ImageImageImage

Bill Walton

Moderators: bisme37, Froob, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts, Parliament10, canman1971, shackles10, snowman

Was Bill Walton a good addition to the C's

Yes
28
88%
No
1
3%
I have no opinion but feel the need to vote.
3
9%
 
Total votes: 32

User avatar
theman
RealGM
Posts: 13,541
And1: 1,432
Joined: May 23, 2001

Bill Walton 

Post#1 » by theman » Wed Feb 27, 2008 10:45 pm

Was Bill Walton a good pick up for the C's in 1985?
'At the beginning of a dynasty, taxation yields large revenues from small assessments. At the end of a dynasty, taxation yields small revenues from large assessments'. - Ibn Khaldun
GreenGrizz
Analyst
Posts: 3,466
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 23, 2005
Location: Vermont

 

Post#2 » by GreenGrizz » Wed Feb 27, 2008 11:01 pm

Oh indeed, he was a good pickup especially against Houston in the Finals. They had Olajuwon and Sampson. They were the very same team that beat Magic and the Lakers.
sully00
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 28,105
And1: 7,738
Joined: Jan 08, 2004
Location: Providence, RI
       

 

Post#3 » by sully00 » Wed Feb 27, 2008 11:16 pm

I say no, obviously not for '86 that was great, but for '87 that was not. It wasn't a bad pick up but I don't think that Walton added more to this team than Maxwell, we probably would have won without either of them, and certainly didn't add a damn thing in '87, when we really needed somebody.
User avatar
Scalamental
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,616
And1: 146
Joined: Dec 02, 2007

 

Post#4 » by Scalamental » Wed Feb 27, 2008 11:22 pm

I got to tell you, I bring nothing to the table here cuz i was born in 85. but, theman, i've been admiring your avatar since i noticed it a week ago, nice.
Fencer reregistered
RealGM
Posts: 41,038
And1: 27,915
Joined: Oct 25, 2006

 

Post#5 » by Fencer reregistered » Wed Feb 27, 2008 11:40 pm

If I recall correctly, Maxwell was pretty much done, at least down to the JAG level, despite being quite young.

So yes -- even though he only contributed significantly for one season, Walton was a good pickup.
Banned temporarily for, among other sins, being "Extremely Deviant".
Fencer reregistered
RealGM
Posts: 41,038
And1: 27,915
Joined: Oct 25, 2006

 

Post#6 » by Fencer reregistered » Wed Feb 27, 2008 11:41 pm

The really weird game was the one where Greg Kite played well, and Walton was put in late in a half to save him a foul.

Kite was in a daze about that in his post-game interview.

The sad part is that Kite's great game only amounted to something like 9 rebounds and not a lot of points.
Banned temporarily for, among other sins, being "Extremely Deviant".
BigHands
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,544
And1: 126
Joined: Aug 16, 2003
Location: On the bow contemplating the grandeur of the iceberg

 

Post#7 » by BigHands » Thu Feb 28, 2008 12:29 am

Fencer reregistered wrote:If I recall correctly, Maxwell was pretty much done, at least down to the JAG level, despite being quite young.

So yes -- even though he only contributed significantly for one season, Walton was a good pickup.


Max was pretty much done as he had no interest in the gym work necessary to recover from knee surgery.

He also had angered Red (and probably Bird too) so his days in Green were over.

So on his reputation he was worth a good bit but people watching closely knew he was next to useless in the 1985 playoffs.

Walton was a big gamble and I was surprised at the season he had in 85-86 and I was not surprised when he got hurt the next year.

Any move that gets a title is worth it and I doubt Max would have brought much else.....he was flakey and folks knew it.
"Sometimes I wonder whether the world is being run by smart people who are putting us on, or by imbeciles who really mean it." - Mark Twain
daveisceltics
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,457
And1: 517
Joined: Jun 30, 2006
Location: South Boston
       

 

Post#8 » by daveisceltics » Thu Feb 28, 2008 3:03 am

Bill was great in a Celtic uniform when he was healthy.
He even won the 6th man as most of you already know.
JJHondo17
Pro Prospect
Posts: 972
And1: 783
Joined: Jul 20, 2007
Location: Game#5 - June 4, 1976

 

Post#9 » by JJHondo17 » Thu Feb 28, 2008 2:11 pm

It was worth it just to watch Bird and Walton weave their magic for one season. They would have never been considered the greatest team of all time without him. Passing was elevated to an art form on that team.
thefoulness
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,763
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 28, 2005

 

Post#10 » by thefoulness » Thu Feb 28, 2008 6:59 pm

Anyone who says no is a moron or simply wasn't alive when Walton played for the best team that ever played.
User avatar
theman
RealGM
Posts: 13,541
And1: 1,432
Joined: May 23, 2001

 

Post#11 » by theman » Thu Feb 28, 2008 8:00 pm

Scalamental wrote:I got to tell you, I bring nothing to the table here cuz i was born in 85. but, theman, i've been admiring your avatar since i noticed it a week ago, nice.


Thanks. Wigglestruth made it for me.
'At the beginning of a dynasty, taxation yields large revenues from small assessments. At the end of a dynasty, taxation yields small revenues from large assessments'. - Ibn Khaldun
bill murray has game
Sophomore
Posts: 231
And1: 0
Joined: Oct 27, 2006

 

Post#12 » by bill murray has game » Mon Mar 3, 2008 1:09 am

Yes it was a good pick up but it was lame when he was talking about coming back with the Knicks later on although I forget the details.
YUKES
Sophomore
Posts: 214
And1: 0
Joined: May 12, 2004

 

Post#13 » by YUKES » Mon Mar 3, 2008 1:52 pm

why would it not have been a good trade?? did maxwell really do anything worthwhile afterwards to have made it bad? it's not like a young guy was traded that was great for another team for years.

plus, it added bill walton to the celtic legacy, and the man is quite possibly the best personality involved in basketall right now. it makes me like him just a little bit more when i listen to him at a halftime or during a game knowing that he not only played for the celts, but thoroughly enjoyed every minute of it and is immensely proud that he was able to.
sully00
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 28,105
And1: 7,738
Joined: Jan 08, 2004
Location: Providence, RI
       

 

Post#14 » by sully00 » Mon Mar 3, 2008 2:42 pm

Losing in '87 burns me just as much as winning in '86 brings back fond memories.

Like I said the '86 Celtics would have beaten the Rockets without either of Walton or Maxwell, it was a great team.

But the C's won 63 and 59 games the year before and after that '86 season without Walton. A healthy Walton basically was worth 4 more wins in the regular season and one playoff win against an inferior Rockets team than an injured Max. Sure Max was near the end of the line but Walton was passed it. Max at least had 3 more seasons, and while it isn't a lot when you haven't really been relevent for 20 years going to down to the Lakers in 6 because you counted on Walton and Wedman, two historic china dolls, to be your bench stays with you.

You all can think "Oh '86 how great," but to me that was the end of an era. I just fail to see the glory in that starting 5 only winning two titles and never going back to the finals again after '87. Simply because the Pistons retooled their bench and we wasted away.

It isn't that I dislike Walton, to the contrary and I am glad he has so much pride about being a Celtic, I just think we win in '86 and '87 with Max who played as well as Walton in '86 and a lot better in '87.

Return to Boston Celtics