Like you can with Embiid lol.LessEyeTest wrote:eyeatoma wrote:I seem to remember the same thing from you two years ago, offering a bunch of mental gymnastics of why Sixers being in first wasn't enough for Embiid to win MVP.Cubbies2120 wrote:
Two things:
1. Few weeks ago when #1 seed looked out of question, you said Jokic would need #1 seed. Now he needs a SIZEABLE lead at first? Despite his numbers getting even better?
2. In another thread, when Nuggets had same record as Grizzlies, you said they are TIED for first. Now, with same scenario in this MVP thread, Pelicans are > Nuggets for first.
Guess when Nuggets are in 1st with another team they’re either “tied” for first or 2nd seed
Pot meet kettle.
Sent from my SM-S908E using Tapatalk
So you’re finally admitting you can’t be impartial about Jokic? Perfect, thanks!
Sent from my SM-S908E using Tapatalk




















