Should Fred Van Vleet be an all-star?
Moderators: KingDavid, cupcakesnake, Domejandro, ken6199, infinite11285, Clav, Dirk, bwgood77, bisme37, zimpy27
Re: Should Fred Van Vleet be an all-star?
-
JLei
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,581
- And1: 3,005
- Joined: Aug 25, 2009
-
Re: Should Fred Van Vleet be an all-star?
Yes and easily.
Modern Era Fantasy Game Champ!
PG: Ricky Rubio 16
SG: Brandon Roy 09
SF: Danny Green 14
PF: Rasheed Wallace 06
C: Shaquille O'Neal 01
G: George Hill 14
F: Anthony Parker 10
C: Amir Johnson 12
PG: Ricky Rubio 16
SG: Brandon Roy 09
SF: Danny Green 14
PF: Rasheed Wallace 06
C: Shaquille O'Neal 01
G: George Hill 14
F: Anthony Parker 10
C: Amir Johnson 12
Re: Should Fred Van Vleet be an all-star?
-
MGB8
- RealGM
- Posts: 19,024
- And1: 3,639
- Joined: Jul 20, 2001
- Location: Philly
Re: Should Fred Van Vleet be an all-star?
Duffman100 wrote:MGB8 wrote:Duffman100 wrote:
We really aren't though. Our front 5 are great (Fred, Trent, OG, Barnes, Siakam) but it's a massive drop off after that. Our bench is horrendous.
Boucher isn’t horrendous, nor Precious. Neither is Birch. So 4-5 depth is top notch, and since Barnes can slide to the 3 and playoff rotations are tight, it’s the 1-2 that is the depth problem. Raps would be better off with as I and Flynn being third stringers rather than 2nd…l. If there was only an experienced combo guard out there, with serious playoff experiences, capable of playing the 1 or 2, can shoot and create - can sacrifice some D because of backstop.
I read about this guy who played in Miami for a few years recently, then got traded… where in the world did he end up?
Boucher has been pretty bad this season. Incredibly inconsistent.
Precious ( love the potential ) but is an overall negative on offense.
Birch has been injured a bunch.
Yuta is our best bench player, that's... a problem. The rest is Banton, Flynn, Svi, Champagne.
You'd would be hard pressed to find a worse bench in the league.
Not many teams have non-inconsistent or otherwise flawed reserves. If they weren’t flawed, they’d be starters. Boucher is a solid reserve big, and so is Precious. Birch is an excellent 5th big.
Don’t know much about Yuma, do know that Flynn and Svi have flashed bits, but have their own issues (especially on D)…. but with a strong top 5, you need 4 more guys for a playoff rotation, and 2 of those are covered by the reserve switchable 4-5s. Assuming health, not a horrid challenge. And if Wantabe is legit playoff-rotation worthy, that means that the Raps are one legit 3rd / combo guard away…. Like that Euro guy…
Re: Should Fred Van Vleet be an all-star?
-
gp2015
- RealGM
- Posts: 14,909
- And1: 11,381
- Joined: Apr 13, 2007
- Location: Toronto
-
Re: Should Fred Van Vleet be an all-star?
MGB8 wrote:Duffman100 wrote:MGB8 wrote:
Boucher isn’t horrendous, nor Precious. Neither is Birch. So 4-5 depth is top notch, and since Barnes can slide to the 3 and playoff rotations are tight, it’s the 1-2 that is the depth problem. Raps would be better off with as I and Flynn being third stringers rather than 2nd…l. If there was only an experienced combo guard out there, with serious playoff experiences, capable of playing the 1 or 2, can shoot and create - can sacrifice some D because of backstop.
I read about this guy who played in Miami for a few years recently, then got traded… where in the world did he end up?
Boucher has been pretty bad this season. Incredibly inconsistent.
Precious ( love the potential ) but is an overall negative on offense.
Birch has been injured a bunch.
Yuta is our best bench player, that's... a problem. The rest is Banton, Flynn, Svi, Champagne.
You'd would be hard pressed to find a worse bench in the league.
Not many teams have non-inconsistent or otherwise flawed reserves. If they weren’t flawed, they’d be starters. Boucher is a solid reserve big, and so is Precious. Birch is an excellent 5th big.
