 2017
   

Re: Poll: Public sees MJ as GOAT 

Post#241 » by Cavsfansince84 » Sat Feb 18, 2023 7:04 am

michaelm wrote:I don't think Curry or KD is better than Lebron, and have not much interest in yet another Lebron vs MJ thread, but chanced upon your post were you posit KD and/or GSW stacked their team as opposed to Lebron, the biggest stacker of them all. He was perfectly entitled to do so with the Heatles and on his return to the Cavs imo , but as I said and you appear to have ignored it is the calling out of KD and to a lesser extent GSW for team stacking by Lebron fans in particular to which I object/find hypocritical. LeBron wanted to break the NBA with the Heatles and told the world this was his aim, which apparently should now be regarded as hyperbole, GSW told KD they could break the NBA with him and did so for one season at least, when that team was well in contention for being the best of all time. Why on earth shouldn't they have constructed the best team of all time if they could ?. o


Nope, that's not what I said and I don't think you really looked at the comment I quoted as a response to either(which I pointed out to you above). The other poster had said that Steph and a few others never needed to stack the deck the way LeBron did. I simply pointed out that they did just that by adding the 3rd best player to a team that had almost just won b2b titles. I didn't say anything about LeBron never stacking teams but as I also said, if the teams that LeBron were so stacked it never really materialized in the regular season. Maybe, just maybe its because his teams weren't nearly as stacked as people want to act like they were. Its one thing to say a guy like Love or Bosh was so great in a vacuum and its another to actually build a team from the ground up. More so when they aren't being asked to just put up box score numbers and being asked more to do things like play defense and fit in.
VanWest82
RealGM
Posts: 19,589
And1: 18,107
Joined: Dec 05, 2008

Re: Poll: Public sees MJ as GOAT 

Post#242 » by VanWest82 » Sat Feb 18, 2023 7:07 am

70sFan wrote:
VanWest82 wrote:
70sFan wrote:Love and LeBron pairing was absurdly good on the court. It seems that you care more about Love scoring more points than giving Cavs actual results.

Seems like you're speculating wildly and foolishly, and you'd be wrong.

Then what's your point? Love impact was maximized as a stretch big with passing skills. It made Cavs one of the best offensive teams in playoffs history. He didn't play like in Minny because he wasn't good enough to do that on top playoff offense with two elite ball-handlers. Love wouldn't average 25 ppg next to Jordan either.

His impact wasn't maximized. As with all Lebron teams, the offense fell apart as soon as Lebron sat. Cavs didn't run an offense other than Lebron ball. It never made any sense that Kyrie and Love, JR, Frye, RJ, etc. couldn't figure it out without Lebron. Cavs maxed out as #3 offense despite having a bunch of elite offensive talent. That team did not maximize Kevin Love.
70sFan
RealGM
Posts: 30,164
And1: 25,434
Joined: Aug 11, 2015
 

Re: Poll: Public sees MJ as GOAT 

Post#243 » by 70sFan » Sat Feb 18, 2023 7:10 am

VanWest82 wrote:
70sFan wrote:
VanWest82 wrote:Seems like you're speculating wildly and foolishly, and you'd be wrong.

Then what's your point? Love impact was maximized as a stretch big with passing skills. It made Cavs one of the best offensive teams in playoffs history. He didn't play like in Minny because he wasn't good enough to do that on top playoff offense with two elite ball-handlers. Love wouldn't average 25 ppg next to Jordan either.

His impact wasn't maximized. As with all Lebron teams, the offense fell apart as soon as Lebron sat. Cavs didn't run an offense other than Lebron ball. It never made any sense that Kyrie and Love, JR, Frye, RJ, etc. couldn't figure it out without Lebron. Cavs maxed out as #3 offense despite having a bunch of elite offensive talent. That team did not maximize Kevin Love.

How would you maximize it?
How would you define "LeBron ball"?
What would you change in Cavs offense to be better?
Why do these Cavs teams were so absurdly good offensively in the playoffs?
Taj FTW
Starter
Posts: 2,060
And1: 2,851
Joined: Oct 28, 2022

Re: Poll: Public sees MJ as GOAT 

Post#244 » by Taj FTW » Sat Feb 18, 2023 7:17 am

MavsDirk41 wrote:
Taj FTW wrote:
MavsDirk41 wrote:
They had played together for multiple seasons and won 3 championships together. They ran the triangle offense. Same coaching staff. Its called consistency. They were a well oiled machine. Besides, what was their record when Jordan came back in 95 to play the last 16 games of the season. Off the top of my head they were around .500.

James dominates the ball like Harden, Westbrook, and Luka. Everybody else stands around and watches what they do. The triangle offense involves everybody. Not just one guy pounding the ball for 20 seconds.

How about this. Miami lost the finals in 2011 cause James was mediocre. Wade outplayed him. Even when losing to Birds Celtics and The Pistons Jordan still played well. Name a time when Jordan no showed in a playoff series. Name a series when he was outplayed by another player on his team.

The supporting staff wasn't good, but they had a great record and almost won as many games without Jordan because the triangle and consistency? LOL! Teams don't just win 55 games out of nowhere. It's the NBA - you don't luck into good records. That obviously shows that the team was talented. That supporting cast was obviously great. They are what their record showed. It's OK to admit it.

Using a single series to make your point isn't very convincing. It's such a small sample size. When you make the playoffs as often as LeBron, you're bound to have a bad series sometime. I haven't looked it up, but I'd imagine LeBron has played around 3x as many playoff series as MJ. We're going to act like he can't have one bad series when's he's played in that many? LOL




Who said luck? Yea they were good but not “stacked” they won 3 championships together and had played mutilple seasons together. Did you watch those teams play in the 90s or just going off a basketball forum?

