Wes-J wrote:IMO Ingram is closer to Durant than Simmons is to LeBron, considering those are the comparables I'm seeing.
Simmons is a rich man's Lamar Odom.
Moderators: bisme37, Froob, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts, Parliament10, canman1971, shackles10, snowman
Wes-J wrote:IMO Ingram is closer to Durant than Simmons is to LeBron, considering those are the comparables I'm seeing.
SirTankalot wrote:Wes-J wrote:IMO Ingram is closer to Durant than Simmons is to LeBron, considering those are the comparables I'm seeing.
Simmons is a rich man's Lamar Odom.
                                     
                                                                      SirTankalot wrote:Wes-J wrote:IMO Ingram is closer to Durant than Simmons is to LeBron, considering those are the comparables I'm seeing.
Simmons is a rich man's Lamar Odom.
Gomes3PC wrote:Simmons is a true PF, whereas what makes Lebron great is he is quick enough to blow by NBA SFs. Simmons doesn't have that gear in him, but he's a heck of a talent.
Trimble to me is basically a poor man's D'Angelo Russell, which in the 20's is a fine pick. Not sure what role he has on this roster barring Danny trading off multiple guards, but a lot of time between now and the draft.
For those picks in the 18-25 range, I like Deyonta Davis (super bouncy PF/C - Zeller replacement), Valentine (SG/SF - see some Turner in him), Sabonis (super smooth, love the lefties - think he will develop a 3 in the NBA), and Thomas Bryant (potential Sully replacement).
Sabonis especially intrigues me. Great bloodlines, just a really smooth athlete. His jumper hasn't been extended yet, but a year in the D-League and I think he can start to flash it like Mickey. Not to continue the comparison to current Cs players, but he has a similar body/frame/game to Jerebko, albeit a better interior scorer and I am more projecting the 3 point shooting than anything.
Gomes3PC wrote:I tend to agree, but if he winds up in the 10-14 range, we may be able to do something like Mavs/Cs 1st + Philly 2nd to move up and get him. Some team like Sacto, Washington or Houston could definitely look at those three picks and decide it makes better sense to bet on three picks in a deep draft than one up in the late lotto.
Gomes3PC wrote:Odom in his prime was a borderline superstar. A 9-10 win player. Certainly good enough to be the 3rd-best guy on a title team. So if Simmons is better than that, you're effectively saying he can be one of your two centerpieces to a title contender.
                                                                                           
               Pacino62 wrote:SirTankalot wrote:Wes-J wrote:IMO Ingram is closer to Durant than Simmons is to LeBron, considering those are the comparables I'm seeing.
Simmons is a rich man's Lamar Odom.
Not sure if I agree entirely, but...a rich man's prime Odom without the external issues...
                                                                                           
               DoubleHappiness wrote:All these weird Simmons comps.
Oden was a legit center, a very large and gifted human being who could reach very high. And as much as I love me some NBA draft net, LBJ is a bad comparison.
                                                                                                          

SmartWentCrazy wrote:Ben Simmons is incredibly unique, he really doesn't really have a good comp. He's an elite rebounder, a great passer with elite vision and is elite at drawing contact and getting to the line. He can't really shoot, which hinders his ability to score, yet he's surprisingly good at shooting free throws.
I'd be shocked if he couldn't come in to this team next year and average 14-11-4.
165bows wrote:Schmitz had a bunch of comps with video to compare Simmons, including Blake Griffin, Lamar Odom, Boris Diaw and one I hadn't though of, Michael Beasley. That last one is a bit frightening, especially since he was the closest comp physically of all of them to Simmons in terms of measurements. Beasley had even better rebounding numbers per minute in college than Simmons, but ended up being fairly typical as a combo forward rebounding the ball.
165bows wrote:SmartWentCrazy wrote:Ben Simmons is incredibly unique, he really doesn't really have a good comp. He's an elite rebounder, a great passer with elite vision and is elite at drawing contact and getting to the line. He can't really shoot, which hinders his ability to score, yet he's surprisingly good at shooting free throws.
I'd be shocked if he couldn't come in to this team next year and average 14-11-4.
Schmitz had a bunch of comps with video to compare Simmons, including Blake Griffin, Lamar Odom, Boris Diaw and one I hadn't though of, Michael Beasley. That last one is a bit frightening, especially since he was the closest comp physically of all of them to Simmons in terms of measurements. Beasley had even better rebounding numbers per minute in college than Simmons, but ended up being fairly typical as a combo forward rebounding the ball.
Gomes3PC wrote:Lastly, a lot of why Beasley failed in the NBA was simply because he did not put the work in. He had all the tools to become an elite modern stretch PF, but decided he wanted to become a small forward, where he failed spectacularly.