ImageImageImage

What if USA basketball sent the Cs to represent in China?

Moderators: bisme37, Froob, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts, Parliament10, canman1971, shackles10, snowman

Would the Cs be able to win gold in Beijing?

Yes, they'd walk away with Gold
32
89%
They'd come away with a Silver medal
3
8%
A disappointing bronze for USA
0
No votes
A disappointing bronze for USA
0
No votes
They wouldn't even get into the medal round.
1
3%
 
Total votes: 36

User avatar
wigglestrue
RealGM
Posts: 24,124
And1: 170
Joined: Feb 06, 2003
Location: Wiggling, after hitting a four-pointer of Truth

 

Post#21 » by wigglestrue » Wed Mar 19, 2008 6:27 am

In a vacuum, this Celtics team would probably perform as well as the '92 Dream Team, they would certainly blow out every opponent. But it's too hard to motivate young American NBA players for the Olympics.
0:01.8 A. Walker makes 3-pt shot from 28 ft (assist by E. Williams) +3 109-108
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D_9qvmXiEuU
User avatar
Cyclical
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,766
And1: 3,397
Joined: Nov 13, 2005
     

 

Post#22 » by Cyclical » Wed Mar 19, 2008 7:45 am

Whoever thinks they wouldn't take the gold is seriously delusional. Club teams are, for the most part, better than national teams. They play and practice together a lot more often. There are at least a dozen teams (probably more) in the NBA that would beat any national team out there.
User avatar
theman
RealGM
Posts: 13,541
And1: 1,432
Joined: May 23, 2001

 

Post#23 » by theman » Wed Mar 19, 2008 12:51 pm

bonsaiflipflops wrote:Yeah, as said... What about the Spain national basketball team?



Euro Basketball 2007 roster

4 Pau Gasol F
5 Rudy Fernandez G
6 Carlos Cabezas G
7 Juan Carlos Navarro G
8 Jos
'At the beginning of a dynasty, taxation yields large revenues from small assessments. At the end of a dynasty, taxation yields small revenues from large assessments'. - Ibn Khaldun
BadWolf
General Manager
Posts: 8,930
And1: 3,428
Joined: Jun 06, 2006

 

Post#24 » by BadWolf » Wed Mar 19, 2008 12:59 pm

The attitude like this usually gets team USA beaten. Sure, teams are usually better then national squads, same is true for european teams. It's much more obvious in soccer, then basket, as there's no NBA and all top players play in europe's best teams, but still.

Celtics have a few things in their favour, offcourse. Defense, solid allaround shooting, solid 3 point shooting, chemistry.
User avatar
campybatman
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,100
And1: 185
Joined: Apr 19, 2007

 

Post#25 » by campybatman » Wed Mar 19, 2008 8:54 pm

Spain 2007 versus Boston Celtics 2007-2008 in a seven-game series would be worthy of PPV. The marque match ups are there. What you've is two rosters that feature good comradery, chemistry and passion. There are capable shooters on both sides but team defense would be the difference here.
jfs1000d
RealGM
Posts: 28,044
And1: 14,868
Joined: Jun 25, 2004

 

Post#26 » by jfs1000d » Wed Mar 19, 2008 9:22 pm

theman wrote:I have long been a proponent of sending the NCAA champion team. One of the reasons the U.S.A has not been winning lately is because other national teams play together a long time where the U.S. throws a team together at the last minute.

BTW - I don't see " Calderon, Navarro, Fernandez, Garbajosa, Gasol." being any better than Foye, McCants, Snyder, Gomes, Jefferson.


The NCAA champion finishes with Angola. They get killed by 30 plus points. Are you that arrogant?

KG, Pierce and Ray are among the top 30 players in the world. That's why we are a threat. But, we could lose to spain, Argentina, France just as easily.


Last year's Florida team wouldn't come in 40 points of Argentina.
User avatar
Cyclical
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,766
And1: 3,397
Joined: Nov 13, 2005
     

 

Post#27 » by Cyclical » Thu Mar 20, 2008 12:10 am

bonsaiflipflops wrote:Spain 2007 versus Boston Celtics 2007-2008 in a seven-game series would be worthy of PPV. The marque match ups are there. What you've is two rosters that feature good comradery, chemistry and passion. There are capable shooters on both sides but team defense would be the difference here.


Honestly I personally don't see it as being that close. I'd say Celts take it 4-1. One game to get adjusted to International rules... The Celtics are much deeper and they play much better defense. Their starting 5 are better; the bench is better. Spain would be no match.
User avatar
wigglestrue
RealGM
Posts: 24,124
And1: 170
Joined: Feb 06, 2003
Location: Wiggling, after hitting a four-pointer of Truth

 

Post#28 » by wigglestrue » Thu Mar 20, 2008 1:17 pm

Cyclical wrote:Honestly I personally don't see it as being that close. I'd say Celts take it 4-1. One game to get adjusted to International rules... The Celtics are much deeper and they play much better defense. Their starting 5 are better; the bench is better. Spain would be no match.


Not only would the Celtics sweep Spain...
They would win every game by 30+ points.
0:01.8 A. Walker makes 3-pt shot from 28 ft (assist by E. Williams) +3 109-108
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D_9qvmXiEuU
Tenbomber
Banned User
Posts: 6,073
And1: 989
Joined: Apr 26, 2005

 

Post#29 » by Tenbomber » Thu Mar 20, 2008 1:34 pm

IMO ....It would be like the "Globetrotters" facing a whole host of "Washington General's" teams....

It would be a joke to send any good professional NBA team to face Olympic competition.....

Heck even the Knicks would make the final round...
Rocky5000
Analyst
Posts: 3,386
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 15, 2008

 

Post#30 » by Rocky5000 » Thu Mar 20, 2008 7:10 pm

Ray Allen would probably average 40 a game with the shorter 3 point line. Rondo would just abuse the competition for layup after layup.

Return to Boston Celtics