OhayoKD wrote:Doctor MJ wrote:Him.
But Rui. Not to mention Vanderbilt different
Okay Vando was really good game 1 but he’s been closer to the worst of our rotation than the best so far (Altho he’s been decent)
Moderators: Clyde Frazier, Doctor MJ, trex_8063, penbeast0, PaulieWal
OhayoKD wrote:Doctor MJ wrote:Him.
But Rui. Not to mention Vanderbilt different
Bruh Man wrote:Doctor MJ wrote:Colbinii wrote:
What do you think of the parallels between Reeves and Manu?
I can't say I really see it yet, but I love Reaves composure out there for such a new guy. He's just an incredible find by the Lakers, and this is on the back of Caruso. It really feels bizarre because the Lakers have never really been known for scouting or fringe player development.
Lakers have drafted well with late/undrafted players over the years Reaves/Caruso/Kuzma/Nance/Hart/Gasol hard to get good players when your rarely in the lottery. Even their first round picks: Ingram was the right choice, Randle was solid, Russel could have been Booker but a lot of teams passed up on him, and Lonzo was the biggest fumble but he was Magic's guy.
Doctor MJ wrote:Colbinii wrote:Doctor MJ wrote:Him.
What do you think of the parallels between Reeves and Manu?
I can't say I really see it yet, but I love Reaves composure out there for such a new guy. He's just an incredible find by the Lakers, and this is on the back of Caruso. It really feels bizarre because the Lakers have never really been known for scouting or fringe player development.
Bruh Man wrote:Doctor MJ wrote:Colbinii wrote:
What do you think of the parallels between Reeves and Manu?
I can't say I really see it yet, but I love Reaves composure out there for such a new guy. He's just an incredible find by the Lakers, and this is on the back of Caruso. It really feels bizarre because the Lakers have never really been known for scouting or fringe player development.
Lakers have drafted well with late/undrafted players over the years Reaves/Caruso/Kuzma/Nance/Hart/Gasol hard to get good players when your rarely in the lottery. Even their first round picks: Ingram was the right choice, Randle was solid, Russel could have been Booker but a lot of teams passed up on him, and Lonzo was the biggest fumble but he was Magic's guy.
Bruh Man wrote:Doctor MJ wrote:Colbinii wrote:
What do you think of the parallels between Reeves and Manu?
I can't say I really see it yet, but I love Reaves composure out there for such a new guy. He's just an incredible find by the Lakers, and this is on the back of Caruso. It really feels bizarre because the Lakers have never really been known for scouting or fringe player development.
Lakers have drafted well with late/undrafted players over the years Reaves/Caruso/Kuzma/Nance/Hart/Gasol hard to get good players when your rarely in the lottery. Even their first round picks: Ingram was the right choice, Randle was solid, Russel could have been Booker but a lot of teams passed up on him, and Lonzo was the biggest fumble but he was Magic's guy.