Its not just a bad series its the NBA finals. If you are talking about goat player, playing like that in the nba finals is a big deal. Its the biggest stage where goat level players should shine. The lights were too bright for him. Its ok to admit it. But dont act like the finals is the same as playing bad in a playoff series. Come on.

Did Jordan ever collude with other all star players? Nah, i dont think he did.

:lol: :lol: :lol:
VanWest82
RealGM
Posts: 19,589
And1: 18,107
Joined: Dec 05, 2008

Re: Poll: Public sees MJ as GOAT 

Post#245 » by VanWest82 » Sat Feb 18, 2023 7:25 am

70sFan wrote:How would you maximize it?

They needed to install an offense beyond just Lebron is the PG and coach on the floor. They had one attempt at the beginning in 2014 and botched it by basically letting Kyrie pretend to be PG.
How would you define "LeBron ball"?

See above. Lebron is both the PG and coach on the floor such that the team is left with no real base offense to work with when he isn't out there.
What would you change in Cavs offense to be better?

I'd have run more actions with Love from the pinch post. He was pretty good there in Minny but Lebron liked those spots too. The big tell for me was the lack of chemistry between Love and Kyrie. Cavs did a bad job of that. There's zero reason those guys shouldn't have figured that out.
Why do these Cavs teams were so absurdly good offensively in the playoffs?

Because Lebron decided to be the best player in the world and because the East SUUUUUCKED.
michaelm
RealGM
Posts: 12,169
And1: 5,219
Joined: Apr 06, 2010
 

Re: Poll: Public sees MJ as GOAT 

Post#246 » by michaelm » Sat Feb 18, 2023 8:25 am

Cavsfansince84 wrote:
michaelm wrote:I don't think Curry or KD is better than Lebron, and have not much interest in yet another Lebron vs MJ thread, but chanced upon your post were you posit KD and/or GSW stacked their team as opposed to Lebron, the biggest stacker of them all. He was perfectly entitled to do so with the Heatles and on his return to the Cavs imo , but as I said and you appear to have ignored it is the calling out of KD and to a lesser extent GSW for team stacking by Lebron fans in particular to which I object/find hypocritical. LeBron wanted to break the NBA with the Heatles and told the world this was his aim, which apparently should now be regarded as hyperbole, GSW told KD they could break the NBA with him and did so for one season at least, when that team was well in contention for being the best of all time. Why on earth shouldn't they have constructed the best team of all time if they could ?. o


Nope, that's not what I said and I don't think you really looked at the comment I quoted as a response to either(which I pointed out to you above). The other poster had said that Steph and a few others never needed to stack the deck the way LeBron did. I simply pointed out that they did just that by adding the 3rd best player to a team that had almost just won b2b titles. I didn't say anything about LeBron never stacking teams but as I also said, if the teams that LeBron were so stacked it never really materialized in the regular season. Maybe, just maybe its because his teams weren't nearly as stacked as people want to act like they were. Its one thing to say a guy like Love or Bosh was so great in a vacuum and its another to actually build a team from the ground up. More so when they aren't being asked to just put up box score numbers and being asked more to do things like play defense and fit in.

Dude yourself.

I made a very simple point, imo it does not behove Lebron fans to talk about other players or teams stacking their teams, unless it is in regard to the Celtics big 3 perhaps. Compared to any other team or player contemporary with him he stacked first and stacked more often and if he wasn't particularly good at doing so that is a problem for him and his fans but for nobody else.
70sFan
RealGM
Posts: 30,164
And1: 25,434
Joined: Aug 11, 2015
 

Re: Poll: Public sees MJ as GOAT 

Post#247 » by 70sFan » Sat Feb 18, 2023 8:37 am

VanWest82 wrote:They needed to install an offense beyond just Lebron is the PG and coach on the floor. They had one attempt at the beginning in 2014 and botched it by basically letting Kyrie pretend to be PG.

So they shouldn't run their offense through their best playmaker? That's your solution?

Kyrie had the ball just fine, LeBron wasn't ball-dominant for an on-ball creator. We have stats tracking things like time with ball or number of touches, LeBron was never among the most ball dominant players in the league.

About coaching - isn't that a criticism of James coaches, not himself?

See above. Lebron is both the PG and coach on the floor such that the team is left with no real base offense to work with when he isn't out there.

Again, isn't that a coach issue? How is LeBron his coach on the floor?

James didn't have any issues with being coached by Spolstra in Miami.

I'd have run more actions with Love from the pinch post. He was pretty good there in Minny but Lebron liked those spots too.

Love averaged around 3 post up FGA per game in 2016 and 2017 seasons, but he didn't do a good job on them. 3 FGA may sound low, but it's among top 20 highest in the league.

The big tell for me was the lack of chemistry between Love and Kyrie. Cavs did a bad job of that. There's zero reason those guys shouldn't have figured that out.

I think it shows limitations Kyrie has as a player. He showed that he can't be consistent creator as the main guy in other teams. I agree it should work better, but again I see no reason to show it as LeBron weakness.

Because Lebron decided to be the best player in the world and because the East SUUUUUCKED.

Numbers adjusted for opponents still show them as top tier historically.
Bel
Sophomore
Posts: 246
And1: 533
Joined: Jan 24, 2019
 

Re: Poll: Public sees MJ as GOAT 

Post#248 » by Bel » Sat Feb 18, 2023 8:56 am

70sFan wrote:
VanWest82 wrote:
70sFan wrote:Then what's your point? Love impact was maximized as a stretch big with passing skills. It made Cavs one of the best offensive teams in playoffs history. He didn't play like in Minny because he wasn't good enough to do that on top playoff offense with two elite ball-handlers. Love wouldn't average 25 ppg next to Jordan either.

