Iguodala vs Roy revisited
Moderators: Clyde Frazier, Doctor MJ, trex_8063, penbeast0, PaulieWal
Iguodala vs Roy revisited
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 13,474
- And1: 536
- Joined: Feb 18, 2002
- Location: Philadelphia
- Contact:
Iguodala vs Roy revisited
This was brought up a few months ago, when the Blazers were the darlings of the nba, the Sixers at about a .350 winning percentage, and the consensus was Roy was more efficient, didn't turn the ball over, a better leader, and was on an overachieving Blazers team. Since that time, Iguodala has increased his scoring, increased his efficiency, lowered his turnovers, and the Sixers are pushing for a top 5 playoff seed.
I'd still probably take Roy, but it's amazing how close (both their individual production and teams success) they are:
Sixers: 32-34
Blazers: 34-32
They're both practically the same age (roy's 5 months younger).
Roy: 19.7 ppg, 5.0 rpg, 5.8 apg, 1.1 spg, 1.9 topg, 45.6% fg%, 33.2% 3pt%, 1.21 pps
Iguodala: 19.7 ppg, 5.5 rpg, 4.6 apg, 2.0 spg, 2.7 topg, 45% fg%, 31.6% 3pt%, 1.25 pps
The only stat that's really different has been assists, although iguodala did average 5.7 last year when he had more shooters around him.
Which player has had a better individual year? Which teams success is more surprising? Which player has had more impact in their teams success? Which player would you take for the future? Are either of them capable of being the best players on championship teams?
I'd still probably take Roy, but it's amazing how close (both their individual production and teams success) they are:
Sixers: 32-34
Blazers: 34-32
They're both practically the same age (roy's 5 months younger).
Roy: 19.7 ppg, 5.0 rpg, 5.8 apg, 1.1 spg, 1.9 topg, 45.6% fg%, 33.2% 3pt%, 1.21 pps
Iguodala: 19.7 ppg, 5.5 rpg, 4.6 apg, 2.0 spg, 2.7 topg, 45% fg%, 31.6% 3pt%, 1.25 pps
The only stat that's really different has been assists, although iguodala did average 5.7 last year when he had more shooters around him.
Which player has had a better individual year? Which teams success is more surprising? Which player has had more impact in their teams success? Which player would you take for the future? Are either of them capable of being the best players on championship teams?
Re: Iguodala vs Roy revisited
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 36,310
- And1: 8,039
- Joined: May 28, 2007
Re: Iguodala vs Roy revisited
dbodner wrote:This was brought up a few months ago, when the Blazers were the darlings of the nba, the Sixers at about a .350 winning percentage, and the consensus was Roy was more efficient, didn't turn the ball over, a better leader, and was on an overachieving Blazers team. Since that time, Iguodala has increased his scoring, increased his efficiency, lowered his turnovers, and the Sixers are pushing for a top 5 playoff seed.
I'd still probably take Roy, but it's amazing how close (both their individual production and teams success) they are:
Sixers: 32-34
Blazers: 34-32
teams are playing more within their conferences now and that tends to explain the 'tightening' of portland and philly records. Philly is 2 games under .500 and is in the 7th EC playoff spot. Portland is 2 games over .500 and is 7 games out of the WC playoffs.
dbodner wrote:They're both practically the same age (roy's 5 months younger).
Roy: 19.7 ppg, 5.0 rpg, 5.8 apg, 1.1 spg, 1.9 topg, 45.6% fg%, 33.2% 3pt%, 1.21 pps
Iguodala: 19.7 ppg, 5.5 rpg, 4.6 apg, 2.0 spg, 2.7 topg, 45% fg%, 31.6% 3pt%, 1.25 pps
The only stat that's really different has been assists, although iguodala did average 5.7 last year when he had more shooters around him.
Which player has had a better individual year? Which teams success is more surprising? Which player has had more impact in their teams success? Which player would you take for the future? Are either of them capable of being the best players on championship teams?
As a blazer fan, I'd obviously pick Roy. I do think he's having a better year and is the leader of the 3rd youngest team in NBA history that has surprised the league. He's also the focus of opponents defenses every game and is constantly double-teamed and still puts up those numbers.
That's not to say Iggy isn't a fine young player as well. I think Roy is a little better but the gap is small. As a matter of fact, Iggy would probably play well with Roy. They'd be a dynamic duo...

