mg wrote:Turner is a below average shooter, below average athlete who is putting up career numbers on a bad team in a contract year. Yes I think he can be a glue guy or a solid rotation player on a good team but he's not going to be worth the money some team will probably throw at him next summer. If you are expecting him to be a stud wing to take the Hawks to the next level think again.. Would not give up a 2014 pick for him unless it was heavily protected.
I hear what you're saying. 3 things, though:
1)The Spurs model we're attempting to copy doesn't look at how good a player someone is, but instead how their skillset fits into our system and team needs. Turner's ballhandling/playmaking would be a welcome addition to our team. Short and long term.
2)E Turner would be a drastic improvement over the SFs we've had on this team in the past 18 months.
3)ET's career progression & game remind me of Boris Diaw's a bit. He was not utilized and wasted away on Charlotte's bench. Now he's a key component for a contender. Because that coaching staff knows how to properly utilize his talents.
But I understand your disbelief. I suspect Turner's turnaround is as much about being in a disciplined offensive system this year as it is about producing in a contract year. He's a high-IQ guy who just needed a chance, and he's thriving this season. We don't need him to be a gamechanger.