spanishninja wrote:
so who are we getting? Cassidy? Doris?
Malika Andrews
Moderators: bwgood77, bisme37, zimpy27, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, Domejandro, ken6199, infinite11285, Clav, Dirk
spanishninja wrote:
so who are we getting? Cassidy? Doris?
zshawn10 wrote:spanishninja wrote:
so who are we getting? Cassidy? Doris?
Malika Andrews
Deep into that darkness peering, long I stood there wondering, fearing, Doubting, dreaming dreams no mortal ever dared to dream before;
zshawn10 wrote:jsierra1985 wrote:I was 8 freaking years old when i watched the suns in the finals in 93'
I am F*CKING HYPED about all this.
I dont care about the road to the finals. Or injury talk blah blah....
SUNS 4 MORE EFFIN WINS!
Congrats; your team is a -195 series favorite in Vegas which is pretty big and the consensus is Suns in 5 or 6

skones wrote:bwgood77 wrote:
It's not like they got to play the Nets missing 2 superstars and playing like a 6 man rotation of mostly role players with KD and sometimes Harden who likely hurt the team when on the floor. They still had problems with them.
I'm not going to sit here and harp on injuries like others are, but if you're going to argue with these guys, don't drag the Bucks into it. You're right that you didn't get to play the Nets with KD and a bunch of roleplayers (even though Harden played 3 and Irving three and a half), instead you literally played the Clippers led by Paul George and a bunch of roleplayers. There's a gulf between the two even before you consider a second star actually played games. Don't be petty towards us to cover your team's ass. It's embarrassing.
skones wrote:bwgood77 wrote:
It's not like they got to play the Nets missing 2 superstars and playing like a 6 man rotation of mostly role players with KD and sometimes Harden who likely hurt the team when on the floor. They still had problems with them.
I'm not going to sit here and harp on injuries like others are, but if you're going to argue with these guys, don't drag the Bucks into it. You're right that you didn't get to play the Nets with KD and a bunch of roleplayers (even though Harden played 3 and Irving three and a half), instead you literally played the Clippers led by Paul George and a bunch of roleplayers. There's a gulf between the two even before you consider a second star actually played games. Don't be petty towards us to cover your team's ass. It's embarrassing.
bwgood77 wrote:skones wrote:bwgood77 wrote:
It's not like they got to play the Nets missing 2 superstars and playing like a 6 man rotation of mostly role players with KD and sometimes Harden who likely hurt the team when on the floor. They still had problems with them.
I'm not going to sit here and harp on injuries like others are, but if you're going to argue with these guys, don't drag the Bucks into it. You're right that you didn't get to play the Nets with KD and a bunch of roleplayers (even though Harden played 3 and Irving three and a half), instead you literally played the Clippers led by Paul George and a bunch of roleplayers. There's a gulf between the two even before you consider a second star actually played games. Don't be petty towards us to cover your team's ass. It's embarrassing.
I wouldn't have brought the Bucks into it if it wasn't a Bucks fan trolling the Suns that I was replying to. Harden was worthless going 1-10 in a game the Nets actually won and like 5-26 from 3 in the games he played including 2-22 in 2 of them. But aside from that their best player was Harris who went like 8-33 from 3 the last 5 games, under 25%, then outside of that they had a washed Griffin, Brown, and guys like Claxton and James off the bench.
Anyway, I wouldn't have brought that into it if the Bucks fan didn't start it and like I said in the rest of the post you cut out of your quote, they shouldn't apologize for beating up a team with multiple injured all All NBA caliber players either. That's the team that was put in front of them.
Hsker4Life wrote:Settle down. The Bucks path was easier, still.
Heat, Nets, Hawks

skones wrote:bwgood77 wrote:skones wrote:
I'm not going to sit here and harp on injuries like others are, but if you're going to argue with these guys, don't drag the Bucks into it. You're right that you didn't get to play the Nets with KD and a bunch of roleplayers (even though Harden played 3 and Irving three and a half), instead you literally played the Clippers led by Paul George and a bunch of roleplayers. There's a gulf between the two even before you consider a second star actually played games. Don't be petty towards us to cover your team's ass. It's embarrassing.
I wouldn't have brought the Bucks into it if it wasn't a Bucks fan trolling the Suns that I was replying to. Harden was worthless going 1-10 in a game the Nets actually won and like 5-26 from 3 in the games he played including 2-22 in 2 of them. But aside from that their best player was Harris who went like 8-33 from 3 the last 5 games, under 25%, then outside of that they had a washed Griffin, Brown, and guys like Claxton and James off the bench.
Anyway, I wouldn't have brought that into it if the Bucks fan didn't start it and like I said in the rest of the post you cut out of your quote, they shouldn't apologize for beating up a team with multiple injured all All NBA caliber players either. That's the team that was put in front of them.
Doranku's been around here since February 2020 and the first mention of the Bucks in his search history was May 5th.
bwgood77 wrote:
Well he has a Bucks logo and maybe didn't get hyped until the playoffs were close...I don't know and didn't research his post history...just noticed he was a Bucks fan according to the teams he lists as his favorites.
Doranku wrote:Giannis is just so unskilled. Very difficult to root for
skones wrote:Hsker4Life wrote:Settle down. The Bucks path was easier, still.
Heat, Nets, Hawks
Do not tell me to settle down and then continue pushing that same narrative.