Don’t know much about Yuma, do know that Flynn and Svi have flashed bits, but have their own issues (especially on D)…. but with a strong top 5, you need 4 more guys for a playoff rotation, and 2 of those are covered by the reserve switchable 4-5s. Assuming health, not a horrid challenge. And if Wantabe is legit playoff-rotation worthy, that means that the Raps are one legit 3rd / combo guard away…. Like that Euro guy…
There's a reason why we have the worst bench scoring in the entire league.
https://www.nba.com/stats/teams/traditional/?sort=PTS&dir=1&Season=2021-22&SeasonType=Regular%20Season&StarterBench=Bench
"I'm doing what I love to do. So if I can never walk again because of what I love to do, that's a chance I'll take. I'll die on the court." - Alvin Williams
Re: Should Fred Van Vleet be an all-star?
-
MGB8
- RealGM
- Posts: 19,024
- And1: 3,639
- Joined: Jul 20, 2001
- Location: Philly
Re: Should Fred Van Vleet be an all-star?
gp2015 wrote:MGB8 wrote:Duffman100 wrote:
Boucher has been pretty bad this season. Incredibly inconsistent.
Precious ( love the potential ) but is an overall negative on offense.
Birch has been injured a bunch.
Yuta is our best bench player, that's... a problem. The rest is Banton, Flynn, Svi, Champagne.
You'd would be hard pressed to find a worse bench in the league.
Not many teams have non-inconsistent or otherwise flawed reserves. If they weren’t flawed, they’d be starters. Boucher is a solid reserve big, and so is Precious. Birch is an excellent 5th big.
Don’t know much about Yuma, do know that Flynn and Svi have flashed bits, but have their own issues (especially on D)…. but with a strong top 5, you need 4 more guys for a playoff rotation, and 2 of those are covered by the reserve switchable 4-5s. Assuming health, not a horrid challenge. And if Wantabe is legit playoff-rotation worthy, that means that the Raps are one legit 3rd / combo guard away…. Like that Euro guy…
There's a reason why we have the worst bench scoring in the entire league.
https://www.nba.com/stats/teams/traditional/?sort=PTS&dir=1&Season=2021-22&SeasonType=Regular%20Season&StarterBench=Bench
Did you notice that 3 of the 4 top bench scoring teams are bottom feeders. Chicago is the 2nd worst bench scoring team. Followed by the Celtics, Bucks, Sixers and Nets.
But, yeah, Toronto lacks a strong bench scorer. But literally 1 strong bench scorer and they are middling rather than poor in that regard.
The bigger issue is lack of elite offensive scoring in the starting unit, where it’s all “good” to “very good” producers rather than anyone truly elite. But that is offset by team ball and defensive talent.. kind of the inverse of the Bulls “offense first” squad.
Re: Should Fred Van Vleet be an all-star?
- ForeverTFC
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,111
- And1: 19,798
- Joined: Dec 07, 2004
-
Re: Should Fred Van Vleet be an all-star?
coldfish wrote:Here are the east's best by PER, 30mpg:
1 Giannis Antetokounmpo, MIL
2 Joel Embiid, PHI
3 Jimmy Butler, MIA
4 Trae Young, ATL
5 Kevin Durant, BKN
6 Jarrett Allen, CLE
7 DeMar DeRozan, CHI
8 Domantas Sabonis, IND
9 Zach LaVine, CHI
10 Clint Capela, ATL
11 Daniel Gafford, WSH
12 James Harden, BKN
13 John Collins, ATL
14 LaMelo Ball, CHA
15 Jrue Holiday, MIL
16 Bam Adebayo, MIA
17 Fred VanVleet, TOR
I know PER isn't the end all be all stat but there are a lot of very productive players on playoff level teams. FVV would have to jump over several in order to get on the roster.
You conceded that PER is flawed - especially for guards - so I'll engage on this in good faith.
No brainer LOCKS - 9 players: Giannis, Embiid, Butler, Young, Durant, Allen, DeRozan, Lavine, Holiday
So we have 3 spots to fill to get to 12:
In the running- 5 players: Sabonis, Harden, Ball, Bam, FVV
Not in the running OUT - 3 player: Gafford, Collins, Capela
so 5 players to fill the spots. Bam probably missed too much time and won't be there. Harden likely gets in. So now you have 2 spots for Sabonis, Lamelo and FVV. Let's pick across the criteria people have mentioned:
1. Team success: Raps and Hornets both at .500, Indiana way below
2. Counting stats: FVV leads in PPG and 3p% (shooting 40% from 3 while 6th in 3p attempts per game in the league), Ball leads in APG, Sabonis has the big man stats
3. Defense: FVV unquestionably the best defender of the bunch
4. Advanced stats: FVV just crushes here
So even if we go off of PER, FVV should get in. Now, this doesn't have Tatum on it and Boston likely gets a player but I can't see how "it's not even close" that FVV is an all-star this year. It's clearly extremely close and some of the best pundits in the league (e.g. Zach Lowe) say he should be a lock.
