Best big man in crunch time?

Moderators: Clyde Frazier, Doctor MJ, trex_8063, penbeast0, PaulieWal

Silk Wilkes
Banned User
Posts: 10,533
And1: 10
Joined: Aug 28, 2004
Location: In between a pimp and a hard place

 

Post#21 » by Silk Wilkes » Mon Mar 24, 2008 11:24 pm

ponder276 wrote:Dirk - 44.7
Bosh - 39.7
Amare - 38.7
Yao - 36.8
Boozer - 36.4
Al Jefferson - 33.9
Antawn Jamison - 30.6
Duncan - 28.8
Garnett - 22.6
Dwight - 14.9


Chris actually tries to do the right thing in the crunch as of late. His first few years he would settle for the jumper but lately he heads straight to the rim and picks up free points.
User avatar
Hendrix
RealGM
Posts: 17,030
And1: 3,662
Joined: May 30, 2007
Location: London, Ontario

 

Post#22 » by Hendrix » Mon Mar 24, 2008 11:39 pm

Youngblood wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



Chris actually tries to do the right thing in the crunch as of late. His first few years he would settle for the jumper but lately he heads straight to the rim and picks up free points.


Yeah I was going to mention him, since nobody else has. For a big man he does quite a bit of scoring in the crunch at better efficeincy then a lot of the others, and has became pretty good at reading defences, and passing. Comes up with some pretty big blocks down the stretch too.
oak2455 wrote:Do understand English???
User avatar
BrooklynBulls
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 32,734
And1: 2,655
Joined: May 13, 2007
Location: Avidly reading WillPenney.com
Contact:

 

Post#23 » by BrooklynBulls » Mon Mar 24, 2008 11:41 pm

I'll take Boozer. Boozer has several qualities that I like better than the other candidates. He doesn't turn the ball over much, he shoots FT's quite well, he plays within 15 feet at all times, and therefore shoots a higher percentage than most bigmen, and he is an absolute bear on the offensive glass. If he misses from within 5 feet, I'd say he's got a 30% chance of squeezing the board and having another shot at it.
User avatar
TMACFORMVP
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 18,947
And1: 161
Joined: Jun 30, 2006
Location: 9th Seed

 

Post#24 » by TMACFORMVP » Mon Mar 24, 2008 11:41 pm

I'd take Duncan, you can count on him on the defensive end and know you'll get a good shot on the offensive end.
User avatar
Hendrix
RealGM
Posts: 17,030
And1: 3,662
Joined: May 30, 2007
Location: London, Ontario

 

Post#25 » by Hendrix » Mon Mar 24, 2008 11:57 pm

Here's the current stats for most of the people mentioned so far.

Code: Select all


Points     PP/48   FG%.   RP48   BP48   AP48     
Nowitzki   44.7   .429     14.6   2.2.   3.5   
Bosh       39.7   .527     11.7   1.9.   4.2
Stodamire  38.7   .509     16.8   1.3.   1.3   
Boozer     36.4   .569     18.9   1.4.   3.3   
Duncan     28.8   .536     13.5   2.3.   4.2
Garnett    22.6   .421     13.1   1.6.   2.6
West       19.6   .320     12.6   1.4.   2.3
Howard     14.9   .438     17.2   3.8.   0.8


PP/48=points per 48 minutes
RP48=Rebounds per 48 minutes
BP48=Blocks per 48 minutes
AP48=Assits per 48 minutes
oak2455 wrote:Do understand English???
Nebroc
Senior
Posts: 615
And1: 0
Joined: Aug 08, 2006

 

Post#26 » by Nebroc » Tue Mar 25, 2008 12:08 am

Amare never hits fts when it matters. And KG is one of the worst superstars in crunch time ever. Give me Duncan.
User avatar
Teddy KGB
General Manager
Posts: 9,306
And1: 1
Joined: Nov 03, 2006
Location: London, United Kingdom
Contact:

 

Post#27 » by Teddy KGB » Tue Mar 25, 2008 1:05 am

wow 45/12 :P
Formerly ss_maverick, JHos Hydro
User avatar
BrooklynBulls
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 32,734
And1: 2,655
Joined: May 13, 2007
Location: Avidly reading WillPenney.com
Contact:

 

Post#28 » by BrooklynBulls » Tue Mar 25, 2008 1:40 am

Hendrix wrote:Here's the current stats for most of the people mentioned so far.