His impact wasn't maximized. As with all Lebron teams, the offense fell apart as soon as Lebron sat. Cavs didn't run an offense other than Lebron ball. It never made any sense that Kyrie and Love, JR, Frye, RJ, etc. couldn't figure it out without Lebron. Cavs maxed out as #3 offense despite having a bunch of elite offensive talent. That team did not maximize Kevin Love.

How would you maximize it?
How would you define "LeBron ball"?
What would you change in Cavs offense to be better?
Why do these Cavs teams were so absurdly good offensively in the playoffs?


These should be obvious once you look beyond #stats.

Larry Bird played with great and bad teammates, but none ever sacrificed themselves to play for him. Nobody ever has to give excuses as to why Robert Parrish or Dennis Johnson had to lose their impact because they were 3rd options. Magic played with Kareem, Wilkes, Nixon, and Kareem, Worthy: nobody ever says that these guys took a hit to their output because they were the third or fourth option. Tim Duncan sacrificed his stats to allow his teammates the space to flourish instead of having Parker, Kawhi, and Manu stand out on the 3 point line to maximize his stats. 2020 was the only time Lebron seemed to allow his teammates to somewhat flourish, so it's a real shame he didn't do this any other time.

Lebron ball maximizes the stars stats at the expense of his teammates. Just like Harden ball, Luka ball, Curry ball before Steve Kerr, etc. That's the exact opposite of the Jordan-Jackson, Duncan-Poppovich, and Curry-Kerr teams that could win with way less talent: they made the superstar sacrifice because they had the capability to thrive in adverse situations, and their teammates didn't. So everyone's ability was maximized and the star picked up the slack. It made their teammates look better than they actually were, so the star looks like he's playing with great teammates, which hurts the analytics narrative. Even if their systems were discarded due to ego, Ricky Rubio already showed the blueprint to maximize Love's impact, as limited of a player as Rubio was. Lebron could also merge his 2020 setup and playmaking like Rubio with a strong focus on defense. Lebron + Love should be a dream pairing, Irving picks up the slack, and Love scoring 30 on better efficiency, and the Cavs having better defense. But doing so would cost Lebron easy stats, and that is evidently never acceptable. Same story throughout his career. Bosh, Wade have to sacrifice themselves for Lebron.

Duh those Cav teams were absurdly good on offense, that's all they were aiming for. Lebron was slacking on D to maximize his focus on offense, plus both Love and (to a lesser degree) Kyrie are offense only players. You have a top 5-10 guy in Love who carried a bottom 2 team without him to 9th in the league, and a top 10-15 guy in Love, plus one of the greatest ever. Love was 29 and Kyrie was 25. That's already one of the most talent-stacked teams of all time with how they traded that amazing set of assets for win-now players, and probably the most one-dimensional. They failed to realize their talent, simple as that. The expectations should have been 67-70 win 'fo fo fo' and at least beat the Warriors a few games better than the Spurs did pre-Zaza.

As for the topic, Bill Russell became a better leader faster than Jordan and won as a player-coach. But TV networks don't make money by hyping up Bill Russell so nobody will talk about him. Whoever they replace Lebron with will inevitably be the new Jordan comparison in however many years.
OhayoKD
Head Coach
Posts: 6,042
And1: 3,933
Joined: Jun 22, 2022

Re: Poll: Public sees MJ as GOAT 

Post#249 » by OhayoKD » Sat Feb 18, 2023 9:06 am

OldSchoolNoBull wrote:
OhayoKD wrote:It seems I've been summoned! :o


Man, I appreciate the time and effort you guys put into all this stuff, I really do, but sometimes I see things just make me question whether I can trust any of it. In one of the threads you linked above, I saw this statement:

Impact stuff looks at how MJ's presence correlates with the Bulls' defense getting better or worse and concludes that Jordan isn't on par(or paticularly close) to even second tier defenders like Kareem, Kawhi, Lebron, and Pippen.


Put aside the conclusion about MJ stated there. T[his sentence states that these impact metrics(it didn't state specifically which metrics) conclude that Scottie Pippen - universally regarded as one of the greatest perimeter defenders ever - is a second tier defende[/u]r. You argue in that same paragraph that box stats grading Bill Russell out as a role player should be a red flag, but can you see why something like this might be a red flag the other way? I'd love to know exactly what numbers are being referred to with the Pippen thing.

The key here is "perimeter". Pippen is maybe the best wing defender ever, but whether we look at who led the best defenses ever, adjusted impact data(RAPM), stabilized adjusted impact data(LEBRON, RPM, note these don't really exist beyond box pre 1997 tho), or "pure"/"raw" stuff(what happens when a player leaves or joins, net rating, on/off, ect, ect), all-time wings do not come particularly close to all-time bigs.

Russell leaves, the greatest defense ever becomes bad. Even if we give Pippen all the credit for the Bulls defensive improvement, he's turning an average defense into a defense that isn't nearly as good as Russell's. Giannis's bucks were the best defense in the league(19-20) without the second best defender. And when wings approach big-man impact, it's by imitating the paint protection of a big vs a favorable matchup(Lebron vs small-ball warriors for example)

Pippen is a tier 1 perimeter defender. But overall, I'm reserving tier 1 for the Hakeem's, Duncan's, KG's, Giannis's, ect. Even a second tier defensive big like Kareem is juicing his defenses by 4 points from 70-74.
OhayoKD
Head Coach
Posts: 6,042
And1: 3,933
Joined: Jun 22, 2022

Re: Poll: Public sees MJ as GOAT 

Post#250 » by OhayoKD » Sat Feb 18, 2023 9:10 am

70sFan wrote:
twyzted wrote:The PC is notorious for being pro Lebron.

