NBA Finals: (2) Suns vs (3) Bucks, Part 1 | Suns lead 2-0

Moderators: bwgood77, bisme37, zimpy27, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, Domejandro, ken6199, infinite11285, Clav, Dirk

Who wins the 2021 NBA Finals

Suns in 4
27
6%
Suns in 5
58
13%
Suns in 6
131
30%
Suns in 7
42
10%
Bucks in 4
3
1%
Bucks in 5
10
2%
Bucks in 6
124
28%
Bucks in 7
43
10%
 
Total votes: 438

zshawn10
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,410
And1: 5,636
Joined: Jul 27, 2015
       

Re: NBA Finals: (2) Suns vs (3) Bucks, Part 1 | Series tied 0-0 

Post#301 » by zshawn10 » Tue Jul 6, 2021 5:08 pm

spanishninja wrote:
zshawn10 wrote:
Read on Twitter
?s=21

Read on Twitter


so who are we getting? Cassidy? Doris?


Malika Andrews
spanishninja
General Manager
Posts: 8,095
And1: 6,196
Joined: Jan 07, 2014
 

Re: NBA Finals: (2) Suns vs (3) Bucks, Part 1 | Series tied 0-0 

Post#302 » by spanishninja » Tue Jul 6, 2021 5:18 pm

zshawn10 wrote:
spanishninja wrote:
zshawn10 wrote:
Read on Twitter
?s=21

Read on Twitter


so who are we getting? Cassidy? Doris?


Malika Andrews


coo coo
User avatar
EArl
RealGM
Posts: 49,980
And1: 13,482
Joined: Mar 14, 2012
Location: Columbus
   

Re: NBA Finals: (2) Suns vs (3) Bucks, Part 1 | Series tied 0-0 

Post#303 » by EArl » Tue Jul 6, 2021 5:19 pm

Since I have no dog in this fight, I guess ill root for the underdogs. So go Bucks Go!
Deep into that darkness peering, long I stood there wondering, fearing, Doubting, dreaming dreams no mortal ever dared to dream before;
spanishninja
General Manager
Posts: 8,095
And1: 6,196
Joined: Jan 07, 2014
 

Re: NBA Finals: (2) Suns vs (3) Bucks, Part 1 | Series tied 0-0 

Post#304 » by spanishninja » Tue Jul 6, 2021 5:20 pm

zshawn10 wrote:
jsierra1985 wrote:I was 8 freaking years old when i watched the suns in the finals in 93'

I am F*CKING HYPED about all this.

I dont care about the road to the finals. Or injury talk blah blah....

SUNS 4 MORE EFFIN WINS!


Congrats; your team is a -195 series favorite in Vegas which is pretty big and the consensus is Suns in 5 or 6


eh, -195 is actually not a very strong favorite. 538 has us at 69% and that's partly based on Giannis' uncertainty. Depending on when he comes back things could easily change.
Wallace_Wallace
Head Coach
Posts: 6,115
And1: 7,418
Joined: Jul 28, 2017
       

Re: NBA Finals: (2) Suns vs (3) Bucks, Part 1 | Series tied 0-0 

Post#305 » by Wallace_Wallace » Tue Jul 6, 2021 5:26 pm

Whoever wins the first road game would win in 6.

I would like the Suns to win though!
User avatar
bwgood77
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 98,368
And1: 61,096
Joined: Feb 06, 2009
Location: Austin
Contact:
   

Re: NBA Finals: (2) Suns vs (3) Bucks, Part 1 | Series tied 0-0 

Post#306 » by bwgood77 » Tue Jul 6, 2021 5:26 pm

skones wrote:
bwgood77 wrote:
It's not like they got to play the Nets missing 2 superstars and playing like a 6 man rotation of mostly role players with KD and sometimes Harden who likely hurt the team when on the floor. They still had problems with them.



I'm not going to sit here and harp on injuries like others are, but if you're going to argue with these guys, don't drag the Bucks into it. You're right that you didn't get to play the Nets with KD and a bunch of roleplayers (even though Harden played 3 and Irving three and a half), instead you literally played the Clippers led by Paul George and a bunch of roleplayers. There's a gulf between the two even before you consider a second star actually played games. Don't be petty towards us to cover your team's ass. It's embarrassing.


I wouldn't have brought the Bucks into it if it wasn't a Bucks fan trolling the Suns that I was replying to. Harden was worthless going 1-10 in a game the Nets actually won and like 5-26 from 3 in the games he played including 2-22 in 2 of them. But aside from that their best player was Harris who went like 8-33 from 3 the last 5 games, under 25%, then outside of that they had a washed Griffin, Brown, and guys like Claxton and James off the bench.