skones wrote:bwgood77 wrote:
Well he has a Bucks logo and maybe didn't get hyped until the playoffs were close...I don't know and didn't research his post history...just noticed he was a Bucks fan according to the teams he lists as his favorites.
The Browns logo is about all you need to see to raise a red flag. But hey, as we all know, fans of teams say things like (on the GB, zero posts on our board) what's written below during the Brooklyn series.Doranku wrote:Giannis is just so unskilled. Very difficult to root for
I'm going to hold you to a higher standard here given you're a global mod.
Hsker4Life wrote:skones wrote:Hsker4Life wrote:Settle down. The Bucks path was easier, still.
Heat, Nets, Hawks
Do not tell me to settle down and then continue pushing that same narrative.
Settle down.
A Bucks fan was sarcastically trolling the Suns, and you got upset with a Suns fan pointing out the Bucks’ path. That makes no sense.
And yes, the Bucks have had the easier path to this point.
skones wrote:Hsker4Life wrote:skones wrote:
Do not tell me to settle down and then continue pushing that same narrative.
Settle down.
A Bucks fan was sarcastically trolling the Suns, and you got upset with a Suns fan pointing out the Bucks’ path. That makes no sense.
And yes, the Bucks have had the easier path to this point.
He is not a Bucks fan, as previously stated. Please follow along.
but k. cool. Our first round matchup featured a 6 seed (not a 7), a team that was in the finals last year, and they were completely healthy. We swept. You faced a battered 7 seed who made the finals and didn't. Kevin Durant was better than any player than you'd face throughout your path to the playoffs. In fact, I'll sit here and just say the Nets would have beaten Denver because we're just tossing around arbitrary things like "easier." Tell me how many times you didn't have home court advantage. And then you faced noted playoff choker Paul George in the conference finals and STILL almost went down? And you're sitting there having the audacity to call anyone's path easier?
I can spin things too, so it's best you just give it up and don't.
DCasey91 wrote:skones wrote:DCasey91 wrote:
Hawks play very small size wise. I just don’t think Lopez is a great rebounder that’s pretty much it.
We out rebounded them too, we just forgot that we were big lol
We’ll see how this finals series go.
One, Lopez, again, is superb on the defensive glass, and this can't really be debated at this point.
On/Off DRB%
20-21: +2
19-20: +1.9
18-19: +1.5
17-18: +1.7
16-17: +3.2
15-16: +3.9
14-15: +2.7
13-14: +2.8
12-13: +1.5
11-12: +.6
10-11: -.2
09-10: +.5
08-09: +4.6
Ayton, meanwhile, was -4.2 DRB% this season. He grabs offensive rebounds which make him look better, and that happens to be a major strength for Milwaukee. You're just not making a whole lot of sense here.
Re: Atlanta, they start two traditionally sized frontcourt players when most teams have gone smaller. They certainly do not play "very small size wise." Meanwhile, the Sixers are started a guy the size of a traditional wing at the 4 in Harris. What?
Dude let’s be real Hawks are tiny on their playstyle. Collins was a non factor for a long while. Bucks are big and so is the Sixers.
Ben, Harris, Embiid, Howard we’ve been too top heavy if anything. Our guards are small that’s it. Hawks have tiny tiny guards let’s not forget that.
Thybulle and Green, Hill on the wings. Dude Sixers are big lol
lessthanjake wrote:Kyrie was extremely impactful without LeBron, and basically had zero impact whatsoever if LeBron was on the court.
lessthanjake wrote: By playing in a way that prevents Kyrie from getting much impact, LeBron ensures that controlling for Kyrie has limited effect…
Hsker4Life wrote:
You’re reeling.
Lakers > Heat. That includes the Lakers without AD. And the Heat were not “completely healthy”. They traded Bradley and Olynyk for Oladipo. Did you forget that? Hint: Oladipo didn’t play in the playoffs.
Nets without Kyrie and Harden would beat the Nuggets without Murrey? It’s possible. But the Nuggets knew they would be without Murrey for a long time. They prepared for it.
And the Hawks? Without Trae Young? Without Deandre Hunter?
Any criticism you or anyone else supporting a Bucks avatar may give PHX for their path, that exact same criticism can be applied to Milwaukee’s path. I’m sorry that upsets you.