ConstableGeneva wrote:
that is insane!!!
Moderators: bisme37, Parliament10, canman1971, shackles10, snowman, Froob, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts
ConstableGeneva wrote:
Mr_Mojo_Risin wrote:I really rate Mikal, Knicks are tough as-is if they sign OG and Hartenstein. Not saying we couldn't/wouldn't beat them in a 7 game series, but they are seriously tough.
flintsky21 wrote:Good for the Knicks, but I feel like if they keep OG and Randle too, this could be a case of diminishing returns by having way too many wings, similar to when we had Brogdon, White, and Smart.

SuperDeluxe wrote:Knicks going all in, sacrificing the future to become contenders now. That was a lot to give for Bridges tho. Thing is, if they end up losing Anunoby for nothing, what just happened would amount to trading Anunoby for Bridges, then flushing a truckload of picks down the toilet. Hartenstein is also not guaranteed to resign.
Having said that, they may not be done. They still have about $40M in tradeable salary (Randle and Robinson) so they may be onto something.


Fierce1 wrote:Mr_Mojo_Risin wrote:I really rate Mikal, Knicks are tough as-is if they sign OG and Hartenstein. Not saying we couldn't/wouldn't beat them in a 7 game series, but they are seriously tough.
We'll cross that Mikal Bridge when we get there.


