BombsquadSammy wrote:CoffeeCakez wrote:BombsquadSammy wrote:
This is cherry-picking; you're asserting that because LeBron's had bad games, he isn't clutch. But every player has bad games; Kobe's had plenty, but that doesn't mean he isn't clutch. He went 7-for-22 in G6 against the Celtics in 2008; he shot 19-for-61 (31%) in the last three games of the 2004 Finals; and since you brought up LeBron missing his last three shots at the end of 2016 G7-- a game his team won--, I'll remind you that Kobe missed his last three shots (he shot 6-for-24 overall) in G7 of the 2010 Finals-- a game his team won. And just in case you were going to rebut the observation of poor shooting by reminding us that he has 15 rebounds in that game ('he helped the team in other ways'), I'll rebut that by pointing out that LeBron's 11 points and 11 rebounds in his G7 probably helped his crew out a bit as well.
Do those bad games from Kobe mean he isn't great? Of course not. When you constantly dive into the minutiae to point out every shot LeBron misses (and you really are converging on that level of pettiness when you want to talk about three shots in the context of a game in which he had a triple double and in which his team won the title), it betrays a clear agenda on your part.
thats not what I'm implying by this play by play graphic I posted.user LeBird claimed lebrons free throws sealed the game for the cavs and I simply rebutted that kyrie's dagger 3 and then curry missing two straight threes sealed the win for the cavs. the game was already pretty much over when lebron went 1-2 at the FT line. I simply refuted his false claim, thats all.
That's not all you did, though; you went the extra mile by talking about LeBron's three shots, which had nothing to do with Kyrie's three or LeBron's FTs. It was very important to you to point out that LeBron missed three shots, even though those shots weren't what was being discussed. That's part of the agenda I alluded to.CoffeeCakez wrote:You took this specific post out of context saying that BECAUSE of this ONE instance I think lebron isnt clutch. No sammy, I am not that simple minded. The reason why I don't hold lebron in regard with kobe and MJ when talking about clutchness is due to the data above that Long2s graciously presented us with. have a look
This is what I mean when I talk about cherry-picking. You want people to address the stats Long2s posted, but what about, for instance, this information, which has now been posted three times and which nobody's addressed?:Spoiler:
Now, if we go with THOSE cherry-picked stats, LeBron comes out way ahead.
So, the Kobe-haters will go with one set of data and the LeBron-haters will go with a different set of data, and what does any of it prove? Only that sports data is complex and can be manipulated myriad ways.
It proves that clutch arguments either way are dumb. Vague and cherry picked definition that for some reason only includes scoring and often just the last shot.
Theres a lot more to the game, theres a whole game thats played and there other just as important ( or clutch) moments throughout a game.