Team H
F Scottie Pippen (prime)
F George McGinnis (prime)
C Robert Parish (prime)
G Sam Cassell (prime)
G Tracy McGrady (prime)
6 Maurice Stokes (prime)
Head coach: Doug Moe
How would this team fare against teams, such as the Celtics, Spurs, and Lakers?
What could this historical team do in today's playoffs?
Moderators: Clyde Frazier, Doctor MJ, trex_8063, penbeast0, PaulieWal
What could this historical team do in today's playoffs?
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,170
- And1: 6,398
- Joined: Aug 03, 2005
What could this historical team do in today's playoffs?
Equanimity, peace, harmony and conscientiousness, friends
-
- Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
- Posts: 30,358
- And1: 9,911
- Joined: Aug 14, 2004
- Location: South Florida
-
Doug Moe and that kind of talent, that'd be some kind of fun! A bit turnover prone and a prime candidate for an upset but the most talented team in the league and the most likely candidate to win it all.
Think this year's Boston Celtics . . . .
Think this year's Boston Celtics . . . .
“Most people use statistics like a drunk man uses a lamppost; more for support than illumination,” Andrew Lang.
- Basileus777
- General Manager
- Posts: 7,822
- And1: 2,051
- Joined: Jul 13, 2007
- Location: New Jersey
-
- CellarDoor
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 11,146
- And1: 972
- Joined: May 11, 2008
-
- shawngoat23
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,622
- And1: 287
- Joined: Apr 17, 2008
Fo', fo', fo'. And another fo'.
Book it.
Scottie would be the second best SF by a huge margin in today's league (at worst). Hands down the best perimeter defensive player, plus he'll chip in an efficient 22/9/6 with 3 steals.
Prime McGinnis would be a shade worse than prime Kevin Garnett.
Prime Parish would be an efficient 19/11 shotblocker. I'd have him a shade under Yao and Dwight.
And I think everyone's very familiar with prime McGrady (2003) or prime Cassell (early 2000s).
I don't know anything about Maurice Stokes, so I won't comment there.
Book it.
Scottie would be the second best SF by a huge margin in today's league (at worst). Hands down the best perimeter defensive player, plus he'll chip in an efficient 22/9/6 with 3 steals.
Prime McGinnis would be a shade worse than prime Kevin Garnett.
Prime Parish would be an efficient 19/11 shotblocker. I'd have him a shade under Yao and Dwight.
And I think everyone's very familiar with prime McGrady (2003) or prime Cassell (early 2000s).
I don't know anything about Maurice Stokes, so I won't comment there.
-
- Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
- Posts: 30,358
- And1: 9,911
- Joined: Aug 14, 2004
- Location: South Florida
-
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,170
- And1: 6,398
- Joined: Aug 03, 2005
penbeast0 wrote:McGinnis was a lot more Amare Stoudamire than Garnett; from what I have heard, Stokes was a 6'5 muscular rebounder . . . think Wes Unseld only with even less of a shot.
Indeed, Stokes' field goal % was 34 to 35, but he grabbed about 16 boards a game and even contributed 5 apg.
Equanimity, peace, harmony and conscientiousness, friends