-
Re: Should Fred Van Vleet be an all-star?
-
Alfred
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 24,350
- And1: 20,853
- Joined: Jul 08, 2006
-
Re: Should Fred Van Vleet be an all-star?
JujitsuFlip wrote:No. East is WAY too guard heavy and the Raps are WAY too bad.
I’ll have you know that the Raptors are in fact the definition of mediocre!

Re: Should Fred Van Vleet be an all-star?
-
pipfan
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,629
- And1: 4,404
- Joined: Aug 07, 2010
Re: Should Fred Van Vleet be an all-star?
I think he is a marginal All Star-he will sneak into the game at some point. He is deserving.
The real question is, should Tor deal him and Siakam and rebuild?-I would, if I were them. Build around OG, Trent and Barnes-maybe Precious too
The real question is, should Tor deal him and Siakam and rebuild?-I would, if I were them. Build around OG, Trent and Barnes-maybe Precious too
Re: Should Fred Van Vleet be an all-star?
-
AussieCeltic
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,019
- And1: 24,234
- Joined: Jan 02, 2014
-
Re: Should Fred Van Vleet be an all-star?
LoveMyRaps wrote:JujitsuFlip wrote:And have A LOT of tough games coming up if you bothered to look ahead on the schedule.LoveMyRaps wrote:
Casuals. Raptors literally have only one more loss than the 5th seed 76ers.
Lmaooo what do their future games have to do with their current record???? You claim they are "WAY too bad", even though they're a .500 team despite being one of the most injury depleted teams in the league this season.
Every fricken team is depleted!!
Games you’ve won without the oppositions best player.
- Spurs without Murray
- Knicks without Randle
- Clippers without Kawhi/PG
- Warriors without Curry/Green
- Bucks without Giannis
- Sixers without Embiid
I’m not saying Raptors are a bad team or they haven’t had covid issues but so has everyone. That excuse doesn’t fly anymore.
LaLover11 wrote:I bet you $100 Mavs beat the Celtics
Re: Should Fred Van Vleet be an all-star?
-
Dan Z
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,707
- And1: 9,289
- Joined: Feb 19, 2002
- Location: Chicago
-
Re: Should Fred Van Vleet be an all-star?
lobosloboslobos wrote:Interesting that there's now a thread on the GB debating whether Ja Morant is the best PG in the league this year while in this thread lots of folks insist Freddy isn't an all-star. And yet their numbers are almost identical except for Ja having 4 more ppg.
ppg: Ja 25, FVV 21 (Ja 19 FGA, FVV 16.6 FGA)
rbd: Ja 5.7, FVV 5
ast: Ja, 6.7, FVV 6.7
stl: Ja 1.4, FVV 1.6
blk: Ja 0.3, FVV, 0.6
3pt%: Ja .40, FVV .40
2pt%: Ja .518, FVV .481
FT%: Ja .766, FVV .878
eFG%: Ja .538, FVV .544
TOV: Ja 3.2, FVV 2.9
On top of that Ja's Usage is 32% whereas FVV's is 24%, so Ja uses up 30% more possessions to get those numbers than Freddy.
Now I don't think Ja is the best PG in the league but he has been damn good, yet still hasn't been better than Freddy. Just saying.
Ja is the best player on Memphis so of course he'll have more usage. He also has had moments this season where he took over at the end of a game(s) to help his team win. I guess you haven't watched him play this year.
FVV is a good player, but hasn't played better than Morant despite all the advance stats you want to pick out. Basketball isn't mathematics.
Re: Should Fred Van Vleet be an all-star?
-
Gasolina
- Junior
- Posts: 260
- And1: 529
- Joined: Aug 17, 2021
-
Re: Should Fred Van Vleet be an all-star?
Not this year, because their record is likely to be too poor. But he will make multiple teams in the future. He’s a highly impactful player. One of those casual filters.