Anyway, I wouldn't have brought that into it if the Bucks fan didn't start it and like I said in the rest of the post you cut out of your quote, they shouldn't apologize for beating up a team with multiple injured all All NBA caliber players either. That's the team that was put in front of them.
Hsker4Life
Rookie
Posts: 1,131
And1: 1,349
Joined: Jul 05, 2012
 

Re: NBA Finals: (2) Suns vs (3) Bucks, Part 1 | Series tied 0-0 

Post#307 » by Hsker4Life » Tue Jul 6, 2021 5:28 pm

skones wrote:
bwgood77 wrote:
It's not like they got to play the Nets missing 2 superstars and playing like a 6 man rotation of mostly role players with KD and sometimes Harden who likely hurt the team when on the floor. They still had problems with them.



I'm not going to sit here and harp on injuries like others are, but if you're going to argue with these guys, don't drag the Bucks into it. You're right that you didn't get to play the Nets with KD and a bunch of roleplayers (even though Harden played 3 and Irving three and a half), instead you literally played the Clippers led by Paul George and a bunch of roleplayers. There's a gulf between the two even before you consider a second star actually played games. Don't be petty towards us to cover your team's ass. It's embarrassing.

Settle down. The Bucks path was easier, still.

Heat, Nets, Hawks
skones
RealGM
Posts: 37,108
And1: 17,267
Joined: Jul 20, 2004

Re: NBA Finals: (2) Suns vs (3) Bucks, Part 1 | Series tied 0-0 

Post#308 » by skones » Tue Jul 6, 2021 5:30 pm

bwgood77 wrote:
skones wrote:
bwgood77 wrote:
It's not like they got to play the Nets missing 2 superstars and playing like a 6 man rotation of mostly role players with KD and sometimes Harden who likely hurt the team when on the floor. They still had problems with them.



I'm not going to sit here and harp on injuries like others are, but if you're going to argue with these guys, don't drag the Bucks into it. You're right that you didn't get to play the Nets with KD and a bunch of roleplayers (even though Harden played 3 and Irving three and a half), instead you literally played the Clippers led by Paul George and a bunch of roleplayers. There's a gulf between the two even before you consider a second star actually played games. Don't be petty towards us to cover your team's ass. It's embarrassing.


I wouldn't have brought the Bucks into it if it wasn't a Bucks fan trolling the Suns that I was replying to. Harden was worthless going 1-10 in a game the Nets actually won and like 5-26 from 3 in the games he played including 2-22 in 2 of them. But aside from that their best player was Harris who went like 8-33 from 3 the last 5 games, under 25%, then outside of that they had a washed Griffin, Brown, and guys like Claxton and James off the bench.

Anyway, I wouldn't have brought that into it if the Bucks fan didn't start it and like I said in the rest of the post you cut out of your quote, they shouldn't apologize for beating up a team with multiple injured all All NBA caliber players either. That's the team that was put in front of them.


Doranku's been around here since February 2020 and the first mention of the Bucks in his search history was May 5th. The Cleveland
skones
RealGM
Posts: 37,108
And1: 17,267
Joined: Jul 20, 2004

Re: NBA Finals: (2) Suns vs (3) Bucks, Part 1 | Series tied 0-0 

Post#309 » by skones » Tue Jul 6, 2021 5:33 pm

Hsker4Life wrote:Settle down. The Bucks path was easier, still.

Heat, Nets, Hawks


Do not tell me to settle down and then continue pushing that same narrative.
User avatar
bwgood77
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 98,368
And1: 61,096
Joined: Feb 06, 2009
Location: Austin
Contact:
   

Re: NBA Finals: (2) Suns vs (3) Bucks, Part 1 | Series tied 0-0 

Post#310 » by bwgood77 » Tue Jul 6, 2021 5:36 pm

skones wrote:
bwgood77 wrote:
skones wrote:
I'm not going to sit here and harp on injuries like others are, but if you're going to argue with these guys, don't drag the Bucks into it. You're right that you didn't get to play the Nets with KD and a bunch of roleplayers (even though Harden played 3 and Irving three and a half), instead you literally played the Clippers led by Paul George and a bunch of roleplayers. There's a gulf between the two even before you consider a second star actually played games. Don't be petty towards us to cover your team's ass. It's embarrassing.


