Hughes: Playing Hard Not Always Smart
Moderators: bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285, Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake
Hughes: Playing Hard Not Always Smart
- dockingsched
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 56,660
- And1: 23,966
- Joined: Aug 02, 2005
-
Hughes: Playing Hard Not Always Smart
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/chi- ... 9439.story
talk about misleading title. larry hughes never says that "playing hard not always smart". he simply says that sometimes simply playing hard isn't enough, you have execute too. i know its the title of the column but damn, realgm's wiretap goes down the drain with every day that passes.
talk about misleading title. larry hughes never says that "playing hard not always smart". he simply says that sometimes simply playing hard isn't enough, you have execute too. i know its the title of the column but damn, realgm's wiretap goes down the drain with every day that passes.
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 22,667
- And1: 1,094
- Joined: May 29, 2003
- Location: Cliff Levingston is omnipresent.
-
Seems like a disguised shot at the coaching staff. Pretty much all Boylan ever says about the team is that "we didn't have energy" or "we didn't play hard enough." Nor him or Skiles shave hardly ever mentioned anything about "our game plan wasn't a good one tonight" or "we weren't able to exploit what their defense was doing." Cliff Levingston thinks that this is basically a way of Larry saying "there's many more things we could be doing to attack offensively or defensively but we're not."
- FakeScreenName123
- RealGM
- Posts: 14,176
- And1: 5,113
- Joined: Jul 09, 2003
- Location: Town
Cliff Levingston wrote:Seems like a disguised shot at the coaching staff. Pretty much all Boylan ever says about the team is that "we didn't have energy" or "we didn't play hard enough." Nor him or Skiles shave hardly ever mentioned anything about "our game plan wasn't a good one tonight" or "we weren't able to exploit what their defense was doing." Cliff Levingston thinks that this is basically a way of Larry saying "there's many more things we could be doing to attack offensively or defensively but we're not."

- C'mon Cavs
- Starter
- Posts: 2,053
- And1: 5
- Joined: Jan 21, 2008
Oh my god...Hughes is a walking excuse. Pretty soon he'll be saying that the smart thing to do is sit on the bench because you can get injured when you play on the court.
Everyone will be here saying "'You know what...Larry Hughes is right. If you dont play you cant get hurt, so he has a point".
This guy is a bum and a complete loser. Dont listen to anything he says. Everything he says is an excuse.
Everyone will be here saying "'You know what...Larry Hughes is right. If you dont play you cant get hurt, so he has a point".
This guy is a bum and a complete loser. Dont listen to anything he says. Everything he says is an excuse.
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 26,572
- And1: 4,202
- Joined: Jan 21, 2005
- Location: Dallas
C'mon Cavs wrote:Oh my god...Hughes is a walking excuse. Pretty soon he'll be saying that the smart thing to do is sit on the bench because you can get injured when you play on the court.
Everyone will be here saying "'You know what...Larry Hughes is right. If you dont play you cant get hurt, so he has a point".
This guy is a bum and a complete loser. Dont listen to anything he says. Everything he says is an excuse.
I don't like the guy, but read the article. The title is misleading which is what the OP was getting at.
- dockingsched
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 56,660
- And1: 23,966
- Joined: Aug 02, 2005
-
CBS7 wrote:Its not just the wiretap either, it was the title of the article.
yeah i wrote that in my initial post. realgm doesn't have to copy the title of the article, and i'm pretty sure its common to either put the title, good quote, or something else in the wiretap. if realgm always puts the title of the article then my apologies about the wiretap, if it doesn't, then change the headline.
edit: two examples of what i'm talking about currently on the wiretap. the dirk article doesn't have the title in the wiretap, instead its some question. the walsh article title is slightly altered, something that should have been done here.
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,955
- And1: 2,235
- Joined: Feb 02, 2006
- Location: Nova Scotia
-
"Playing hard not always smart" leads the reader to think that playing hard isn't a smart thing to do in all situations.
"Playing hard, not always smart" leads the reader to think that the team is playing hard, but not consistently playing smart.
The title is simply missing a comma, but it makes all the difference.
"Playing hard, not always smart" leads the reader to think that the team is playing hard, but not consistently playing smart.
The title is simply missing a comma, but it makes all the difference.
- dockingsched
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 56,660
- And1: 23,966
- Joined: Aug 02, 2005
-
yeah, would have made all the difference.
they also could have used the secondary title.
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/chi- ... 9439.story
"Hughes: Execution is most important factor". thats a lot closer to what hughes said, though he never says whats more important, playing hard or playing smart. he just says u need both.
they also could have used the secondary title.
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/chi- ... 9439.story
"Hughes: Execution is most important factor". thats a lot closer to what hughes said, though he never says whats more important, playing hard or playing smart. he just says u need both.
"We must try not to sink beneath our anguish, Harry, but battle on." - Dumbledore
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 22,667
- And1: 1,094
- Joined: May 29, 2003
- Location: Cliff Levingston is omnipresent.
-
dcash4 wrote:"Hughes: Execution is most important factor". thats a lot closer to what hughes said, though he never says whats more important, playing hard or playing smart. he just says u need both.
Yep, and he basically said that the Bulls have the "playing hard" part down but not the "playing smart" part down, quite obviously.