Bill Walton
Moderators: bisme37, Froob, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts, Parliament10, canman1971, shackles10, snowman
Bill Walton
- theman
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,541
- And1: 1,432
- Joined: May 23, 2001
Bill Walton
Was Bill Walton a good pick up for the C's in 1985?
'At the beginning of a dynasty, taxation yields large revenues from small assessments. At the end of a dynasty, taxation yields small revenues from large assessments'. - Ibn Khaldun
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 41,038
- And1: 27,915
- Joined: Oct 25, 2006
The really weird game was the one where Greg Kite played well, and Walton was put in late in a half to save him a foul.
Kite was in a daze about that in his post-game interview.
The sad part is that Kite's great game only amounted to something like 9 rebounds and not a lot of points.
Kite was in a daze about that in his post-game interview.
The sad part is that Kite's great game only amounted to something like 9 rebounds and not a lot of points.
Banned temporarily for, among other sins, being "Extremely Deviant".
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,544
- And1: 126
- Joined: Aug 16, 2003
- Location: On the bow contemplating the grandeur of the iceberg
Fencer reregistered wrote:If I recall correctly, Maxwell was pretty much done, at least down to the JAG level, despite being quite young.
So yes -- even though he only contributed significantly for one season, Walton was a good pickup.
Max was pretty much done as he had no interest in the gym work necessary to recover from knee surgery.
He also had angered Red (and probably Bird too) so his days in Green were over.
So on his reputation he was worth a good bit but people watching closely knew he was next to useless in the 1985 playoffs.
Walton was a big gamble and I was surprised at the season he had in 85-86 and I was not surprised when he got hurt the next year.
Any move that gets a title is worth it and I doubt Max would have brought much else.....he was flakey and folks knew it.
"Sometimes I wonder whether the world is being run by smart people who are putting us on, or by imbeciles who really mean it." - Mark Twain
- theman
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,541
- And1: 1,432
- Joined: May 23, 2001
Scalamental wrote:I got to tell you, I bring nothing to the table here cuz i was born in 85. but, theman, i've been admiring your avatar since i noticed it a week ago, nice.
Thanks. Wigglestruth made it for me.
'At the beginning of a dynasty, taxation yields large revenues from small assessments. At the end of a dynasty, taxation yields small revenues from large assessments'. - Ibn Khaldun
-
- Sophomore
- Posts: 214
- And1: 0
- Joined: May 12, 2004
why would it not have been a good trade?? did maxwell really do anything worthwhile afterwards to have made it bad? it's not like a young guy was traded that was great for another team for years.
plus, it added bill walton to the celtic legacy, and the man is quite possibly the best personality involved in basketall right now. it makes me like him just a little bit more when i listen to him at a halftime or during a game knowing that he not only played for the celts, but thoroughly enjoyed every minute of it and is immensely proud that he was able to.
plus, it added bill walton to the celtic legacy, and the man is quite possibly the best personality involved in basketall right now. it makes me like him just a little bit more when i listen to him at a halftime or during a game knowing that he not only played for the celts, but thoroughly enjoyed every minute of it and is immensely proud that he was able to.
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 28,105
- And1: 7,738
- Joined: Jan 08, 2004
- Location: Providence, RI
-
Losing in '87 burns me just as much as winning in '86 brings back fond memories.
Like I said the '86 Celtics would have beaten the Rockets without either of Walton or Maxwell, it was a great team.
But the C's won 63 and 59 games the year before and after that '86 season without Walton. A healthy Walton basically was worth 4 more wins in the regular season and one playoff win against an inferior Rockets team than an injured Max. Sure Max was near the end of the line but Walton was passed it. Max at least had 3 more seasons, and while it isn't a lot when you haven't really been relevent for 20 years going to down to the Lakers in 6 because you counted on Walton and Wedman, two historic china dolls, to be your bench stays with you.
You all can think "Oh '86 how great," but to me that was the end of an era. I just fail to see the glory in that starting 5 only winning two titles and never going back to the finals again after '87. Simply because the Pistons retooled their bench and we wasted away.
It isn't that I dislike Walton, to the contrary and I am glad he has so much pride about being a Celtic, I just think we win in '86 and '87 with Max who played as well as Walton in '86 and a lot better in '87.
Like I said the '86 Celtics would have beaten the Rockets without either of Walton or Maxwell, it was a great team.
But the C's won 63 and 59 games the year before and after that '86 season without Walton. A healthy Walton basically was worth 4 more wins in the regular season and one playoff win against an inferior Rockets team than an injured Max. Sure Max was near the end of the line but Walton was passed it. Max at least had 3 more seasons, and while it isn't a lot when you haven't really been relevent for 20 years going to down to the Lakers in 6 because you counted on Walton and Wedman, two historic china dolls, to be your bench stays with you.
You all can think "Oh '86 how great," but to me that was the end of an era. I just fail to see the glory in that starting 5 only winning two titles and never going back to the finals again after '87. Simply because the Pistons retooled their bench and we wasted away.
It isn't that I dislike Walton, to the contrary and I am glad he has so much pride about being a Celtic, I just think we win in '86 and '87 with Max who played as well as Walton in '86 and a lot better in '87.