ImageImageImage

OT - Fire Danny

Moderators: bisme37, Froob, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts, Parliament10, canman1971, shackles10, snowman

Celtics_Champs
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 53,597
And1: 8,077
Joined: Jan 13, 2005
Location: TD Garden
 

Re: OT - Fire Danny 

Post#61 » by Celtics_Champs » Mon Jan 12, 2009 7:44 pm

Wait a minute.

This is not off topic!
User avatar
greenbeans
RealGM
Posts: 60,146
And1: 14,187
Joined: Sep 14, 2007
     

Re: OT - Fire Danny 

Post#62 » by greenbeans » Tue Jan 13, 2009 10:55 pm

PPAW4Life
Banned User
Posts: 1,546
And1: 1
Joined: Nov 23, 2007

Re: OT - Fire Danny 

Post#63 » by PPAW4Life » Wed Jan 14, 2009 7:43 pm

Just take a look at this past offseason.

When no players were willing to sacrifice money to chase a ring, Danny had to settle for POB, TA, and Eddie House.

Everyone thought Danny did a great job 2 offseasons ago by getting Posey, House, but it wasn't some mastermind maneuvering that Danny did to get these guys....the presence of the Big 3 was the biggest factor.

Danny Ainge's best move as GM was trading for Toine and getting GP back and trading Jiri Welsch for a 1st rounder.
User avatar
greenbeans
RealGM
Posts: 60,146
And1: 14,187
Joined: Sep 14, 2007
     

Re: OT - Fire Danny 

Post#64 » by greenbeans » Wed Jan 14, 2009 8:01 pm

PPAW4Life wrote:Danny Ainge's best move as GM was trading for Toine and getting GP back and trading Jiri Welsch for a 1st rounder.

Puff puff and pass that stuff my way man.
User avatar
Cyclical
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,766
And1: 3,397
Joined: Nov 13, 2005
     

Re: OT - Fire Danny 

Post#65 » by Cyclical » Wed Jan 14, 2009 8:11 pm

Celtics_Champs wrote:Wait a minute.

This is not off topic!


He meant to write OB (Off Base).
User avatar
DorfonCeltics
Analyst
Posts: 3,680
And1: 215
Joined: Feb 24, 2005

Re: OT - Fire Danny 

Post#66 » by DorfonCeltics » Wed Jan 14, 2009 8:22 pm

Cyclical wrote:
Celtics_Champs wrote:Wait a minute.

This is not off topic!


He meant to write OB (Off Base).


Or CU (Chemically unbalanced)
Athanacropolis
Analyst
Posts: 3,321
And1: 3
Joined: Feb 28, 2005

Re: OT - Fire Danny 

Post#67 » by Athanacropolis » Thu Jan 15, 2009 3:45 am

I love this post...it's like we're back in 2005!
User avatar
chakdaddy
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,378
And1: 1,420
Joined: Nov 24, 2006

Re: OT - Fire Danny 

Post#68 » by chakdaddy » Thu Jan 15, 2009 4:52 am

Banks2Pierce wrote:For all the guys criticizing the Roy/Ratliff trade, can you guys propose a way in which we would've gotten KG without this trade?


Putting aside the idea that Roy + LaFrentz could have been thrown in the trade and we pretty much break even (Minnesota winds up getting a better deal, maybe we keep Gomes or a draft pick)

Putting aside that getting Ratliff's contract in the deal serendipitously wound up being useful a year later...

Putting those things aside, how do we justify giving up a #7 pick in exchange for a former #13 pick who was a bust so far, and to shave one year off of LaFrentz's contract? More importantly, HOW DID WE NOT GET ANOTHER DRAFT PICK OUT OF THE DEAL? When Portland is flush with #1's they purchase every year and had an excess of overseas prospects?? For instance, why couldn't Portland have purchased the Rondo pick and sent it to us as part of this deal?

Honestly, you could even argue that we should've squeezed the next year's #1 out of Portland in that deal and gotten Oden/Durant! Maybe that's going a little far, but still.

But seriously, Ainge grossly overpaid when he wanted to dump that pick; instead of picking up some extra picks to make it out, he basicaly told Portland "keep the change." And meanwhile, he overpaid for low pick to get Rondo. In both cases, the results turned out great, but we should have paid cash for Rondo instead of trading a useful pick, and we should have netted extra picks in the Telfair deal - both of which would come in really handy for our depth problems this year.

You could argue that anything extra we got would've gotten tossed in the KG deal and it would be a wash, which may be true; but that doesn't mean that Danny didn't horribly fail to maximize his return on the Telfair deal and minimize his expense on the Rondo deal.
PPAW4Life
Banned User
Posts: 1,546
And1: 1
Joined: Nov 23, 2007

Re: OT - Fire Danny 

Post#69 » by PPAW4Life » Thu Jan 15, 2009 4:35 pm

Danny Ainge is a genius.....

....because 2 people said "OK".....

McHale: "Mr. Taylor, it's time to rebuild and go young, time to trade Big Ticket."

Glenn Taylor: "OK, I trust you Kevin, just like with Joe Smith...I trust you with Ticket"

McHale: "Ticket, we're thinking of rebuilding and so we are thinking about trading you to Boston, they just got Ray Allen, what do you say Ticket?"

Big Ticket: "OK"
User avatar
ParticleMan
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 15,070
And1: 9,071
Joined: Sep 16, 2004
     

Re: OT - Fire Danny 

Post#70 » by ParticleMan » Thu Jan 15, 2009 9:58 pm

PPAW4Life wrote:Danny Ainge is a genius.....

....because 2 people said "OK".....

McHale: "Mr. Taylor, it's time to rebuild and go young, time to trade Big Ticket."

Glenn Taylor: "OK, I trust you Kevin, just like with Joe Smith...I trust you with Ticket"

McHale: "Ticket, we're thinking of rebuilding and so we are thinking about trading you to Boston, they just got Ray Allen, what do you say Ticket?"

Big Ticket: "OK"


What you're not getting is that Danny had acquired the CHIPS to make this happen.

KG didn't even want to come here at first. Danny had the chips to get Ray, and STILL had enough chips left over to make a good offer for KG. KG may have wanted to go to Boston after we got Ray, but unless we had Al + quality players + expiring contract + picks to exchange, KG would have ended up a Laker or whatever.

Getting all those chips wasn't just dumb luck. It takes a lot of planning to do that. If it was that easy to do, a lot more teams would go from 24 wins to 66 wins in 1 offseason.
PPAW4Life
Banned User
Posts: 1,546
And1: 1
Joined: Nov 23, 2007

Re: OT - Fire Danny 

Post#71 » by PPAW4Life » Thu Jan 15, 2009 10:35 pm

Except Danny Ainge's plan wasn't to get KG it was to tank for Oden or Durrant.

Missing out on the 1st or 2nd pick and Pierce threatening for a trade forced Danny's hand to act.
User avatar
greenbeans
RealGM
Posts: 60,146
And1: 14,187
Joined: Sep 14, 2007
     

Re: OT - Fire Danny 

Post#72 » by greenbeans » Thu Jan 15, 2009 10:43 pm

He built up for last offseason, whether you think it was for the draft or fa period isn't relevant. Seriously, what happened to you that the guy who finally brought the C's their title has you this upset?

Return to Boston Celtics


cron