Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard

Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285

User avatar
boogie-reke
Head Coach
Posts: 6,920
And1: 244
Joined: Nov 05, 2010
   

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#561 » by boogie-reke » Sun Jul 8, 2012 11:42 pm

Shaheen wrote:
Josephpaul wrote:So the brooklyn team on opening day will look like this possibly ?
PG Deron Willams
SG Joe Johnson
SF Gerald Wallace
PF Marcus Camby
C Dwight Howard

Bench??


Mirza Teletovic
Tyshawn Taylor
Reggie Evans

Then 4 more contracts on the veterans minimum. Possibilities include Al Thronton and resigning Gerald Green.


Don't forget you're surely getting some dump-offs from the Magic in this too, so that's more to that bench.

Duhon\J-Rich\Q-Rich\Hedo.
User avatar
Jordan45822
RealGM
Posts: 13,564
And1: 1,891
Joined: Jun 18, 2007

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#562 » by Jordan45822 » Sun Jul 8, 2012 11:45 pm

Tommy Dee ‏@TommyDeeTKB
this sounds like a whopper of a deal. 11 players in total. Complicated to say the least. #magic #nets


Tommy Dee ‏@TommyDeeTKB
11 players non confirmed, but that's what it is sounding like from what I hear. no names in particular though.


damn
User avatar
boogie-reke
Head Coach
Posts: 6,920
And1: 244
Joined: Nov 05, 2010
   

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#563 » by boogie-reke » Sun Jul 8, 2012 11:47 pm

I'm so pumped, and i'm not even a Nets fan.
MannyRam99
Banned User
Posts: 3,321
And1: 33
Joined: Apr 28, 2012

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#564 » by MannyRam99 » Sun Jul 8, 2012 11:48 pm

Jordan45822 wrote:
Tommy Dee ‏@TommyDeeTKB
this sounds like a whopper of a deal. 11 players in total. Complicated to say the least. #magic #nets


Tommy Dee ‏@TommyDeeTKB
11 players non confirmed, but that's what it is sounding like from what I hear. no names in particular though.


damn

wtf..
Trader_Joe
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 29,176
And1: 3,953
Joined: Jan 19, 2009
 

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#565 » by Trader_Joe » Sun Jul 8, 2012 11:49 pm

Jordan45822 wrote:
Tommy Dee ‏@TommyDeeTKB
this sounds like a whopper of a deal. 11 players in total. Complicated to say the least. #magic #nets


Tommy Dee ‏@TommyDeeTKB
11 players non confirmed, but that's what it is sounding like from what I hear. no names in particular though.


damn

If I had to guess.


BK

Lopez
Humphries
Brooks
Gaines
D.James
A.Johnson
S.Williams
3 #1
$3m Cash
Rights to any foreign players

ORL
Howard
J.Rich
Q.Rich
Duhon
smokeylarue
Junior
Posts: 280
And1: 234
Joined: Dec 09, 2011
   

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#566 » by smokeylarue » Sun Jul 8, 2012 11:50 pm

I can't believe Orlando management is picking Brook Lopez over Andrew Bynum if this is true.
Josephpaul
Banned User
Posts: 7,261
And1: 295
Joined: Jan 28, 2012

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#567 » by Josephpaul » Sun Jul 8, 2012 11:51 pm

11 players wow
Shaheen
Banned User
Posts: 2,767
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 01, 2010

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#568 » by Shaheen » Sun Jul 8, 2012 11:51 pm

smokeylarue wrote:I can't believe Orlando management is picking Brook Lopez over Andrew Bynum if this is true.


