Non-Lakers and Non-Grizzlies Fans - Give your best shot
Moderators: bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285, Clav, ken6199, Domejandro
Non-Lakers and Non-Grizzlies Fans - Give your best shot
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,335
- And1: 90
- Joined: Feb 28, 2004
- Contact:
Non-Lakers and Non-Grizzlies Fans - Give your best shot
There is much talk about the "rape" trade involving the Lakers and the Grizzlies. While the trade can be termed as lopsided - I am interested if fans of other teams can actually make an alternative offer to the Lakers package.
Per Chris Wallace - the parameters are: Expiring Contracts - Picks and Undrafted Assets - Trading GM is willing to go over Luxury Tax. (So do not offer Marion for Gasol lol!). Lemme see!
Per Chris Wallace - the parameters are: Expiring Contracts - Picks and Undrafted Assets - Trading GM is willing to go over Luxury Tax. (So do not offer Marion for Gasol lol!). Lemme see!

-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,335
- And1: 90
- Joined: Feb 28, 2004
- Contact:
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 7,757
- And1: 662
- Joined: Jan 27, 2005
- Location: Australia
look at what the offer was from the lakers for pau
now would any other team or playoff team that comes up with the same offer or better for miller, would grizzlies trade?
the gm of grizzlies said it himself, he thinks grizzlies can go places with miller, he is tryin to boast millers stock and get a better deal out for him.
So why is pau any less of a player than miller? its not like miller was a franchise player or a player who can turn around a teams woes....
he made a stupid trade to the lakers for peanuts, now he wants to get more out of miller? it shouldve been the other way around.
now would any other team or playoff team that comes up with the same offer or better for miller, would grizzlies trade?
the gm of grizzlies said it himself, he thinks grizzlies can go places with miller, he is tryin to boast millers stock and get a better deal out for him.
So why is pau any less of a player than miller? its not like miller was a franchise player or a player who can turn around a teams woes....
he made a stupid trade to the lakers for peanuts, now he wants to get more out of miller? it shouldve been the other way around.
AJ:"I'm Western Conference," he said. "I'm Popovich. I'm for him, for Texas and for the Spurs."
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 36,697
- And1: 3,015
- Joined: Aug 31, 2003
U-Borat wrote:Key word: last year.
Absolutely. All I'm saying is the Grizzlies waited too long to make a move regarding Pau.
dingclancy wrote:Bulls do not want to go over the luxury tax.
Somewhat correct.
Had the Grizzlies agreed to the proposed trade last season, Bulls owner Jerry Reinsdorf wouldn't have had a problem paying LuxTax since we at the time were winners and added an inside scorer. But he has never been fond of spending money on the NBA. He's a baseball fan first and formost, and that makes the Bulls a 2nd priority..
We need a new owner. Anyone have around $600M to spend?
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,718
- And1: 45
- Joined: May 05, 2007
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,746
- And1: 398
- Joined: Jun 12, 2007
- Location: Grand Rapids
-
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,304
- And1: 744
- Joined: Apr 27, 2005
- Location: memphis
Off the top of my head, only three teams could have potentially put together a better package:
Washington - something built around Jamison's massive expiring and one of their young talents like Young, Pech, etc. Wallace said that Kwame was the largest expiring he could find, so presumably Washington was interested in parting with Jamison (or Jamison has a player option for next year?)
Miami - something built around Davis's & Jwill's expirings and one of their young talents, probably Cook moreso than Wright because Wright is an expiring himself this year IIRC. Obviously Miami would have no interest in parting with their lottery pick this year and luxury tax would be an issue, too.
Orlando - they would be able to cobble together a handful of expirings that might be equivalent to Kwame's, but what young asset could they include? Reddick, the rights to Vazquez, and/or Augustine (is he even still on the roster?) wouldn't cut it IMO.
Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong on any of this: but looking at those three teams, I don't see the Grizz and any of them coming to an agreement that provides everything both parties would be looking for.
Washington - something built around Jamison's massive expiring and one of their young talents like Young, Pech, etc. Wallace said that Kwame was the largest expiring he could find, so presumably Washington was interested in parting with Jamison (or Jamison has a player option for next year?)
Miami - something built around Davis's & Jwill's expirings and one of their young talents, probably Cook moreso than Wright because Wright is an expiring himself this year IIRC. Obviously Miami would have no interest in parting with their lottery pick this year and luxury tax would be an issue, too.
Orlando - they would be able to cobble together a handful of expirings that might be equivalent to Kwame's, but what young asset could they include? Reddick, the rights to Vazquez, and/or Augustine (is he even still on the roster?) wouldn't cut it IMO.
Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong on any of this: but looking at those three teams, I don't see the Grizz and any of them coming to an agreement that provides everything both parties would be looking for.
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 1,157
- And1: 1
- Joined: Jul 17, 2006