Top post there now: What impact metric show Jordan as GOAT?
Op being: Do any?
And there are actually people there trying to argue for it. :lol:

I mean i have Jordan as #1 but i would never try and argue that Lebron has no stats that show him as #1

I mean, is it better to just stop asking questions? Is such question forbidden or what? If the answer is obvious, then answer it and everyone will be fine.

It's shocking to me that people think it's worse to ask what makes Jordan GOAT than accepting "Jordan = GOAT" opinion with no argumentation.

Well the answer right now seems to be that if you take data where Lebron's best 8-year stretch(consecutive, mind you) is higher than Jordan's 1-year peak(RAPM), and then chuck enough of the best years, Jordan's average is comparable. :lol:

And also accusing a person of lying, after
A. Providing inaccurate data
B. Lying about what that person despite them being kind enough to correct your inaccurate data
User avatar
AdagioPace
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,876
And1: 7,424
Joined: Jan 03, 2017
Location: Contado di Molise
   

Re: Poll: Public sees MJ as GOAT 

Post#251 » by AdagioPace » Sat Feb 18, 2023 9:30 am

MJ has been able to sell himself for decades. His marketing aura contributes to the goat status even if he's not better than Lebron.
"La natura gode della natura; la natura trionfa sulla natura; la natura domina la natura" - Ostanes
OhayoKD
Head Coach
Posts: 6,042
And1: 3,933
Joined: Jun 22, 2022

Re: Poll: Public sees MJ as GOAT 

Post#252 » by OhayoKD » Sat Feb 18, 2023 9:38 am

MavsDirk41 wrote:
OhayoKD wrote:It seems I've been summoned! :o
twyzted wrote: that ohayokd seems to have some weird issue with Jordan and since the numbers he refrences are locked behind a paywall i take them with a grain of salt, i want to be able to see them myself.

Unless I'm missing something, all the numbers I referenced are publicly available.

As Enig outlined, the bballref stats(which do the worst job predicting winning for fwiw) lean MJ in the rs and favor Lebron in the playoffs. And far as data goes, that's about the best it gets for his airness.
Salieri wrote:This is funny, because in the PC board there are a bunch of posters who have LeBron higher than MJ in their GOAT lists, and from their arguments you can see their IQ is above 80. In fact, their arguments are galaxies better than the ones wielded here, such as rings and threepeats (team accomplishments, not dependant on the player), or amount of shoes sold (LOL).

:love:
MavsDirk41 wrote:And im not sure what advanced arguments there are for lebron james that you are talking about. I really dont get your point.

Gusto1903 wrote:Theres not a single argument, other than longevity and versatility. And those dont even equal "better". Now his Point Total has come up, but that only underlines the longevity argument.

Here are some places to start(some stuff from me, some stuff from much smarter "others" :D ):

Peak/Prime statistical summary
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?p=101574289#p101574289
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?p=104201725#p104201725(box-only)
Impact vs Box
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?p=103103056#p103103056
Peak/Prime Impact
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?p=103585765#p103585765
Intangibles
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?f=64&t=2257921&p=104338060#p104338060
Defense/Portability/Impact
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?p=102650443#p102650443
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?p=104342431#p104342431
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?p=103591642#p103591642
Ceiling Raising
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?p=104170483#p104170483
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?p=104248279#p104248279
Era-Translation
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?p=102962677#p102962677(passing only)
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?p=102784921#p102784921(mj today)
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?p=102812530#p102812530(LBJ in the 80's/90's)

TLDR: Lebron is flatly a significantly more impactful defender(as in he's more valuable in the rs in his 30's before major playoff elevation), matches Jordan in the box-stuff(despite it not accounting for defense), has an overwhelming advantage when we isolate for winning/impact(this stuff accounts for defense), remains as or more valuable in contexts which are theoretically sub-optimal(2005-2007, 2015, 2012, 2020), and is managing all this facing a more talented league/larger talent pool.

If you hone in on his second cleveland stint(where he still looks more valuable in the regular season), Lebron also sports a pretty big resiliency advantage seeing his defenses and offenses improve when they face better competition with his scoring/playmaking volume and efficiency effectively impervious against top defenses/offenses(including the warriors).

Lebron sees his stuff go up as a series progresses(Jordan's stats drop across the board), and Lebron is able to mantain his stronger regular season and postseason influence despite having significantly more milage.

All considered, I'd say there's a plethora of strong peak/prime based arguments to work with here covering everything from resume to well, you know, helping teams win. In fact, there are solid arguments for various players, even if we hone in on "peak/prime"(Russell and Kareem chief among them).

PS: The PC Board is fun. You should come down more often. :D



How about this? I watched both careers live, im 47. I dont need to look at metrics or any of the other stuff you are putting out there. James is top 3 for me and Jordan is the goat. I can list my reasons if you want but i developed my opinion the old fashoined way - i watched hundreds of games to come to my conclusion

Go for it.
JN61
RealGM
Posts: 11,722
And1: 9,243
Joined: Jan 07, 2018
 

Re: Poll: Public sees MJ as GOAT 

Post#253 » by JN61 » Sat Feb 18, 2023 11:04 am

70sFan wrote:
VanWest82 wrote:
70sFan wrote:Love and LeBron pairing was absurdly good on the court. It seems that you care more about Love scoring more points than giving Cavs actual results.

Seems like you're speculating wildly and foolishly, and you'd be wrong.