I wouldn't have brought the Bucks into it if it wasn't a Bucks fan trolling the Suns that I was replying to. Harden was worthless going 1-10 in a game the Nets actually won and like 5-26 from 3 in the games he played including 2-22 in 2 of them. But aside from that their best player was Harris who went like 8-33 from 3 the last 5 games, under 25%, then outside of that they had a washed Griffin, Brown, and guys like Claxton and James off the bench.

Anyway, I wouldn't have brought that into it if the Bucks fan didn't start it and like I said in the rest of the post you cut out of your quote, they shouldn't apologize for beating up a team with multiple injured all All NBA caliber players either. That's the team that was put in front of them.


Doranku's been around here since February 2020 and the first mention of the Bucks in his search history was May 5th.


Well he has a Bucks logo and maybe didn't get hyped until the playoffs were close...I don't know and didn't research his post history...just noticed he was a Bucks fan according to the teams he lists as his favorites.
skones
RealGM
Posts: 37,108
And1: 17,267
Joined: Jul 20, 2004

Re: NBA Finals: (2) Suns vs (3) Bucks, Part 1 | Series tied 0-0 

Post#311 » by skones » Tue Jul 6, 2021 5:39 pm

bwgood77 wrote:
Well he has a Bucks logo and maybe didn't get hyped until the playoffs were close...I don't know and didn't research his post history...just noticed he was a Bucks fan according to the teams he lists as his favorites.


The Browns logo is about all you need to see to raise a red flag. But hey, as we all know, fans of teams say things like (on the GB, zero posts on our board) what's written below during the Brooklyn series.

Doranku wrote:Giannis is just so unskilled. Very difficult to root for


I'm going to hold you to a higher standard here given you're a global mod.
User avatar
Bruin
RealGM
Posts: 25,297
And1: 39,796
Joined: Mar 11, 2018
       

Re: NBA Finals: (2) Suns vs (3) Bucks, Part 1 | Series tied 0-0 

Post#312 » by Bruin » Tue Jul 6, 2021 5:45 pm

Read on Twitter
?s=21
Image
Hsker4Life
Rookie
Posts: 1,131
And1: 1,349
Joined: Jul 05, 2012
 

Re: NBA Finals: (2) Suns vs (3) Bucks, Part 1 | Series tied 0-0 

Post#313 » by Hsker4Life » Tue Jul 6, 2021 5:55 pm

skones wrote:
Hsker4Life wrote:Settle down. The Bucks path was easier, still.

Heat, Nets, Hawks


Do not tell me to settle down and then continue pushing that same narrative.

Settle down.

A Bucks fan was sarcastically trolling the Suns, and you got upset with a Suns fan pointing out the Bucks’ path. That makes no sense.

And yes, the Bucks have had the easier path to this point.
User avatar
bwgood77
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 98,368
And1: 61,096
Joined: Feb 06, 2009
Location: Austin
Contact:
   

Re: NBA Finals: (2) Suns vs (3) Bucks, Part 1 | Series tied 0-0 

Post#314 » by bwgood77 » Tue Jul 6, 2021 5:59 pm

skones wrote:
bwgood77 wrote:
Well he has a Bucks logo and maybe didn't get hyped until the playoffs were close...I don't know and didn't research his post history...just noticed he was a Bucks fan according to the teams he lists as his favorites.


The Browns logo is about all you need to see to raise a red flag. But hey, as we all know, fans of teams say things like (on the GB, zero posts on our board) what's written below during the Brooklyn series.

Doranku wrote:Giannis is just so unskilled. Very difficult to root for


I'm going to hold you to a higher standard here given you're a global mod.


There are tons of fans with logos of other NFL teams than their Suns one...heck, mine for example, having grown up a Chargers fan before the Cardinals were in AZ. I think most Suns fans are not even Cardinals fans..or maybe half.

In Milwaukee it might be different since it's not a huge transplant state and the Packers have been their forever.

Anyway, there are fans of a lot of teams that only post on the GB for whatever reason and after Feb 2020 there wasn't much to post about after the season stopped and then 4 1/2 months later the bubble started and the Bucks unfortunately were disappointing (and I was pulling for them). I've actually been pulling for them in the east this whole season.

Just found it odd that a Bucks logo guy is bashing the Suns for being forced to play teams with injuries when the same thing holds true for the team he has listed. Just a rebuttal and obviously something I wouldn't just bring up.
skones
RealGM
Posts: 37,108
And1: 17,267
Joined: Jul 20, 2004

Re: NBA Finals: (2) Suns vs (3) Bucks, Part 1 | Series tied 0-0 

Post#315 » by skones » Tue Jul 6, 2021 6:01 pm

Hsker4Life wrote:
skones wrote:
Hsker4Life wrote:Settle down. The Bucks path was easier, still.

