Non-Lakers and Non-Grizzlies Fans - Give your best shot

Moderators: bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285, Clav, ken6199, Domejandro

dingclancy
Analyst
Posts: 3,335
And1: 90
Joined: Feb 28, 2004
Contact:

Non-Lakers and Non-Grizzlies Fans - Give your best shot 

Post#1 » by dingclancy » Sat Feb 9, 2008 12:27 pm

There is much talk about the "rape" trade involving the Lakers and the Grizzlies. While the trade can be termed as lopsided - I am interested if fans of other teams can actually make an alternative offer to the Lakers package.

Per Chris Wallace - the parameters are: Expiring Contracts - Picks and Undrafted Assets - Trading GM is willing to go over Luxury Tax. (So do not offer Marion for Gasol lol!). Lemme see!
Image
User avatar
667Club
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,357
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 12, 2006

 

Post#2 » by 667Club » Sat Feb 9, 2008 12:29 pm

It's not just a regular rape, it's the rape of Nankin. Have you ever seen such a lopsided trade ?
dingclancy
Analyst
Posts: 3,335
And1: 90
Joined: Feb 28, 2004
Contact:

 

Post#3 » by dingclancy » Sat Feb 9, 2008 12:32 pm

I am not defending the trade - I actually am gloating having such a lopsided trade for my team. I am just interested if other fans who think that it is lopsided can actually make a better offer given the parameters,
Image
User avatar
farzi
RealGM
Posts: 12,485
And1: 5
Joined: Dec 20, 2007

 

Post#4 » by farzi » Sat Feb 9, 2008 12:34 pm

dingclancy wrote:I am not defending the trade - I actually am gloating having such a lopsided trade for my team. I am just interested if other fans who think that it is lopsided can actually make a better offer given the parameters,


3 teams gave better offers, but were denied.
jax98
RealGM
Posts: 36,697
And1: 3,015
Joined: Aug 31, 2003

 

Post#5 » by jax98 » Sat Feb 9, 2008 12:43 pm

It's funny how Memphis declined a deal last year that could have given them over $13M worth of expiring contracts, Andres Nocioni and a lottery pick and they settled for $9M, Javaris Crittenton and some very late 1st rounders.
Alex_De_Large
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,718
And1: 45
Joined: May 05, 2007

 

Post#6 » by Alex_De_Large » Sat Feb 9, 2008 1:11 pm

grizzlies are idiots, they could have a much better deal, there are better rookies than criteton and better picks than the lakers give. for ex. bulls can give duhon and tyrus thomas who are better than critecton and they're picks are definitely better than the lakers ones.
dingclancy
Analyst
Posts: 3,335
And1: 90
Joined: Feb 28, 2004
Contact:

 

Post#7 » by dingclancy » Sat Feb 9, 2008 1:36 pm

Bulls do not want to go over the luxury tax.
Image
UDRIH14
General Manager
Posts: 7,757
And1: 662
Joined: Jan 27, 2005
Location: Australia

 

Post#8 » by UDRIH14 » Sat Feb 9, 2008 1:40 pm

look at what the offer was from the lakers for pau

now would any other team or playoff team that comes up with the same offer or better for miller, would grizzlies trade?

the gm of grizzlies said it himself, he thinks grizzlies can go places with miller, he is tryin to boast millers stock and get a better deal out for him.

So why is pau any less of a player than miller? its not like miller was a franchise player or a player who can turn around a teams woes....

he made a stupid trade to the lakers for peanuts, now he wants to get more out of miller? it shouldve been the other way around.
AJ:"I'm Western Conference," he said. "I'm Popovich. I'm for him, for Texas and for the Spurs."
jax98
RealGM
Posts: 36,697
And1: 3,015
Joined: Aug 31, 2003

 

Post#9 » by jax98 » Sat Feb 9, 2008 1:51 pm

U-Borat wrote:Key word: last year.


Absolutely. All I'm saying is the Grizzlies waited too long to make a move regarding Pau.

dingclancy wrote:Bulls do not want to go over the luxury tax.


Somewhat correct.

Had the Grizzlies agreed to the proposed trade last season, Bulls owner Jerry Reinsdorf wouldn't have had a problem paying LuxTax since we at the time were winners and added an inside scorer. But he has never been fond of spending money on the NBA. He's a baseball fan first and formost, and that makes the Bulls a 2nd priority..

