FashionedYoung wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:hugepatsfan wrote:
Your logic is absurd. I don't even think they should play Tatum. But the idea that they won so everything worked is dumb. They were down 15 but still won... so they should go down 15 next game because it worked? Curry shot terribly for the first few games and they won... so he should throw shots over the backboard because him missing shots worked?
The idea that they shouldn't be evaluating their rotations/plays/scheme/etc. and trying to improve is preposterous.
He won't address none of that because he's being "objective" lmao
Must've struck a nerve.
Funny how you ignored that they also agree they shouldn't play Tatum.
Nah it's just funny watching you crash out for Kerr lmfao