Heat, Nets, Hawks


Do not tell me to settle down and then continue pushing that same narrative.

Settle down.

A Bucks fan was sarcastically trolling the Suns, and you got upset with a Suns fan pointing out the Bucks’ path. That makes no sense.

And yes, the Bucks have had the easier path to this point.


He is not a Bucks fan, as previously stated. Please follow along.

but k. cool. Our first round matchup featured a 6 seed (not a 7), a team that was in the finals last year, and they were completely healthy. We swept. You faced a battered 7 seed who made the finals and didn't. Kevin Durant was better than any player than you'd face throughout your path to the playoffs. In fact, I'll sit here and just say the Nets would have beaten Denver because we're just tossing around arbitrary things like "easier." Tell me how many times you didn't have home court advantage and had to go on the road, in a game 7, against two perennial MVP candidates and win in overtime. And then you faced noted playoff choker Paul George in the conference finals and STILL almost went down? And you're sitting there having the audacity to call anyone's path easier?

I can spin things too, so it's best you just give it up and don't.
Hsker4Life
Rookie
Posts: 1,131
And1: 1,349
Joined: Jul 05, 2012
 

Re: NBA Finals: (2) Suns vs (3) Bucks, Part 1 | Series tied 0-0 

Post#316 » by Hsker4Life » Tue Jul 6, 2021 6:14 pm

skones wrote:
Hsker4Life wrote:
skones wrote:
Do not tell me to settle down and then continue pushing that same narrative.

Settle down.

A Bucks fan was sarcastically trolling the Suns, and you got upset with a Suns fan pointing out the Bucks’ path. That makes no sense.

And yes, the Bucks have had the easier path to this point.


He is not a Bucks fan, as previously stated. Please follow along.

but k. cool. Our first round matchup featured a 6 seed (not a 7), a team that was in the finals last year, and they were completely healthy. We swept. You faced a battered 7 seed who made the finals and didn't. Kevin Durant was better than any player than you'd face throughout your path to the playoffs. In fact, I'll sit here and just say the Nets would have beaten Denver because we're just tossing around arbitrary things like "easier." Tell me how many times you didn't have home court advantage. And then you faced noted playoff choker Paul George in the conference finals and STILL almost went down? And you're sitting there having the audacity to call anyone's path easier?

I can spin things too, so it's best you just give it up and don't.


You’re reeling.

Lakers > Heat. That includes the Lakers without AD. And the Heat were not “completely healthy”. They traded Bradley and Olynyk for Oladipo. Did you forget that? Hint: Oladipo didn’t play in the playoffs.

Nets without Kyrie and Harden would beat the Nuggets without Murrey? It’s possible. But the Nuggets knew they would be without Murrey for a long time. They prepared for it.

And the Hawks? Without Trae Young? Without Deandre Hunter?

Any criticism you or anyone else supporting a Bucks avatar may give PHX for their path, that exact same criticism can be applied to Milwaukee’s path. I’m sorry that upsets you.
User avatar
Mrakar
Analyst
Posts: 3,112
And1: 3,929
Joined: Sep 01, 2010

Re: NBA Finals: (2) Suns vs (3) Bucks, Part 1 | Series tied 0-0 

Post#317 » by Mrakar » Tue Jul 6, 2021 6:18 pm

Its a 50-50 matchup, i don't think there are favourites even though i slightly lean on Bucks side(with healthy Giannis from at least G2) even though u root for Suns. They are big and very good on defense. It will be hard for CP3 and Booker to play against Holiday, i think especialy for CP3 because of the size, and he is not quick anymore to get pass people who are bigger than him. Anything can happen of course, we all know offensive struggles of Bucks lineup. Suns will need more from Booker in this series and of course a lot of will depend on role players 3pt shooting. I trust more Bridges/Crowder/Johnson than Tucker/Lopez/Connaughton but they are all streaky so who knows...
User avatar
homecourtloss
RealGM
Posts: 11,534
And1: 18,935
Joined: Dec 29, 2012

Re: NBA Finals: (2) Suns vs (3) Bucks, Part 1 | Series tied 0-0 

Post#318 » by homecourtloss » Tue Jul 6, 2021 6:18 pm

DCasey91 wrote:
skones wrote:
DCasey91 wrote:
Hawks play very small size wise. I just don’t think Lopez is a great rebounder that’s pretty much it.
We out rebounded them too, we just forgot that we were big lol

We’ll see how this finals series go.