Re: Should Fred Van Vleet be an all-star?
- SoulJah
- Rookie
- Posts: 1,244
- And1: 516
- Joined: Dec 25, 2002
-
Re: Should Fred Van Vleet be an all-star?
therealozzykhan wrote:Big J wrote:HELL NO! This is a cute story, but the All Star game is for actual stars who lead their teams to wins.
lol theres some Raptors fans who wouldn't trade FVV for Simmons. As many issues as Simmons has, hes a better player than FVV.
I'm a Raptors fan but I think Philly would dump Simmons for FVV in a heart beat... FVV is a much better player and rises up in a clutch unlike Simmons who's over-rated af. I'm sure even Philly fans agree how over-rate he is now.
Re: Should Fred Van Vleet be an all-star?
-
payton2kemp
- Starter
- Posts: 2,340
- And1: 4,362
- Joined: Dec 15, 2014
- Location: I can't tell you. I'm an investigator.
-
Re: Should Fred Van Vleet be an all-star?
SoulJah wrote:therealozzykhan wrote:Big J wrote:HELL NO! This is a cute story, but the All Star game is for actual stars who lead their teams to wins.
lol theres some Raptors fans who wouldn't trade FVV for Simmons. As many issues as Simmons has, hes a better player than FVV.
I'm a Raptors fan but I think Philly would dump Simmons for FVV in a heart beat... FVV is a much better player and rises up in a clutch unlike Simmons who's over-rated af. I'm sure even Philly fans agree how over-rate he is now.
The Sixers were a first seed with Simmons last year. This year the Sixers are struggling without him. The Raptors were a lottery team with FVV last year, and are in 9th place so far this year so still a lottery team, hes and overrated midget point guard.
Re: Should Fred Van Vleet be an all-star?
-
Lockdown504090
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,935
- And1: 12,783
- Joined: Nov 24, 2015
-
Re: Should Fred Van Vleet be an all-star?
AussieCeltic wrote:LoveMyRaps wrote:JujitsuFlip wrote:And have A LOT of tough games coming up if you bothered to look ahead on the schedule.
Lmaooo what do their future games have to do with their current record???? You claim they are "WAY too bad", even though they're a .500 team despite being one of the most injury depleted teams in the league this season.
Every fricken team is depleted!!
Games you’ve won without the oppositions best player.
- Spurs without Murray
- Knicks without Randle
- Clippers without Kawhi/PG
- Warriors without Curry/Green
- Bucks without Giannis
- Sixers without Embiid
I’m not saying Raptors are a bad team or they haven’t had covid issues but so has everyone. That excuse doesn’t fly anymore.
isnt everyone either depleted or playing against depleted teams this year? i agree that that has a bearing if this is a discussion of how good a player he is, but not really in one if hes an all star. if we were giving a player of the week award, i dont think that would have a signifigant bearing on who gets it, so i dont think that will factor in when it comes all star time.
Re: Should Fred Van Vleet be an all-star?
-
Chandan
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,350
- And1: 22,015
- Joined: Nov 23, 2017
-
Re: Should Fred Van Vleet be an all-star?
god i hope not. Dont need him to start thinking he's a legit first option in this league for the sake of our future.

Re: Should Fred Van Vleet be an all-star?
-
dlts20
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,454
- And1: 6,195
- Joined: Dec 14, 2006
Re: Should Fred Van Vleet be an all-star?
Godaddycurse wrote:Quattro wrote:Big J wrote:HELL NO! This is a cute story, but the All Star game is for actual stars who lead their teams to wins.
Guess Lebron won’t be there since he’s led his team to the same record as Toronto this season?
So many infantile responses in this thread.
I doubt Fred makes it simply because the East is so guard heavy this year. Trae, Demar, Lavine, Beal and Harden are all going to be in front of him and then there’s a bunch of guys having just as good a year as Van Vleet vying for the last spot. Hope he makes it but don’t think it will happen.
I think FVV is more deserving than Beal this year. Beal's play have taken a big hit vs last year.
You clearly have not been watching Beal since the start of the season. He's been killing it and looking better than ever
Re: Should Fred Van Vleet be an all-star?
-
AussieCeltic
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,019
- And1: 24,234
- Joined: Jan 02, 2014
-
Re: Should Fred Van Vleet be an all-star?
everdiso wrote:Fred league ranks, before tonight:
Raptor #5
EPM #9
TPA #15
DPM #26
Lebron #30
The question isn't whether he should make the all-star team, but which All-NBA team he should make.