Code: Select all


Points     PP/48   FG%.   RP48   BP48   AP48     
Nowitzki   44.7   .429     14.6   2.2.   3.5   
Bosh       39.7   .527     11.7   1.9.   4.2
Stodamire  38.7   .509     16.8   1.3.   1.3   
Boozer     36.4   .569     18.9   1.4.   3.3   
Duncan     28.8   .536     13.5   2.3.   4.2
Garnett    22.6   .421     13.1   1.6.   2.6
West       19.6   .320     12.6   1.4.   2.3
Howard     14.9   .438     17.2   3.8.   0.8



Thanks a ton for compiling these stats, I know it must have been a bit of a pain.

Anyway, I think Boozer is a good choice given these stats. He not only has the highest FG%, but the highest rebound rate. He even blocks shots at an acceptable rate (never thought I'd see that in any Boozer stat).
He assists at a high rate, and he's a decent FT shooter.

The bottom line is that he is dominant in efficiency and rebounding, while being acceptable to good in all other areas. People don't watch him enough. He's a great clutch player.
studcrackers
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 52,226
And1: 6,100
Joined: Oct 31, 2004
Location: Getting hit in the head
         

 

Post#29 » by studcrackers » Tue Mar 25, 2008 4:57 am

is a per 48 stat for a last 2 minute really the best thing to weigh these guys on? i like seeing dirk at the top of that list but im not sure if per 48 is the best you can do
Jugs wrote: I saw two buttholes
User avatar
kandiking
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,551
And1: 1
Joined: Jul 21, 2007

 

Post#30 » by kandiking » Tue Mar 25, 2008 7:09 am

IMO al jefferson should be mentioned before KG in terms of crunch time. also chris bosh is great at stepping up in the 4th.
Vindicater wrote:KWSN-Men is by far my favourite poster on realgm. He just takes so much punishment and just keeps coming back for more.
User avatar
ponder276
Head Coach
Posts: 6,075
And1: 67
Joined: Oct 14, 2007

 

Post#31 » by ponder276 » Tue Mar 25, 2008 9:06 am

studcrackers wrote:is a per 48 stat for a last 2 minute really the best thing to weigh these guys on? i like seeing dirk at the top of that list but im not sure if per 48 is the best you can do

82games.com clutch play stats are for "4th quarter or overtime, less than 5 minutes left, neither team ahead by more than 5 points." Seems like a pretty decent stat.

Here's clutch stats for the whole league btw:
http://www.82games.com/CSORT11.HTM

Slightly OT, but look at the f*cking Spurs:
Ginobili: 41.5 pts/48, .540 fg%
Parker: 29.0 pts/48, .595 fg%
Duncan: 28.8 pts/48, .536 fg%

That is some unbelievably efficient clutch scoring, and we all know they have play great d in crunch time. No wonder they win so many championships.
User avatar
Number34
Analyst
Posts: 3,718
And1: 1
Joined: Jun 11, 2005
Location: Kyogle, N.S.W, Australia

 

Post#32 » by Number34 » Tue Mar 25, 2008 10:28 am

Dirk has been clutch, but during the finals man did he suck a lemon.
Image
User avatar
kingly222
Junior
Posts: 364
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 18, 2004

 

Post#33 » by kingly222 » Tue Mar 25, 2008 2:03 pm

Al Jefferson. Now if his team can only stay close enough for his crunch time play to pay off.