One, Lopez, again, is superb on the defensive glass, and this can't really be debated at this point.

On/Off DRB%
20-21: +2
19-20: +1.9
18-19: +1.5
17-18: +1.7
16-17: +3.2
15-16: +3.9
14-15: +2.7
13-14: +2.8
12-13: +1.5
11-12: +.6
10-11: -.2
09-10: +.5
08-09: +4.6

Ayton, meanwhile, was -4.2 DRB% this season. He grabs offensive rebounds which make him look better, and that happens to be a major strength for Milwaukee. You're just not making a whole lot of sense here.

Re: Atlanta, they start two traditionally sized frontcourt players when most teams have gone smaller. They certainly do not play "very small size wise." Meanwhile, the Sixers are started a guy the size of a traditional wing at the 4 in Harris. What?



Dude let’s be real Hawks are tiny on their playstyle. Collins was a non factor for a long while. Bucks are big and so is the Sixers.

Ben, Harris, Embiid, Howard we’ve been too top heavy if anything. Our guards are small that’s it. Hawks have tiny tiny guards let’s not forget that.
Thybulle and Green, Hill on the wings. Dude Sixers are big lol


The poster listed 13 seasons worth of data and 20,000 minutes and you’re talking about Atlanta? Look at his post—while Lopez is on court, his teams defensively rebound better. Most of the seasons see his teams 2% higher in DRB% and 2% is significant. The 10th best defensive rebounding this season vs. the 27th best was separated by 2%.
lessthanjake wrote:Kyrie was extremely impactful without LeBron, and basically had zero impact whatsoever if LeBron was on the court.

lessthanjake wrote: By playing in a way that prevents Kyrie from getting much impact, LeBron ensures that controlling for Kyrie has limited effect…
skones
RealGM
Posts: 37,108
And1: 17,267
Joined: Jul 20, 2004

Re: NBA Finals: (2) Suns vs (3) Bucks, Part 1 | Series tied 0-0 

Post#319 » by skones » Tue Jul 6, 2021 6:24 pm

Hsker4Life wrote:
You’re reeling.

Lakers > Heat. That includes the Lakers without AD. And the Heat were not “completely healthy”. They traded Bradley and Olynyk for Oladipo. Did you forget that? Hint: Oladipo didn’t play in the playoffs.

Nets without Kyrie and Harden would beat the Nuggets without Murrey? It’s possible. But the Nuggets knew they would be without Murrey for a long time. They prepared for it.

And the Hawks? Without Trae Young? Without Deandre Hunter?

Any criticism you or anyone else supporting a Bucks avatar may give PHX for their path, that exact same criticism can be applied to Milwaukee’s path. I’m sorry that upsets you.


Ok, more spin.

The Lakers were 19-17 without AD. That's not better than the Heat.

Oh look, weakness and inconsistency in your own argument. The Heat weren't healthy because they didn't have Oladipo, but the Nuggets prepared for Murray.

Right, man, it was almost as if we had a back to back MVP sitting on the shelf for two straight games and then ultimately knocked out the healthier Atlanta team in game 6 on the road. Sheesh.

The last sentence? ITS LITERALLY THE POINT IM MAKING. You're sitting there opening the door for anyone to walk right in and call the title you could win a complete fraud based upon circumstance. I didn't do that to Toronto. I didn't do that to LA. I don't do it, because those excuses say nothing other than, "My team wasn't good enough to be there and I'm salty." A ring is a ring.

I'm not reeling at all, I just understand the context of this more than you do and recognize that it's a fruitless endeavor to argue the merits of which "path is easier" but here you are anyway, trying to stir the pot and applying things one way without doing so the other. That's subjective and it's biased. I can literally do this all day, and I'm sure you could to. It's why I don't say stupid **** like, "yours was easier" to make me feel better out of insecurity. It's you who needs to settle down. Have some class and enjoy the finals.
otmshank1
Junior
Posts: 418
And1: 422
Joined: Dec 29, 2006
Location: WI
     

Re: NBA Finals: (2) Suns vs (3) Bucks, Part 1 | Series tied 0-0 

Post#320 » by otmshank1 » Tue Jul 6, 2021 6:43 pm

Can we all please stop with the injury narratives? Both teams won series against injured teams, had injuries of their own, and will have to deal with injuries in this series. That happens every year and neither team's success should be discounted because of it.
I'm sober enough to know what I'm doing, and drunk enough to really enjoy doing it

Return to The General Board