Then what's your point? Love impact was maximized as a stretch big with passing skills. It made Cavs one of the best offensive teams in playoffs history. He didn't play like in Minny because he wasn't good enough to do that on top playoff offense with two elite ball-handlers. Love wouldn't average 25 ppg next to Jordan either.

Edit: just saw your edit. Cavs tried to give Love the bigger role many times in 2018 playoffs. Love didn't operate as the floor spacer during that run and he even got his chances in the post. He was just horrible in that run.

Love would absolutely average 25ppg next to Jordan. During his 26 ppg seasons love averaged 18 FGA and Pippen averaged close to 17 several times. Considering Loves scoring is more valuable than his playmakingand losing of Pippens playmaking Jordan would have larger playmaking role and Love would still score that 24-26 ppg depending on the season.
Pennebaker wrote:And Bird did it while being a defensive liability. But he also made All-Defensive teams, which was another controversial issue regarding Bird and votes.
MavsDirk41
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,760
And1: 4,470
Joined: Dec 07, 2022
     

Re: Poll: Public sees MJ as GOAT 

Post#254 » by MavsDirk41 » Sat Feb 18, 2023 3:31 pm

Taj FTW wrote:
MavsDirk41 wrote:
Taj FTW wrote:The supporting staff wasn't good, but they had a great record and almost won as many games without Jordan because the triangle and consistency? LOL! Teams don't just win 55 games out of nowhere. It's the NBA - you don't luck into good records. That obviously shows that the team was talented. That supporting cast was obviously great. They are what their record showed. It's OK to admit it.

Using a single series to make your point isn't very convincing. It's such a small sample size. When you make the playoffs as often as LeBron, you're bound to have a bad series sometime. I haven't looked it up, but I'd imagine LeBron has played around 3x as many playoff series as MJ. We're going to act like he can't have one bad series when's he's played in that many? LOL




Who said luck? Yea they were good but not “stacked” they won 3 championships together and had played mutilple seasons together. Did you watch those teams play in the 90s or just going off a basketball forum?

Its not just a bad series its the NBA finals. If you are talking about goat player, playing like that in the nba finals is a big deal. Its the biggest stage where goat level players should shine. The lights were too bright for him. Its ok to admit it. But dont act like the finals is the same as playing bad in a playoff series. Come on.

Did Jordan ever collude with other all star players? Nah, i dont think he did.

:lol: :lol: :lol:




Waiting for your reply on that
MavsDirk41
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,760
And1: 4,470
Joined: Dec 07, 2022
     

Re: Poll: Public sees MJ as GOAT 

Post#255 » by MavsDirk41 » Sat Feb 18, 2023 3:53 pm

OhayoKD wrote:
MavsDirk41 wrote:
OhayoKD wrote:It seems I've been summoned! :o

Unless I'm missing something, all the numbers I referenced are publicly available.

As Enig outlined, the bballref stats(which do the worst job predicting winning for fwiw) lean MJ in the rs and favor Lebron in the playoffs. And far as data goes, that's about the best it gets for his airness.

:love:


Here are some places to start(some stuff from me, some stuff from much smarter "others" :D ):

Peak/Prime statistical summary
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?p=101574289#p101574289
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?p=104201725#p104201725(box-only)
Impact vs Box
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?p=103103056#p103103056
Peak/Prime Impact
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?p=103585765#p103585765
Intangibles
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?f=64&t=2257921&p=104338060#p104338060
Defense/Portability/Impact
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?p=102650443#p102650443
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?p=104342431#p104342431
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?p=103591642#p103591642
Ceiling Raising
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?p=104170483#p104170483
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?p=104248279#p104248279
Era-Translation
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?p=102962677#p102962677(passing only)
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?p=102784921#p102784921(mj today)
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?p=102812530#p102812530(LBJ in the 80's/90's)

TLDR: Lebron is flatly a significantly more impactful defender(as in he's more valuable in the rs in his 30's before major playoff elevation), matches Jordan in the box-stuff(despite it not accounting for defense), has an overwhelming advantage when we isolate for winning/impact(this stuff accounts for defense), remains as or more valuable in contexts which are theoretically sub-optimal(2005-2007, 2015, 2012, 2020), and is managing all this facing a more talented league/larger talent pool.

If you hone in on his second cleveland stint(where he still looks more valuable in the regular season), Lebron also sports a pretty big resiliency advantage seeing his defenses and offenses improve when they face better competition with his scoring/playmaking volume and efficiency effectively impervious against top defenses/offenses(including the warriors).

Lebron sees his stuff go up as a series progresses(Jordan's stats drop across the board), and Lebron is able to mantain his stronger regular season and postseason influence despite having significantly more milage.

All considered, I'd say there's a plethora of strong peak/prime based arguments to work with here covering everything from resume to well, you know, helping teams win. In fact, there are solid arguments for various players, even if we hone in on "peak/prime"(Russell and Kareem chief among them).

PS: The PC Board is fun. You should come down more often. :D



How about this? I watched both careers live, im 47. I dont need to look at metrics or any of the other stuff you are putting out there. James is top 3 for me and Jordan is the goat. I can list my reasons if you want but i developed my opinion the old fashoined way - i watched hundreds of games to come to my conclusion

Go for it.



Offense - Jordan was better offensively. Better post game, better mid range, better free throw shooter by a wide margin. Highest regular season scoring avg (30.1) and highest playoff scoring avg (41 ppg), 10 scoring titles to 1 for James. James is a slightly better 3 point shooter career wise but not by much (about a pct point)

Rebounder and passer - both are great but James is better

Defense - Jordan won a defensive player of the year and 9 all nba defense selections. James has 6 alltime defense selections. Jordan led the league in scoring 3 years. Old Jordan was a better more consistent defender than James. James hasnt given much effort defensively in years because he puts his energy into the offensive side of the ball. Wizards Jordan still played defense.