We need a new owner. Anyone have around $600M to spend?
Alex_De_Large
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,718
And1: 45
Joined: May 05, 2007

 

Post#10 » by Alex_De_Large » Sat Feb 9, 2008 2:18 pm

OK THEN bulls are also morons.
User avatar
dockingsched
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 56,660
And1: 23,966
Joined: Aug 02, 2005
     

 

Post#11 » by dockingsched » Sat Feb 9, 2008 2:23 pm

farzi wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



3 teams gave better offers, but were denied.


list them.
"We must try not to sink beneath our anguish, Harry, but battle on." - Dumbledore
Phobo_Phile
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,746
And1: 398
Joined: Jun 12, 2007
Location: Grand Rapids
       

 

Post#12 » by Phobo_Phile » Sat Feb 9, 2008 2:24 pm

Morten Jensen wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

We need a new owner. Anyone have around $600M to spend?


Wierd Al Yankovic wrote: I do Bill Gates' taxes, he calls me money for short
AceDegenerate
Banned User
Posts: 4,852
And1: 1
Joined: Aug 01, 2002

 

Post#13 » by AceDegenerate » Sat Feb 9, 2008 3:30 pm

I was convinced I'd never see a more lopsided trade than the Boston/McHale trade.

The Lakers proved me wrong.
jefe
General Manager
Posts: 8,304
And1: 744
Joined: Apr 27, 2005
Location: memphis

 

Post#14 » by jefe » Sat Feb 9, 2008 3:41 pm

Off the top of my head, only three teams could have potentially put together a better package:

Washington - something built around Jamison's massive expiring and one of their young talents like Young, Pech, etc. Wallace said that Kwame was the largest expiring he could find, so presumably Washington was interested in parting with Jamison (or Jamison has a player option for next year?)

Miami - something built around Davis's & Jwill's expirings and one of their young talents, probably Cook moreso than Wright because Wright is an expiring himself this year IIRC. Obviously Miami would have no interest in parting with their lottery pick this year and luxury tax would be an issue, too.

Orlando - they would be able to cobble together a handful of expirings that might be equivalent to Kwame's, but what young asset could they include? Reddick, the rights to Vazquez, and/or Augustine (is he even still on the roster?) wouldn't cut it IMO.


Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong on any of this: but looking at those three teams, I don't see the Grizz and any of them coming to an agreement that provides everything both parties would be looking for.
User avatar
e in boulder
Junior
Posts: 439
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 24, 2007
Location: cambridge, ma

 

Post#15 » by e in boulder » Sat Feb 9, 2008 3:42 pm

Suprised by this senseless trade for the Grizzlies? Yes.
As surprised as I was when I found out Chris Wallace had a GM job again? No.
canoner
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,722
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 21, 2004

 

Post#16 » by canoner » Sun Feb 10, 2008 2:56 am

Stupid Grizz. This is arguable more stupid than Twolves trading away KG.
User avatar
Kobay
General Manager
Posts: 9,404
And1: 5
Joined: May 01, 2007

 

Post#17 » by Kobay » Sun Feb 10, 2008 3:23 am

lol @ jeoulous fans. They traded for 9 mil expiring, young version of pau gasol (his brother marc gasol) , and a young prospect Jcritt + picks. go a head list a trade that would actually happen, list teams that don't mind paying tax and can offer their picks for future as well.
andyo
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,341
And1: 447
Joined: Aug 18, 2006
 

 

Post#18 » by andyo » Sun Feb 10, 2008 3:31 am

The lakers win this easily even if one of the prospects given turn out to be a borderline all-star given the situation they are in with Kobe, and the fact that they need to win now.
Alex_De_Large
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,718
And1: 45
Joined: May 05, 2007

 

Post#19 » by Alex_De_Large » Sun Feb 10, 2008 3:34 am

And who say Marc Gasol will play in the NBA? maybe he comes after 6 years, Scola did come 3 or 4 years later.
Jules Winnfield
Banned User
Posts: 1,157
And1: 1
Joined: Jul 17, 2006

 

Post#20 » by Jules Winnfield » Sun Feb 10, 2008 3:57 am

It doesn't matter. The Grizzlies explained what they were trying to accomplish and a deal got done.

Return to The General Board