zimpy27 wrote:Tracymcgoaty wrote:dcstanley wrote:I'm warming up to swinging for Ingram and Kessler.
AR/Max/Ingram/LBJ/AD
DFS/Kessler
Reddish/Wood/Knecht
Basically have 7 guys you can trust in the playoffs, maybe 8 if Wood gets healthy. Wood can be a reasonable facsimile of Rui if he returns in shape this season.
Max, Kessler, DFS, and AD are all two way guys. Ingram might be a one-way player but he's at least an all-star level talent. He has the tools to be a solid defender with a reduced offensive role.
Ingram and Kessler? How would that work?
I'm cool with Ingram but Kessler would be a mistake.
But I'm interested in why it's a no for DeMar but a yes for Ingram?
DeMar has had better impact stats than Ingram for every season, including this one.
DeMar has shown positive impact stats with Raptors, Spurs, Bulls and now Kings (roughly in the 50th to 80th best range every year the past 5 seasons). He's a reliable impact player and I'd bet he'd be the same on the Lakers.
He got a bad rep because he was played as a number 1 option, when he's really a 3rd option. He's also paid cheaply now.
Well, Ingram is a gamble. You're betting on him reaching another level in his prime, his ability to adapt, and his physical tools. He has the physical tools to be a plus defender in a different role. He could also play fast which the Lakers need, he's more of a 3/4 than a 4/3 and he attempts 6 threes per game (7 per 36), shooting 37% from distance. He has a difficult shot diet so you would hope that more catch and shoot threes and isolation attempts on inferior defenders (since Bron/AD are going to get the tougher matchups) will result in higher efficiency. But like I said, it's a huge gamble. You're betting on Ingram becoming a player that he isn't today.
With Derozan, you know what kind of player he is. He's a good player but not plug and play by any means. I don't think this team can afford a PF that doesn't shoot any threes and struggles on defense. He's also very slow and plodding, last night was a clear indication that the Lakers need athletes around Lebron/AD. Rui scored efficiently last night and was still a disaster because of his defense and lack of athleticism. Sure, Derozan is considerably better than Rui but he doesn't optimize Lebron/AD. The offense would be really clunky and the defense isn't any better.
The Kings situation is an interesting parallel-- Derozan is a superior player to Barnes, like he is Rui, but the Kings are worse with his addition. Fox/Sabonis/Derozan all need adequate spacing to operate on their preferred spots on the floor, similar to Lebron/AD/Derozan.