Better Lopez, Brooks, picks than one season of Bynum. Put yourself in their position.
World Peace
Banned User
Posts: 1,578
And1: 0
Joined: Dec 29, 2011
Location: San Antonio, TX

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#569 » by World Peace » Sun Jul 8, 2012 11:51 pm

Jordan45822 wrote:
Tommy Dee ‏@TommyDeeTKB
this sounds like a whopper of a deal. 11 players in total. Complicated to say the least. #magic #nets


Tommy Dee ‏@TommyDeeTKB
11 players non confirmed, but that's what it is sounding like from what I hear. no names in particular though.


damn

Not a legit source at all.
WhoLAhoop
Sophomore
Posts: 144
And1: 1
Joined: Jan 17, 2012

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#570 » by WhoLAhoop » Sun Jul 8, 2012 11:51 pm

Looks like Orlando is cleaning house if true.
Shaheen
Banned User
Posts: 2,767
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 01, 2010

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#571 » by Shaheen » Sun Jul 8, 2012 11:52 pm

World Peace wrote:Not a legit source at all.


Wrong he was the first one to report Cleveland in the deal and Woj even referred to him in a post.
smokeylarue
Junior
Posts: 280
And1: 234
Joined: Dec 09, 2011
   

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#572 » by smokeylarue » Sun Jul 8, 2012 11:54 pm

Picks from elite playoff teams are pretty worthless though.
User avatar
Jordan45822
RealGM
Posts: 13,564
And1: 1,891
Joined: Jun 18, 2007

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#573 » by Jordan45822 » Sun Jul 8, 2012 11:54 pm

World Peace wrote:
Jordan45822 wrote:
Tommy Dee ‏@TommyDeeTKB
this sounds like a whopper of a deal. 11 players in total. Complicated to say the least. #magic #nets


Tommy Dee ‏@TommyDeeTKB
11 players non confirmed, but that's what it is sounding like from what I hear. no names in particular though.


damn

Not a legit source at all.


he is the first one to report Cleveland in the 3 way deal. And was Credited by Woj and Berger
NBA Fan 1234
RealGM
Posts: 48,653
And1: 28,365
Joined: Jul 16, 2009

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#574 » by NBA Fan 1234 » Sun Jul 8, 2012 11:55 pm

Tommy Dee has gotten one thing right in his many attempts -- Amar'e to NY. That's it.
Lenear1030
Junior
Posts: 307
And1: 41
Joined: Jun 17, 2010
     

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#575 » by Lenear1030 » Sun Jul 8, 2012 11:55 pm

smokeylarue wrote:I can't believe Orlando management is picking Brook Lopez over Andrew Bynum if this is true.



Brook Lopez over a Bynum rental with chance to extend, to be exact....
User avatar
[The-Warriors]
Junior
Posts: 361
And1: 0
Joined: May 28, 2012
Location: Buffalo, NY

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#576 » by [The-Warriors] » Sun Jul 8, 2012 11:57 pm

Lenear1030 wrote:
smokeylarue wrote:I can't believe Orlando management is picking Brook Lopez over Andrew Bynum if this is true.



Brook Lopez over a Bynum rental with chance to extend, to be exact....

The main reason why Orlando might be doing it is because the Nets may be more willing to take on the bad contracts than LA.
World Peace
Banned User
Posts: 1,578
And1: 0
Joined: Dec 29, 2011
Location: San Antonio, TX

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#577 » by World Peace » Sun Jul 8, 2012 11:58 pm

Paco wrote:Tommy Dee has gotten one thing right in his many attempts -- Amar'e to NY. That's it.
User avatar
Jordan45822
RealGM
Posts: 13,564
And1: 1,891
Joined: Jun 18, 2007

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#578 » by Jordan45822 » Mon Jul 9, 2012 12:02 am

what about a 3 way trade with LA, Houston, and Orlando?
User avatar
boogie-reke
Head Coach
Posts: 6,920
And1: 244
Joined: Nov 05, 2010
   

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#579 » by boogie-reke » Mon Jul 9, 2012 12:03 am

smokeylarue wrote:Picks from elite playoff teams are pretty worthless though.


They're gonna dump salary though. on top of multiple picks, Brooks and Lopez? that's a pretty good get when your 2nd option is 1 year rental of Bynum.
World Peace
Banned User
Posts: 1,578
And1: 0
Joined: Dec 29, 2011
Location: San Antonio, TX

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#580 » by World Peace » Mon Jul 9, 2012 12:04 am

Jordan45822 wrote:what about a 3 way trade with LA, Houston, and Orlando?

Depends who gets Dwight?

Return to The General Board