E-Balla wrote:Buckeye-NBAFan wrote:E-Balla wrote:Like I said a not so thinly veiled attempt at defending western imperialism.
China is literally building man made islands to claim other countries' territorial waters and one since deleted tweet by a private citizen makes America the Imperialist, lol, okay.
The point was to point out the size of the "offense" and response. It's not like Morey tweeted that the People's Republic of China has killed tens of millions Chinese citizens since it's founding in 1949, even though he could because it's true.
Then continue on you'll get no defense from me. This is one of those issues where no side looks good. Prior to your edit I was about to go in though because you might need to learn the history of Hong Kong if you want to know why a defense of Hong Kong is a defense of imperialism.
Also I'm not defending China they're reaching into Africa now as we speak to do the same thing European powers have been doing for hundreds of years.
Lol, no side looks good. The side of free speech doesn't look good, got it.
Defending the right of the citizens of Hong Kong to self-determination is not a defense of imperialism. It has nothing to do with imperialism. The current Chinese government exists because it violently overthrew the KMT, you might as well argue the PRC is illegitimate because of that so they have no right to Hong Kong in the first place. But none of that has anything to do with what's going on in Hong Kong today.
The irony is, you could argue the PRC wouldn't exist without Imperialism. The USSR helped PRC after WWII, and the US shielded the PRC during the war, otherwise they might not have even been capable of violently overthrowing the existing Chinese government. Not to mention the Japanese invasion weakening the government in the first place.