Clutch - Jordan was more clutch. Just the way it is.

Winning - Jordan has more championships and more league mvps in fewer years. In fact Jordan only played 13 years in the nba. He missed one year basically to injury and came back in March out of retirememt one year.

Jordan stayed with the Bulls and won 6 championships with the team that drafted him. He had to wait 3 years for Pippen to develop. Second 3 peat he won with an aging and injured Pippen (98) and Rodman who nobody else wanted. James has colluded with other allstars and formed superteams the last 13 years. He has a 4-6 finals record and was outplayed by a lesser opponent (Dirk) and wasnt even the best player on the 2011 finals team that year. Jordan never no showed in a finals like that. James has also been swept in the finals twice and his team
was demolished in 2014 finals.

My opinion. Everybody has a right to their opinion. You asked for mine so i shared.
MavsDirk41
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,760
And1: 4,470
Joined: Dec 07, 2022
     

Re: Poll: Public sees MJ as GOAT 

Post#256 » by MavsDirk41 » Sat Feb 18, 2023 3:55 pm

OhayoKD wrote:
MavsDirk41 wrote:
OhayoKD wrote:It seems I've been summoned! :o

Unless I'm missing something, all the numbers I referenced are publicly available.

As Enig outlined, the bballref stats(which do the worst job predicting winning for fwiw) lean MJ in the rs and favor Lebron in the playoffs. And far as data goes, that's about the best it gets for his airness.

:love:


Here are some places to start(some stuff from me, some stuff from much smarter "others" :D ):

Peak/Prime statistical summary
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?p=101574289#p101574289
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?p=104201725#p104201725(box-only)
Impact vs Box
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?p=103103056#p103103056
Peak/Prime Impact
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?p=103585765#p103585765
Intangibles
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?f=64&t=2257921&p=104338060#p104338060
Defense/Portability/Impact
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?p=102650443#p102650443
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?p=104342431#p104342431
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?p=103591642#p103591642
Ceiling Raising
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?p=104170483#p104170483
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?p=104248279#p104248279
Era-Translation
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?p=102962677#p102962677(passing only)
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?p=102784921#p102784921(mj today)
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?p=102812530#p102812530(LBJ in the 80's/90's)

TLDR: Lebron is flatly a significantly more impactful defender(as in he's more valuable in the rs in his 30's before major playoff elevation), matches Jordan in the box-stuff(despite it not accounting for defense), has an overwhelming advantage when we isolate for winning/impact(this stuff accounts for defense), remains as or more valuable in contexts which are theoretically sub-optimal(2005-2007, 2015, 2012, 2020), and is managing all this facing a more talented league/larger talent pool.

If you hone in on his second cleveland stint(where he still looks more valuable in the regular season), Lebron also sports a pretty big resiliency advantage seeing his defenses and offenses improve when they face better competition with his scoring/playmaking volume and efficiency effectively impervious against top defenses/offenses(including the warriors).

Lebron sees his stuff go up as a series progresses(Jordan's stats drop across the board), and Lebron is able to mantain his stronger regular season and postseason influence despite having significantly more milage.

All considered, I'd say there's a plethora of strong peak/prime based arguments to work with here covering everything from resume to well, you know, helping teams win. In fact, there are solid arguments for various players, even if we hone in on "peak/prime"(Russell and Kareem chief among them).

PS: The PC Board is fun. You should come down more often. :D



How about this? I watched both careers live, im 47. I dont need to look at metrics or any of the other stuff you are putting out there. James is top 3 for me and Jordan is the goat. I can list my reasons if you want but i developed my opinion the old fashoined way - i watched hundreds of games to come to my conclusion

Go for it.


Sorry - led the league in steals 3 years
Taj FTW
Starter
Posts: 2,060
And1: 2,851
Joined: Oct 28, 2022

Re: Poll: Public sees MJ as GOAT 

Post#257 » by Taj FTW » Sat Feb 18, 2023 5:53 pm

MavsDirk41 wrote:
OhayoKD wrote:
MavsDirk41 wrote:

How about this? I watched both careers live, im 47. I dont need to look at metrics or any of the other stuff you are putting out there. James is top 3 for me and Jordan is the goat. I can list my reasons if you want but i developed my opinion the old fashoined way - i watched hundreds of games to come to my conclusion

Go for it.


Sorry - led the league in steals 3 years

LMAO! You know who also lead the league in steals for 3 years? Allen Iverson. He must be a top tier defender.

I thought people only used steals to judge defensive prowess as a joke now a days? Is that what you were doing?
70sFan
RealGM
Posts: 30,164
And1: 25,434
Joined: Aug 11, 2015
 

Re: Poll: Public sees MJ as GOAT 

Post#258 » by 70sFan » Sat Feb 18, 2023 5:57 pm

JN61 wrote:
70sFan wrote:
VanWest82 wrote:Seems like you're speculating wildly and foolishly, and you'd be wrong.

Then what's your point? Love impact was maximized as a stretch big with passing skills. It made Cavs one of the best offensive teams in playoffs history. He didn't play like in Minny because he wasn't good enough to do that on top playoff offense with two elite ball-handlers. Love wouldn't average 25 ppg next to Jordan either.

Edit: just saw your edit. Cavs tried to give Love the bigger role many times in 2018 playoffs. Love didn't operate as the floor spacer during that run and he even got his chances in the post. He was just horrible in that run.