- raps4life~
- General Manager
- Posts: 7,664
- And1: 25
- Joined: Mar 13, 2007
- Location: California
-
- Fitz303
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,198
- And1: 1,839
- Joined: Oct 18, 2006
- Location: Portland
The_Believer wrote:Roy's one of the most overrated players, while Iggy is one of the most underrated. I still think Iggy is better and that Roy isn't a top 30 player in the league; definitely not the superstar ESPN was hyping him to be.
Hahaha.. Dont be too bitter.. Hopefully Baron Davis will get the all star nod next year
- Sixersftw
- RealGM
- Posts: 19,195
- And1: 9,489
- Joined: Dec 23, 2006
- Location: Shoot a 3 you coward
-
lol. I think roy was a bit overrated and iguodala has been a bit underrated this year because of turning down the contract and then being frustrated w/ the team early in the season.
now if I take my homer colored glasses off... they are essentially equals. iguodala has a bit of an edge defensively, roy offensively. Roy's injury history still freaks me out a bit.
now if I take my homer colored glasses off... they are essentially equals. iguodala has a bit of an edge defensively, roy offensively. Roy's injury history still freaks me out a bit.
They say an analytics man doesn't have a heart, but I ran the numbers and nothing can be further from the truth - Sam Hinkie probably
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 36,310
- And1: 8,039
- Joined: May 28, 2007
Sixersftw wrote:lol. I think roy was a bit overrated and iguodala has been a bit underrated this year because of turning down the contract and then being frustrated w/ the team early in the season.
now if I take my homer colored glasses off... they are essentially equals. iguodala has a bit of an edge defensively, roy offensively. Roy's injury history still freaks me out a bit.
roy doesn't have enough of an NBA career to have registered much of an injury history. The talus bone issue last season and the tailbone bruise for 2 games this year.
But that does bring up another point: while Roy is only a half year younger then Iggy, the difference in experience is significant. Iggy has played in over 300 games while roy has only played in 119. Compare Roy at 120 games to Iggy at 120 and there is a substantial advantage for Roy. Obviously this doesn't account for relative physical maturity, but actual NBA experience is very valuable and Iggy has a tremendous advantage there that isn't reflected in a statistical advantage.
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 3,778
- And1: 21
- Joined: Aug 12, 2006
- Location: Rest In Peace Dad
- Contact:
-
- Sixersftw
- RealGM
- Posts: 19,195
- And1: 9,489
- Joined: Dec 23, 2006
- Location: Shoot a 3 you coward
-
Wizenheimer wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
NBA experience is very valuable and Iggy has a tremendous advantage there that isn't reflected in a statistical advantage.
true but experience can factor in many ways. Roy's experience in college counts for something. also, iguodala, over the last year and a half, is learning to be the go to scorer for the first time in life. the strides he's made from december to now are pretty tremendous.
this is and probably will continue to be a really interesting comparison of 2 very good players.
They say an analytics man doesn't have a heart, but I ran the numbers and nothing can be further from the truth - Sam Hinkie probably
-
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 810
- And1: 0
- Joined: May 20, 2007
- Location: The Bay
Wizenheimer wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
LOL...let me guess...warrior fan I presume?
Were you hearing some of the stuff ESPN was saying about Roy? They were saying that he'd be like the next Jordan, he was better than prime Penny, etc??? IMO he won't even be as good as Tony Parker or Manu Ginobili.
Let's look at Roy's stats.
19-4-5... and not top 30 in any stat. Plus, the Blazers are losing now, since they are playing real teams. If Roy were such a good leader, then why can't Roy beat any of the good teams then?...
And don't even bring Baron in this, he's >>>>>>> Roy. Hell, I'd say Kevin Martin and Tony Parker (injured) > Roy.
- farzi
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,485
- And1: 5
- Joined: Dec 20, 2007
The_Believer wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
Were you hearing some of the stuff ESPN was saying about Roy? They were saying that he'd be like the next Jordan, he was better than prime Penny, etc??? IMO he won't even be as good as Tony Parker or Manu Ginobili.
Let's look at Roy's stats.
19-4-5... and not top 30 in any stat. Plus, the Blazers are losing now, since they are playing real teams. If Roy were such a good leader, then why can't Roy beat any of the good teams then?...
And don't even bring Baron in this, he's >>>>>>> Roy. Hell, I'd say Kevin Martin and Tony Parker (injured) > Roy.
Hahahahahahahahaha
You should write for Leno.
Thank you for all the memories BRoy. You were a class act and brought hope to an entire region for 5 years. You will be missed.
- candy for lunch
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,583
- And1: 1
- Joined: Jul 20, 2007