LOL at posters saying Dirk and KG, two players known(whether its true or not) for disappearing in the 4th.
User avatar
Point forward
Head Coach
Posts: 6,200
And1: 285
Joined: May 16, 2007
Location: Eating crow for the rest of my life :D

 

Post#34 » by Point forward » Tue Mar 25, 2008 2:18 pm

For current guys, TD all the way. All-time: Russell (though he sucked from the FT line) and Kareem.
cjx
Head Coach
Posts: 6,170
And1: 6,398
Joined: Aug 03, 2005

 

Post#35 » by cjx » Tue Mar 25, 2008 4:28 pm

The legendary Zelmo Beaty a.k.a. the original "Big Z"!
Equanimity, peace, harmony and conscientiousness, friends
The_Believer
Pro Prospect
Posts: 810
And1: 0
Joined: May 20, 2007
Location: The Bay

 

Post#36 » by The_Believer » Tue Mar 25, 2008 7:33 pm

Definitely not Amare for defense
User avatar
WadeKnicks2010
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,871
And1: 2
Joined: Jan 14, 2008
Location: NYC

 

Post#37 » by WadeKnicks2010 » Tue Mar 25, 2008 8:42 pm

Amare. with his ft shooting and the fact that he's tough to guard under the baket with Nash outside.

Okur. He seems to hit big threes a lot because of what D-Will and Boozer create.
User avatar
Jugoplastika89-90-91
Junior
Posts: 381
And1: 0
Joined: Aug 08, 2006

 

Post#38 » by Jugoplastika89-90-91 » Tue Mar 25, 2008 10:31 pm

Overall Duncan/Rasheed
Ofensively Mehmet Okur. He won so much games in last seconds hiting big shots...

:wink:
ppp000
Pro Prospect
Posts: 920
And1: 0
Joined: Nov 18, 2007

 

Post#39 » by ppp000 » Wed Mar 26, 2008 6:02 am

Baller 24 wrote:KG is the best bet as of right now along with Amare and Duncan. Dirk would be perfect with his shooting range, but I have nothing to see from him yet, its a damn shame to see him choke, he did it the other night against the Lakers, when they had there come back and could of clearly tied. But as of right now KG, Amare, and Duncan are the clear winners.


Right b/c Dirk's two straight 3s in the final minute or so were not clutch, and b/c Dirk didn't make a desperation 3 with 4 secs left after a bad pass from Howard, he's not clutch. Give me a break. Nothing to see from him yet? See 06 Spurs, Suns playoff series, see numerous mav games, see how he has carried the team more times than not in crunchtime. And KG as a "clear" winner in crunchtime? The guy who has a reputation of being the exact opposite (fair or not).

I would say Duncan, he's all around offensively and defensively and he usually makes his FTs in the clutch.
User avatar
NO-KG-AI
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 44,084
And1: 20,035
Joined: Jul 19, 2005
Location: The city of witch doctors, and good ol' pickpockets

 

Post#40 » by NO-KG-AI » Wed Mar 26, 2008 11:15 am

ppp000 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



Right b/c Dirk's two straight 3s in the final minute or so were not clutch, and b/c Dirk didn't make a desperation 3 with 4 secs left after a bad pass from Howard, he's not clutch. Give me a break. Nothing to see from him yet? See 06 Spurs, Suns playoff series, see numerous mav games, see how he has carried the team more times than not in crunchtime. And KG as a "clear" winner in crunchtime? The guy who has a reputation of being the exact opposite (fair or not).

I would say Duncan, he's all around offensively and defensively and he usually makes his FTs in the clutch.


Duncan has been bailed out on missed FT's a lot in the clutch, its his only real flaw.
Doctor MJ wrote:I don't understand why people jump in a thread and say basically, "This thing you're all talking about. I'm too ignorant to know anything about it. Lollerskates!"

Return to Player Comparisons