Love would absolutely average 25ppg next to Jordan. During his 26 ppg seasons love averaged 18 FGA and Pippen averaged close to 17 several times. Considering Loves scoring is more valuable than his playmakingand losing of Pippens playmaking Jordan would have larger playmaking role and Love would still score that 24-26 ppg depending on the season.

Nice try, but you are wrong. Let's compare 2014 Love vs 2017 Love field goal attempts and true shooting attempts per 75 possessions to Pippen seasons with highest volume next to Jordan:

2014 Love: 18.5 FGA, 22.5 TSA per75

2017 Love: 14.5 FGA, 19.8 TSA per75

1997 Pippen: 16.7 FGA, 19.3 TSA per75
1992 Pippen: 16.6 FGA, 18.7 TSA per75
1996 Pippen: 15.8 FGA, 19.0 TSA per75


Pippen never approached Love volume next to Jordan. Love in 2017 scored on higher volume than Pippen ever did with Jordan actually - he just played less minutes. Jordan never played with 25 ppg teammate, every star that joined Jordan had to adjust to his monstrous scoring volume. Love would be no different.

Interestingly, Pippen without Jordan:

1994 Pippen: 17.8 FGA, 20.7 TSA per75

Guess what - Jordan reduced Pippen's scoring volume.
twyzted
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,880
And1: 2,208
Joined: Jun 01, 2018
     

Re: Poll: Public sees MJ as GOAT 

Post#259 » by twyzted » Sat Feb 18, 2023 7:18 pm

OhayoKD wrote:It seems I've been summoned! :o
twyzted wrote: that ohayokd seems to have some weird issue with Jordan and since the numbers he refrences are locked behind a paywall i take them with a grain of salt, i want to be able to see them myself.

Unless I'm missing something, all the numbers I referenced are publicly available.

As Enig outlined, the bballref stats(which do the worst job predicting winning for fwiw) lean MJ in the rs and favor Lebron in the playoffs. And far as data goes, that's about the best it gets for his airness.


No bbref stats all point in favour of Jordan in non-cumolative stats. Adv or reg stats

Spoiler:
OhayoKD wrote:
Salieri wrote:This is funny, because in the PC board there are a bunch of posters who have LeBron higher than MJ in their GOAT lists, and from their arguments you can see their IQ is above 80. In fact, their arguments are galaxies better than the ones wielded here, such as rings and threepeats (team accomplishments, not dependant on the player), or amount of shoes sold (LOL).

:love:
MavsDirk41 wrote:And im not sure what advanced arguments there are for lebron james that you are talking about. I really dont get your point.

Gusto1903 wrote:Theres not a single argument, other than longevity and versatility. And those dont even equal "better". Now his Point Total has come up, but that only underlines the longevity argument.

Here are some places to start(some stuff from me, some stuff from much smarter "others" :D ):

Peak/Prime statistical summary
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?p=101574289#p101574289
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?p=104201725#p104201725(box-only)
Impact vs Box
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?p=103103056#p103103056
Peak/Prime Impact
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?p=103585765#p103585765
Intangibles
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?f=64&t=2257921&p=104338060#p104338060
Defense/Portability/Impact
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?p=102650443#p102650443
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?p=104342431#p104342431
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?p=103591642#p103591642
Ceiling Raising
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?p=104170483#p104170483
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?p=104248279#p104248279
Era-Translation
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?p=102962677#p102962677(passing only)
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?p=102784921#p102784921(mj today)
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?p=102812530#p102812530(LBJ in the 80's/90's)


OhayoKD wrote:Since mj-topics tend to boil over, i'd like to preface this with a request that we all try our best to be nice to each other :D

Now, to jump into the deep end...
opofsaidthreaf wrote:Do any?

My short answer is no. But getting to that short answer is a more involved process.


Sorry this answer makes me take EVERYTHING you say about Jordan as bs and needs no further reading.

OhayoKD wrote:TLDR: Lebron is flatly a significantly more impactful defender(as in he's more valuable in the rs in his 30's before major playoff elevation), matches Jordan in the box-stuff(despite it not accounting for defense), has an overwhelming advantage when we isolate for winning/impact(this stuff accounts for defense), remains as or more valuable in contexts which are theoretically sub-optimal(2005-2007, 2015, 2012, 2020), and is managing all this facing a more talented league/larger talent pool.

If you hone in on his second cleveland stint(where he still looks more valuable in the regular season), Lebron also sports a pretty big resiliency advantage seeing his defenses and offenses improve when they face better competition with his scoring/playmaking volume and efficiency effectively impervious against top defenses/offenses(including the warriors).


Right that is why in 2015 finals Lebron needed 32 shots per game to score 35ppg on 39.8fg%

And the east in the cavs stint is the weakest conference in quite long time.

2015 cavs cf: drtg 99.7 - ortg 114
2015 cavs finals: drtg 107.3 - ortg 99.6

2016 cavs cf: drtg 101.2 - ortg 118.5
2016 cavs finals: drtg 108.5 - ortg 109.1

2017cavs cf: drtg 107 - ortg 128.4
2017 cavs finals: drtg 121.3 - ortg 114.6

2018 cavs cf: drtg 105.5 - ortg 106.4
2018 cavs finals: drtg 124.5 - ortg 108.5

No defense does in fact not improve when facing better competition.

Offense in 1 year gets better.

When you say isolate for winning then winning the title surely must be significantly more valueble then not? You can hate the rings argument all you want but that is the whole goal of the competition.

f.i one of the argument people had for Messi not being the goat in soccer was he hadnt won with his national team.

P.s yes i know Russel has more rings, ive never said that he doesnt have a good case for goat or he might even be.

