What could this historical team do in today's playoffs?

Moderators: Clyde Frazier, Doctor MJ, trex_8063, penbeast0, PaulieWal

cjx
Head Coach
Posts: 6,170
And1: 6,398
Joined: Aug 03, 2005

What could this historical team do in today's playoffs? 

Post#1 » by cjx » Thu May 15, 2008 4:59 pm

Team H

F Scottie Pippen (prime)
F George McGinnis (prime)
C Robert Parish (prime)
G Sam Cassell (prime)
G Tracy McGrady (prime)
6 Maurice Stokes (prime)
Head coach: Doug Moe

How would this team fare against teams, such as the Celtics, Spurs, and Lakers?
Equanimity, peace, harmony and conscientiousness, friends
penbeast0
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Posts: 30,358
And1: 9,911
Joined: Aug 14, 2004
Location: South Florida
 

 

Post#2 » by penbeast0 » Thu May 15, 2008 5:09 pm

Doug Moe and that kind of talent, that'd be some kind of fun! A bit turnover prone and a prime candidate for an upset but the most talented team in the league and the most likely candidate to win it all.

Think this year's Boston Celtics . . . .
“Most people use statistics like a drunk man uses a lamppost; more for support than illumination,” Andrew Lang.
User avatar
Basileus777
General Manager
Posts: 7,822
And1: 2,051
Joined: Jul 13, 2007
Location: New Jersey
 

 

Post#3 » by Basileus777 » Thu May 15, 2008 5:18 pm

That team would win the championship.
User avatar
kooldude
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,823
And1: 78
Joined: Jul 08, 2007

 

Post#4 » by kooldude » Thu May 15, 2008 5:19 pm

First round exit :)
Warspite wrote:I still would take Mitch (Richmond) over just about any SG playing today. His peak is better than 2011 Kobe and with 90s rules hes better than Wade.


Jordan23Forever wrote:People are delusional.
User avatar
CellarDoor
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 11,146
And1: 972
Joined: May 11, 2008
         

 

Post#5 » by CellarDoor » Thu May 15, 2008 5:34 pm

They'd win it all or fire every single member of the staff.
Alex_De_Large
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,718
And1: 45
Joined: May 05, 2007

 

Post#6 » by Alex_De_Large » Thu May 15, 2008 5:45 pm

Image
User avatar
shawngoat23
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,622
And1: 287
Joined: Apr 17, 2008

 

Post#7 » by shawngoat23 » Fri May 16, 2008 1:52 am

Fo', fo', fo'. And another fo'.

Book it.

Scottie would be the second best SF by a huge margin in today's league (at worst). Hands down the best perimeter defensive player, plus he'll chip in an efficient 22/9/6 with 3 steals.

Prime McGinnis would be a shade worse than prime Kevin Garnett.

Prime Parish would be an efficient 19/11 shotblocker. I'd have him a shade under Yao and Dwight.

And I think everyone's very familiar with prime McGrady (2003) or prime Cassell (early 2000s).

I don't know anything about Maurice Stokes, so I won't comment there.
penbeast0
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
Posts: 30,358
And1: 9,911
Joined: Aug 14, 2004
Location: South Florida
 

 

Post#8 » by penbeast0 » Fri May 16, 2008 1:59 am

McGinnis was a lot more Amare Stoudamire than Garnett; from what I have heard, Stokes was a 6'5 muscular rebounder . . . think Wes Unseld only with even less of a shot.
“Most people use statistics like a drunk man uses a lamppost; more for support than illumination,” Andrew Lang.
cjx
Head Coach
Posts: 6,170
And1: 6,398
Joined: Aug 03, 2005

 

Post#9 » by cjx » Fri May 16, 2008 2:34 am

penbeast0 wrote:McGinnis was a lot more Amare Stoudamire than Garnett; from what I have heard, Stokes was a 6'5 muscular rebounder . . . think Wes Unseld only with even less of a shot.


Indeed, Stokes' field goal % was 34 to 35, but he grabbed about 16 boards a game and even contributed 5 apg.
Equanimity, peace, harmony and conscientiousness, friends
User avatar
Reks
Veteran
Posts: 2,507
And1: 0
Joined: Mar 30, 2007

 

Post#10 » by Reks » Fri May 16, 2008 5:22 am

I'm very persuaded to tell a McGrady joke...but in his prime he was insane. Anything less of a championship is a disappointment
menflavor
easily the worst realgm screen name

Return to Player Comparisons