Who is the 3rd-best player on the '23 Lakers presently?

Moderators: Clyde Frazier, Doctor MJ, trex_8063, penbeast0, PaulieWal

3rd-best player on the '23 Lakers (assuming AD and LeBron 1/2, obv [state if you disagree])?

D'Angelo Russell
5
11%
Austin Reaves
34
77%
Jared Vanderbilt
2
5%
Dennis Schroeder
1
2%
Other
2
5%
 
Total votes: 44

MyUniBroDavis
General Manager
Posts: 7,827
And1: 5,032
Joined: Jan 14, 2013

Re: Who is the 3rd-best player on the '23 Lakers presently? 

Post#21 » by MyUniBroDavis » Thu May 4, 2023 6:03 am

OhayoKD wrote:
Doctor MJ wrote:Him.

But Rui. Not to mention Vanderbilt different


Okay Vando was really good game 1 but he’s been closer to the worst of our rotation than the best so far (Altho he’s been decent)
Colbinii
RealGM
Posts: 34,243
And1: 21,854
Joined: Feb 13, 2013

Re: Who is the 3rd-best player on the '23 Lakers presently? 

Post#22 » by Colbinii » Thu May 4, 2023 12:26 pm

Bruh Man wrote:
Doctor MJ wrote:
Colbinii wrote:
What do you think of the parallels between Reeves and Manu?


I can't say I really see it yet, but I love Reaves composure out there for such a new guy. He's just an incredible find by the Lakers, and this is on the back of Caruso. It really feels bizarre because the Lakers have never really been known for scouting or fringe player development.

Lakers have drafted well with late/undrafted players over the years Reaves/Caruso/Kuzma/Nance/Hart/Gasol hard to get good players when your rarely in the lottery. Even their first round picks: Ingram was the right choice, Randle was solid, Russel could have been Booker but a lot of teams passed up on him, and Lonzo was the biggest fumble but he was Magic's guy.


Lonzo wasn't even a fumble.

I remember watching a couple Ben Taylor videos on him. He was supremely talented and made 99 Percentile plays as a playmaker and defender.

He just couldn't put it all together and when he did, we found out his body couldn't hold up.
HeartBreakKid
RealGM
Posts: 22,395
And1: 18,827
Joined: Mar 08, 2012
     

Re: Who is the 3rd-best player on the '23 Lakers presently? 

Post#23 » by HeartBreakKid » Thu May 4, 2023 2:21 pm

Doctor MJ wrote:
Colbinii wrote:
Doctor MJ wrote:Him.


What do you think of the parallels between Reeves and Manu?


I can't say I really see it yet, but I love Reaves composure out there for such a new guy. He's just an incredible find by the Lakers, and this is on the back of Caruso. It really feels bizarre because the Lakers have never really been known for scouting or fringe player development.

They've gotten good roleplayers nearly every year for the last decade now. Bruhman broke it down.
Fadeaway_J
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 28,430
And1: 7,636
Joined: Jul 25, 2016
Location: Kingston, Jamaica
   

Re: Who is the 3rd-best player on the '23 Lakers presently? 

Post#24 » by Fadeaway_J » Thu May 4, 2023 2:34 pm

Bruh Man wrote:
Doctor MJ wrote:
Colbinii wrote:
What do you think of the parallels between Reeves and Manu?


I can't say I really see it yet, but I love Reaves composure out there for such a new guy. He's just an incredible find by the Lakers, and this is on the back of Caruso. It really feels bizarre because the Lakers have never really been known for scouting or fringe player development.

Lakers have drafted well with late/undrafted players over the years Reaves/Caruso/Kuzma/Nance/Hart/Gasol hard to get good players when your rarely in the lottery. Even their first round picks: Ingram was the right choice, Randle was solid, Russel could have been Booker but a lot of teams passed up on him, and Lonzo was the biggest fumble but he was Magic's guy.

Yeah that's pretty much the only thing they've done well in the last several years :lol:
Doctor MJ
Senior Mod
Senior Mod
Posts: 53,247
And1: 22,253
Joined: Mar 10, 2005
Location: Cali
     

Re: Who is the 3rd-best player on the '23 Lakers presently? 

Post#25 » by Doctor MJ » Thu May 4, 2023 3:09 pm

Bruh Man wrote:
Doctor MJ wrote:
Colbinii wrote:
What do you think of the parallels between Reeves and Manu?


I can't say I really see it yet, but I love Reaves composure out there for such a new guy. He's just an incredible find by the Lakers, and this is on the back of Caruso. It really feels bizarre because the Lakers have never really been known for scouting or fringe player development.

Lakers have drafted well with late/undrafted players over the years Reaves/Caruso/Kuzma/Nance/Hart/Gasol hard to get good players when your rarely in the lottery. Even their first round picks: Ingram was the right choice, Randle was solid, Russel could have been Booker but a lot of teams passed up on him, and Lonzo was the biggest fumble but he was Magic's guy.


Eh, okay point taken. It's just that for the most part "the Lakers drafted well" means "he really ended up helping the team the Lakers trade him to as they focused on getting superstars".
Getting ready for the RealGM 100 on the PC Board

Come join the WNBA Board if you're a fan!

Return to Player Comparisons