Going by RAPTOR then Derrick White, Steven Adams, D-Lo, Alex Caruso, Derrick Rose, Marcus Smart, Alec Burks, Jarred Vanderbilt are all All Star players.
Going by EPM then Javale Mcgee, Gary Payton II, Isiah Hartenstein, Kevin Love, Mike Muscala should all be all stars.
And so on and so forth.
Look he’s a fringe all star but not even close to all nba.
LaLover11 wrote:I bet you $100 Mavs beat the Celtics
Re: Should Fred Van Vleet be an all-star?
- everdiso
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,026
- And1: 10,551
- Joined: Nov 18, 2008
Re: Should Fred Van Vleet be an all-star?
AussieCeltic wrote:everdiso wrote:Fred league ranks, before tonight:
Raptor #5
EPM #9
TPA #15
DPM #26
Lebron #30
The question isn't whether he should make the all-star team, but which All-NBA team he should make.
Going by RAPTOR then Derrick White, Steven Adams, D-Lo, Alex Caruso, Derrick Rose, Marcus Smart, Alec Burks, Jarred Vanderbilt are all All Star players.
Going by EPM then Javale Mcgee, Gary Payton II, Isiah Hartenstein, Kevin Love, Mike Muscala should all be all stars.
And so on and so forth.
Look he’s a fringe all star but not even close to all nba.
1. None of those guys are at the top of ALL the metrics like Fred is
2. Yes it's easy for small-role small-minutes to put up gaudy impact metrics. This is irrelevant to Fred, who plays the most minutes in the league, as a primary ballhandler.
"I wasn't gonna act surprised - cuz I wasn't surprised."
Re: Should Fred Van Vleet be an all-star?
-
JN61
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,780
- And1: 9,312
- Joined: Jan 07, 2018
-
Re: Should Fred Van Vleet be an all-star?
PrinceAli wrote:JN61 wrote:No. Not good enough and raptors are 10th seed. Maybe if they were top 3 team.
We’re tied for 8th seed and just half a game back from 7th seed lol
Some of you are just spewing BS
That was their record before last night's game genius.. regardless how is he going to be selected as 20/6 guy playing huge minutes as all-star over multiple time all-stars putting up better numbers on better record teams? He is not.
Pennebaker wrote:And Bird did it while being a defensive liability. But he also made All-Defensive teams, which was another controversial issue regarding Bird and votes.
Re: Should Fred Van Vleet be an all-star?
-
old skool
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,019
- And1: 3,772
- Joined: Jul 07, 2005
- Location: Chi
Re: Should Fred Van Vleet be an all-star?
VanVleet has a shot at making the East All-Star team. Maybe among the top 12. Definitely should make the top 15 that will be considered when a small handful of players are named but left off the roster due to injury. It's been a crazy year, with the prospect for more unpredictable craziness before it is all done.
Re: Should Fred Van Vleet be an all-star?
-
AussieCeltic
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,019
- And1: 24,234
- Joined: Jan 02, 2014
-
Re: Should Fred Van Vleet be an all-star?
everdiso wrote:AussieCeltic wrote:everdiso wrote:Fred league ranks, before tonight:
Raptor #5
EPM #9
TPA #15
DPM #26
Lebron #30
The question isn't whether he should make the all-star team, but which All-NBA team he should make.
Going by RAPTOR then Derrick White, Steven Adams, D-Lo, Alex Caruso, Derrick Rose, Marcus Smart, Alec Burks, Jarred Vanderbilt are all All Star players.
Going by EPM then Javale Mcgee, Gary Payton II, Isiah Hartenstein, Kevin Love, Mike Muscala should all be all stars.
And so on and so forth.
Look he’s a fringe all star but not even close to all nba.
1. None of those guys are at the top of ALL the metrics like Fred is
2. Yes it's easy for small-role small-minutes to put up gaudy impact metrics. This is irrelevant to Fred, who plays the most minutes in the league, as a primary ballhandler.
Pretty much all those guys are playing large mins aside from Hartenstein and Muscala.
He’s not an All NBA guy, no matter how much you want it to happen. I’ll bet my house that he won’t make all nba this season.
LaLover11 wrote:I bet you $100 Mavs beat the Celtics