OhayoKD wrote: Lebron sees his stuff go up as a series progresses(Jordan's stats drop across the board), and Lebron is able to mantain his stronger regular season and postseason influence despite having significantly more milage.

All considered, I'd say there's a plethora of strong peak/prime based arguments to work with here covering everything from resume to well, you know, helping teams win. In fact, there are solid arguments for various players, even if we hone in on "peak/prime"(Russell and Kareem chief among them).

PS: The PC Board is fun. You should come down more often. :D


On what are you basing this Jordan stats go down as series goes on? The Seattle series? That is the only series where his stats dip as the series goes on.

Utah finals 97
Games 1-4 series tied 2-2
46%fg 31%3pt 73%ft 6rpg 7apg 1spg 1bpg 29ppg
Games 5-6 closes out the series
45%fg 33%3pt 82%fr 9rpg 5apg 2spg 1bpg 39ppg

Utah finals 98
Games 1-3
45%fg 25%3pt 86%ft 4rpg 2apg 1spg 1bpg 31ppg
Games 3-6
41%fg 33%ft 78%ft 4rpg 2apg 3spg 36ppg
His fg&ft% goes down but scores more.

No i have zero interest in go more often then i do in the Lebron board, since you guys have the tendency to resort to belittle and being rude to posters who argue against Lebron.

How ever there are some very good posters on the board but they are few.

I also have to admire the commitment you guys have to spend all this time trying to find any stat that shows that a guy who retired 20+ years ago isnt the GOAT, insted of letting Lebrons career achivement do it, shows me all i need to know on the debate.
VanWest82
RealGM
Posts: 19,589
And1: 18,107
Joined: Dec 05, 2008

Re: Poll: Public sees MJ as GOAT 

Post#260 » by VanWest82 » Sat Feb 18, 2023 7:54 pm

70sFan wrote:
VanWest82 wrote:They needed to install an offense beyond just Lebron is the PG and coach on the floor. They had one attempt at the beginning in 2014 and botched it by basically letting Kyrie pretend to be PG.

So they shouldn't run their offense through their best playmaker? That's your solution?

Of course Lebron should've had the ball the most and absolutely in the important spots, but I don't think he should've been allowed to dictate the offense to the degree that he did. He did accomodate Kyrie, i'll give him that.

Kyrie had the ball just fine, LeBron wasn't ball-dominant for an on-ball creator. We have stats tracking things like time with ball or number of touches, LeBron was never among the most ball dominant players in the league.

You're missing the point. I'm not accusing him of dribbling the air out of the ball. I'm saying the general lack of structure beyond Lebron making decisions for the team, orchestrating even when he didn't have the ball, was counter-productive when Lebron wasn't on the floor.

About coaching - isn't that a criticism of James coaches, not himself?

Yes, I would agree with this to an extent. I think Lebron makes it really difficult to disagree with him. Don't give him the leeway to play the way he wants? He's passive aggressive, takes a two week vacation, etc. Don't trade/sign for the guys he wants? He's passive aggressive, starts talking to media, etc. He signed one year deals every year his second stint. Don't do what he wants, he walks.

James didn't have any issues with being coached by Spolstra in Miami.

He absolutely did, though I thought Spo earned his respect eventually. I also don't think it's an accident that Lebron enjoyed the most success of his career playing in Miami. But even then, Heat changed their entire offense to be geared around Lebron in 2012 so it was still mostly about accomodating him as appose to finding ways to get the most out Wade or Bosh. It's always about everyone else having to change.

I'd have run more actions with Love from the pinch post. He was pretty good there in Minny but Lebron liked those spots too.

Love averaged around 3 post up FGA per game in 2016 and 2017 seasons, but he didn't do a good job on them. 3 FGA may sound low, but it's among top 20 highest in the league.

Not what I meant. I said run more actions. DHOs, Pin downs, flare screens, Pinch post with baseline cutters. Wolves ran so many actions with Love flaring out to the wing for a three or looking for cutters from the high post. He was a really good passer but he rarely had the ball for anything other than a shot with Cavs. Love the hub facilitator was a missed opportunity.

The big tell for me was the lack of chemistry between Love and Kyrie. Cavs did a bad job of that. There's zero reason those guys shouldn't have figured that out.

I think it shows limitations Kyrie has as a player. He showed that he can't be consistent creator as the main guy in other teams. I agree it should work better, but again I see no reason to show it as LeBron weakness.

The problem was Kyrie was empowered over Love because Love and Lebron wanted to operate in similar areas on the court. All the high post and pinch post stuff I discussed was earmarked for Lebron. Love was just a screener and C&S guy who Cavs ocassionally would run a PU for just so he could touch the ball. He was treated like a late 2000s big who you gave a token touch so he would stay involved defenisvely. Lebron wasn't willing to give up the areas of the floor Love needed to thrive. He'd put a ton of work into developing those parts of his game in Miami.

Because Lebron decided to be the best player in the world and because the East SUUUUUCKED.

Numbers adjusted for opponents still show them as top tier historically.

Lebron didn't have to face any real rim protection in that era so it's not a surprise his teams graded out well. Plus he's a great player. If you're referring to some of the analyses that have been done on the PC board, I disagree with the methodology (i.e. only looking at offense vs. defense relative ratings as appose to whole team). Basketball isn't played on one end only.

But the argument has always been that Lebron's teams never developed a way of playing without him that might have led to better success with him off the court or allowed him to focus more on defense where those Cavs teams were deficient. He only played one way, and would double down on that one way in the playoffs. His numbers looked great but his teams couldn't compete with the best competition even though similarly talented teams like the 2018 Rockets (say vs. 2017 Cavs) could.

Return to The General Board