70sFan wrote:Thanks for the numbers.
You're welcome!
Question: Has any superstar ever been on worse teams for their entire prime than Maravich?
Moderators: Clyde Frazier, Doctor MJ, trex_8063, penbeast0, PaulieWal
70sFan wrote:Thanks for the numbers.
70sFan wrote:ty 4191 wrote:70sFan wrote:
Pete played on worse teams, so he basically didn't play in the playoffs and when he did, he faced 1970s Celtics. I don't think Iverson would fare much better than him in his place, even though he's a better player than Maravich.
I don't think people realize that these 1999-05 Philly teams did reasonably well without Iverson.
Primes (stats include playoffs):
76ers record without Iverson, 99'-05': 36-53 (.404)
76ers record with Iverson: 293-223 (.568)
Hawks/Jazz record without Maravich, 73'-78': 26-47 (.353)
Hawks/Jazz record with Maravich: 192-233 (.452)
Makes me wonder.....has any NBA Superstar ever been on worse teams in their prime than Maravich?
Thanks for the numbers.
ty 4191 wrote:70sFan wrote:Thanks for the numbers.
You're welcome!
Question: Has any superstar ever been on worse teams for their entire prime than Maravich?
ty 4191 wrote:HeartBreakKid wrote:That's true, but not much proof in his favor either way.
Is Maravich the most overrated superstar of the 1970's?
Has anyone played on worse teams (over the course of their entire prime) than Pistol Pete?