nickhx2 wrote:Why shouldn't we be content to let them face their own consequences?
I'm not sure how you can ask that question and then in the same vein recognize that hospital resources are finite.
People capable of catching covid and being hospitalized are also finite. Isn't that the purpose of the vaccine? Only a small minority of people with covid are hospitalized or require any medical attention. Regardless of covid, we need to ensure we have the infrastructure and resources to support the country in the event of a pandemic. During the peak, we had floating hospitals, NG flown in, nurses and doctors shipped around the country, field hospitals that went unused.
We aren't at risk of overwhelming the healthcare system, everyone that needs medical attention is receiving it (outside of some random cases that don't pass the reasonable test)
I know one ICU nurse in a midwestern state and a doctor in florida and their stories are the same. ICU beds are 99% filled with unvaccinated people and they are taxed to the brim
.
Hospitals work at near max capacity regularly, they do this to reduce costs. Even during flu season hospitals hit max or near max cap.
Actually the doctor's hospital literally has zero vaccinated hospitalizations. My sister who is also a nurse in PA, has it much easier. She's in allegheny county, which is a very progressive part of pennsylvania and her work ever since the start of the pandemic has been pretty normal, because people have committed to masks and vaccinations. people wore masks when they were supposed to, and the county reached the 70% vaccination rate very quickly.
That's great anecdotal evidence but PA is on the upswing in covid cases. So reaching 70% is nice but how does that reflect in terms of covid cases/deaths? Covid is following a patter, it dips in the summer and explodes in the cooler weather. It seems to me that states with the highest vaccination rates should also be the states with dwindling covid cases. Maybe I'm asking too much from the vaccine.
Now, more to the point, i'm one of those guys who firmly believes "you get what you ask for", but it's not even remotely as simple as letting the players get what they deserve, because they are public figures in public venues that have greater chances of exposure to the virus as well as greater chances to expose OTHERS to the virus. Just because they aren't ron artest in the stands doesn't mean they aren't gonna go home and bring it to the people around them, or wherever else they frequent (look at kyrie and james harden partying last year).
But if the vaccine works, how exactly is an unvaccinated person spreading it to the vaccinated? You even provided an anecdote that people that are taking the shot are not getting sick. Okay, so why does that standard disappear in the case of vaxxed mingling with unvaxxed?
The other part of the equation and maybe most important, is that the "other" people who haven't gotten vaccinated are not all in the same boat as skeptics who should "reap what they sow. Minorities have lower rates of vaccination. Children under a certain age don't qualify. Healthcare workers who got the first wave of shots (like my sister, or the ICU nurse who worked with covid patients day in and day out for 7 months before he recently got covid) have immunities that are now waning. You are bordering on being disingenuous because it's hard to tell if you're intentionally failing to acknowledge the ever-present and still at-risk population.
[/quote]
I'm not being disingenuous at all. I'm asking why a vaccine that is labeled effective suddenly isn't effective when its proponents want to force it on people
"take the vaccine or ur gonna make everyone else sick!"also
"listen people who are getting covid aren't the vaxxed, it's the dumb unvaxxed"So the vaccinated aren't getting covid because they're vaccinated. But also the unvaccinated are giving the vaccinated covid.
There is zero consistency.
Please keep posts about how the rules regarding COVID impact the NBA if you want to avoid a strike.